Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

AAR CORP.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
  (5) Total fee paid:
         

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
  (3) Filing Party:
         
  (4) Date Filed:
         

LOGOTable of Contents

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2011

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be Held on Wednesday, October 8, 2014

GRAPHIC

August 29, 2014


To Our Stockholders:

We cordially invite you to attend our 20112014 annual meeting of stockholders — our 45th annual meeting as a public company.stockholders. Information about the annual meeting is set forth below and in the accompanying proxy statement.

Date:Date

 

Wednesday, October 12, 20118, 2014


Time:Time



9:00 a.m., Chicago time


Place:Place



AAR CORP.
One AAR Place
1100 North Wood Dale Road
Wood Dale, Illinois 60191


Purposes:Purposes



The purposes of our 2011At the annual meeting, of stockholders areyou will be asked to:





 

Elect four Class III directors to serve until the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders;directors;






HoldVote on an advisory vote onresolution to approve our Fiscal 2014 executive compensation;





Hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future executive compensation votes;





Approve an amendment to the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan to add performance criteria in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;





Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company'sour independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2012;firm; and






Transact any other business that may properly come before the 2011 annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting.


Record Date:Date



You may vote your shares at the annual meeting if you were a stockholder of record on August 19, 2011. If you were not a stockholder of record and hold your shares in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the voting instructions you receive from the nominee on how to vote your shares.2014.


Voting:Voting




Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend our annual meeting, weWe encourage you to vote your shares as soon as possible over the Internet, by telephone, or by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

By Order of the Board of Directors,



Robert J. Regan
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

September 2, 2011


Robert J. Regan
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE
2011 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents


Page

20112014 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 iv

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

 1
 

Why am I receiving the proxy materials?

 1
 

What information is contained in the proxy materials?

1

How do I access the proxy materials electronically?

1

What proposals are stockholders voting on at the annual meeting?

1

Who is entitled to vote?

2

How do stockholders vote by proxy or in person?

2

How do stockholders vote by telephone or over the Internet?

2

How do stockholders revoke a proxy?

2

How will the proxy holders vote shares?

3

How will the votes be counted?

3

Who is the Company's proxy solicitor?

3

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF OUR DIRECTORS

 45
 

Information about theOur Director Nominees and Our Continuing Directors

 45

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ONRESOLUTION TO APPROVE OUR FISCAL 2014 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

9

PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION VOTES

 10

PROPOSAL 4 — APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AAR CORP. STOCK BENEFIT PLAN TO ADD SECTION 162(m) PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

 11
 

Proposed Amendment

11

Summary of the Plan

12

Awards Granted Under the Plan

15

Vote Required for Approval

16

Equity Compensation Plan Information

16

PROPOSAL 53 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS THE COMPANY'SOUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 1712
 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

 1712
 

Vote Required for Ratification

17

i


Table of Contents


Page

Audit Committee Report for Fiscal 20112014

 1813

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 2015
 

GeneralDirector Nominations and Qualifications

 2015
 

Director Independence

 2017
 

Board Leadership Structureand Lead Director

 2117
 

Risk Management Oversight

 2218
 

Executive Sessions

19

Communications with the Board of Directors

 2219
 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 2319
 

Director Nominations and Qualifications

23

Executive Sessions

24

Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

 2419
 

Related Person Transaction Policy

 2520
 

Board Committees

 2621
 

Board Meetings and Attendance

 2924
 

Director Compensation

 2924
 

Director Compensation Table

 3025
 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 3126

ii


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 3227
 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 3227
 

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation for Fiscal 20112014

 51
 

Summary Compensation Table

 52
 

Fiscal 20112014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 55
 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20112014 Year-End

 57
 

Fiscal 20112014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 59
 

Retirement Program Benefits

 60
 

Fiscal 20112014 Pension Benefits

 60
 

Fiscal 20112014 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

 63
 

Potential Payments Upon a Termination of Employment or a Change in Control of the Company

 66
 

Tables of Potential Payments Upon a Termination of Employment or a Change in Control

 71

ii


Table of Contents


Page

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF OUR MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

 7374
 

Security Ownership of Management

 7374
 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

 7475
 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 7576

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

77

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR OUR 2015 ANNUAL MEETING

78

OTHER BUSINESS

 7578

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

76

APPENDIX A — AAR CORP. CATEGORICAL STANDARDS AND POLICY FOR DETERMINING DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

A-1

 
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on October 12, 2011; Copies of this Notice and Proxy Statement and the Company's 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders (including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011) are available free of charge at www.proxyvote.com.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Our Proxy Materials
For Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on Wednesday, October 8, 2014:

 Copies of this Notice and Proxy Statement, our 2014 Annual Report to Stockholders and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014 are available free of charge at  www.proxyvote.com.

iii


Table of Contents

LOGO



2011 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
2014 Proxy Statement Summary


This summary highlights certain information addressed in more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement. You shouldPlease read carefully the entire proxy statement before voting your shares.


Annual Meeting Information

Annual Meeting:Time and Date

 Wednesday, October 12, 20118, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., Chicago time at

Place

AAR CORP.'s corporate headquarters located at
One AAR Place
1100 North Wood Dale Road
Wood Dale, Illinois 60191

Record Date:Date


 

Friday,Tuesday, August 19, 20112014

Voting:Voting


 

You have one vote for each shareStockholders of Common Stock that you owned onrecord as of the record date.date may vote by Internet at www.proxy.vote.com; by telephone at 1-800-690-6903; by completing and returning their proxy card or voting information card; or in person at the annual meeting.


Proposals To Be Voted On By Our Stockholders


Election of four Class III directors (Proposal 1 — pages 5-9):

Matters to be Voted On:Name


Age

Brief Biography

Board
Recommendation


Patrick J. Kelly

59Since 1986, Managing Director of KMK & Associates, LLC (a private equity firm with interests in companies operating in the food, distribution, technology, financial services, real estate and energy industries).   ProposalFOR

Peter Pace

68General, U.S. Marine Corps (Retired). From 2005 to 2007, (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Board RecommendationFOR 

Timothy J. Romenesko

  Proposal 1:57 Election of four Class III directors Since 2007, President and Chief Operating Officer of AAR CORP. From 1994 to 2007, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AAR CORP. From 1991 to 1994, Corporate Controller of AAR CORP.FOR ALL NOMINEES

Ronald B. Woodard


 

Proposal 2:

 

Advisory vote on executive compensation71

 

Since 2003, Chairman of MagnaDrive, Inc. (an industrial torque transfer equipment company, which he co founded following his retirement from The Boeing Company after 32 years). From 1995 to 1998, President of the Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.FOR



Proposal 3:


Advisory vote on the frequency of futureresolution to approve our Fiscal 2014 executive compensation votes(Proposal 2 — pages 10-11).
FOR
 

ANNUAL (1 YEAR)



Proposal 4:


Approval of an amendment to the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan to add Section 162(m) performance criteria


FOR



Proposal 5:


Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3 — page 12).

 

FOR


Proposal 1: We are asking our stockholders to voteFOR the following nominees for Class III directors:


 
 
Name
 Age Brief Biography Director
Since
 
  Ronald R. Fogleman  69 President and Chief Operating Officer of B Bar J Cattle & Consulting Company; previously, General, Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force (Retired)  2001 
  Patrick J. Kelly  56 Managing Director of KMK & Associates, LLC  2006 
  Peter Pace  65 General, U.S. Marine Corps(Retired), Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff  2011 
  Ronald B. Woodard  68 Chairman of MagnaDrive, Inc.; previously, President of the Boeing Commercial Airplane Group  2004 


Proposal 2:We are asking our stockholders to voteFOR an advisory resolution on the Company's executive compensation as reported in this proxy statement. Please read the "Executive Compensation" section below and our "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for information relating to our executive compensation program for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 ("Fiscal 2011").

iv


Table of Contents


Fiscal 2014 Business Performance Highlights

AAR CORP. (the "Company") is a leading provider of diversified products and services to the worldwide aviation and government and defense markets. We delivered solid financial results for our fiscal year ended May 31, 2014 ("Fiscal 2014"), despite reductions in demand from our government and defense customers owing principally to the drawdown of the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan.

Our continued focus on our core businesses — aviation services and technology products — together with ongoing efforts to manage costs and strengthen our balance sheet, contributed to the following performance highlights in Fiscal 2014:

We reported record diluted earnings per share of $1.83, compared to $1.38 per share in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013 ("Fiscal 2013");

We generated strong cash flow in Fiscal 2014, producing almost $140 million in cash flow from operations and $113 million in free cash flow, which allowed us to reduce our net debt by $89 million, pay dividends totaling $11.8 million to our stockholders and invest further in our businesses to ensure future growth;

We expanded our product/service portfolio and strengthened our strategic capabilities in Fiscal 2014 with the opening of a new airframe service center in Lake Charles, Louisiana, the acquisition of a niche commercial cargo loading systems business in Germany and the addition of a new supply chain hub in Brussels, Belgium;

Our stock price increased 21% in Fiscal 2014 to $24.30 per share from $20.06 per share, and 66% in Fiscal 2013 to $20.06 per share from $12.05 per share (our stock price on August 22, 2014 was $27.23 per share); and

We received several industry awards in recognition of our performance ("Best Airframe MRO Provider in the Americas," "Outstanding Component Repair Provider" and"Boeing Gold Performance Excellence Award"), and we were again named as one of Forbes magazine's "100 Most Trustworthy Companies" in 2014.

For more information about our financial and operating performance in Fiscal 2014, please see "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 17, 2014. For more information about our stock price performance, please see "Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return" in our Form 10-K.

v


Proposal 3:We are asking our stockholders to vote on how often the Company should hold an advisory vote on executive compensation in the future. We believe that an annual (1 year) advisory vote will permit stockholders to provide direct and timely feedback on our executive compensation policies and practices.


Proposal 4:




We are asking our stockholders to voteFOR an amendment to the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan to add performance criteria that will help assure the deductibility of stock awards under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


Proposal 5:




We are asking our stockholders to voteFOR ratification of the Audit Committee's appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2012 ("Fiscal 2012"). The fees paid to KPMG LLP for the last two fiscal years were:


Table of Contents

 
 
Description of Fees
 Fiscal 2011 Fiscal 2010 
  Audit Fees $1,275,000 $1,490,000 
  Audit Related Fees  63,386  243,090 
  Tax Fees  335,536  268,588 
  All Other Fees  0  40,000 


Executive Compensation Highlights

Stockholder Outreach Program

We conducted a formal stockholder outreach program in Fiscal 2014 following the say-on-pay vote at our 2013 annual meeting. The purpose of the program was to gain a better understanding of concerns related to our executive compensation program and other matters of stockholder interest. Under the program, which was supplemental to our regular ongoing communications with stockholders, we reached out to stockholders owning approximately 75% of our outstanding shares. Participants in the outreach effort included at various times our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. We also received feedback from two proxy advisory firms, Institutional Stockholder Services ("ISS") and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. ("Glass Lewis").

The following table identifies the concerns raised by our stock-holders, ISS and Glass Lewis, and the actions we took in Fiscal 2014:

Stockholder Concern

AAR Action

Tax gross-ups

Eliminated all tax gross-ups in the new employment agreement of the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Compensation:

TheOfficer David P. Storch (we previously committed in 2012 not to provide tax gross-ups in any future executive compensation awardedagreement)

"Single-trigger" vesting upon a change in control

Eliminated automatic "single-trigger" vesting and imposed "double-trigger" vesting (which requires a change in control and a termination of employment) in all award agreements under the Company's 2013 stock plan and in Mr. Storch's new employment agreement

Annual cash bonuses

Exercised negative discretion to reduce by 30% the performance-based cash bonuses paid to the five named executive officers inwhose bonuses under the Fiscal 2011 reflected and, in the Compensation Committee's view, contributed to the Company's exceptional business2014 short-term incentive plan were based on Company-wide performance for the year. Fiscal 2011 executive compensation also underlined the Company's commitment to pay for performance.

Variable performance-based compensation


 

The Company achieved record consolidated sales
Awarded performance-based compensation (consisting of $1.78 billion in Fiscal 2011 (a 34.9% increase over Fiscal 2010)cash bonuses, performance-based restricted stock and earned net income of $69.8 million (a 56.5% increase over Fiscal 2010) and diluted earnings per share of $1.73 (a 49.1% increase over Fiscal 2010). Our businesses generated $108.6 million in cash flow from operations during Fiscal 2011, most of which was reinvested to strengthen and broaden our product and service capabilities for the future. We also began paying an annual dividend of $.30 per share in the fourth quarterstock options) representing 66% of Fiscal 2011.



As a result2014 total direct compensation for Mr. Storch and at least 50% for each of these business performance results, annual cash incentives to the other named executive officers paid out just below

Return metric and burn rate under long-term incentive plan

Added return on invested capital, together with three-year cumulative net income, as the maximum leveltwo performance goals for performance-based restricted stock under our Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan; also granted significantly fewer shares under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan consistent with our burn rate commitment under the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan

CEO retirement contribution under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan

Reduced this contribution by 50% for Fiscal 2014 and amended the non-qualified deferred compensation plan to provide the Compensation Committee with the ability to exercise negative discretion with respect to contributions for all plan participants

Peer group composition

Made changes to our peer group in Fiscal 2011. However, total direct2014 (and again in Fiscal 2015) to assure that our peer group companies share similar revenue numbers and industry/business classifications (we gave less weight to market capitalization as a factor given that its fluctuations often result in dramatic year-to-year changes in peer groups)

Hedging and pledging of Company stock

Prohibited hedging and pledging of Company stock by our directors, officers and employees under our insider trading policy

Independence of Compensation Consultant

Determined affirmatively that Mercer (US) Inc. ("Mercer"), the compensation (defined as base salary plus annual cash incentive plus long-term incentive compensation), as well as "Total" compensation reportedconsultant to our Compensation Committee, meets the independence criteria established by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")

Stockholder rights plan

Reviewed by the Board in Fiscal 2014 with outside advisors; confirmed its appropriateness for the Summary Compensation TableCompany at this juncture and agreed to revisit the plan closer in time to its expiration date in 2017

Protections in CEO's employment agreement

See "New Employment Agreement with Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer" on page 52,decreased54 for foura summary of the named executive officers in Fiscal 2011 versus Fiscal 2010, principally as a result of significantly lower long-term incentive compensation in Fiscal 2011.


Additional Information:




The Company strives to maintain corporate governance "best practices." Foremost among these is the Company's commitment to a strongprotections voluntarily forfeited by Mr. Storch and independent Board of Directors. In Fiscal 2011, the Company added to the quality of its Board leadership with the election of General Peter Pace as a director. General Pace, a nominee for election at this year's annual meeting of stockholders, served with distinction in the United States Marine Corps for over 40 yearsother terms and was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 2005 to 2007.provisions

vi


v

Table of Contents

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

New Employment Agreement. We entered into a new three-year employment agreement with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer David P. Storch. The agreement provides for the elimination of all tax gross-ups and the ability of Mr. Storch to terminate employment for any reason during the 25th month after a change in control and still receive severance. The agreement imposes a "double trigger" on the vesting of stock awards upon a change in control. The agreement also provides that the Compensation Committee will determine all short-term and long-term incentive awards for Mr. Storch as a part of its regular annual compensation-setting process.

Fiscal 2014 Compensation. Mr. Storch received a 2% increase over his year-end base salary, a significantly reduced cash bonus (30% below the bonus determined by formula under the short-term incentive plan) and a 10% increase in the number of shares under his long-term incentive award, all as reflected in the table below (note that Fiscal 2013 actual base salary was the amount paid in Fiscal 2013, not the year-end base salary).

 
  
 
  
   
Fiscal 2013 ($)
  
  
Fiscal 2014 ($)
  

 Compensation Element 

 

 

 Actual 

 

 

 Target 

 

 

 Per Formula 

 

 

 Actual 

 

Base Salary

   

877,838

   

906,449

   

N/A

   

906,449

 

Annual Cash Incentive

   

1,350,685

   

1,133,061

   

1,216,498

   

851,548

 

Long Term Incentive Compensation

   

1,314,720

   

2,964,720

   

N/A

   

2,964,720

 
CEO Compensation Mix in Fiscal 2014. As shown below, Mr. Storch's acutal Fiscal 2014 compensation was significantly weighted toward variable performance-based compensation. His performance-based restricted stock award, stock options and performance-based cash bonus represented 66% of his total direct compensation in Fiscal 2014.GRAPHIC

vii


Table of Contents

Fiscal 2015 Executive Compensation Actions

Our Compensation Committee made significant changes to the Company's executive compensation program in Fiscal 2015 based on its consideration of the following factors: the macro-environment in which the Company operates its businesses; the Company's performance in Fiscal 2014 and its expected performance in Fiscal 2015; the executive compensation assessment prepared by its independent compensation consultant in July 2014; the Company's commitment to meeting the burn rate parameters under the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan; stockholder concerns identified in our stockholder outreach program; and other relevant items. In sum, the Compensation Committee took the following Fiscal 2015 executive compensation actions:

Froze base salaries at their Fiscal 2014 levels;

Retained earnings per share and cash flow from operations as the performance goals under the Fiscal 2015 short-term incentive plan;

Granted a total of 288,206 shares to employees under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan (which equals 576,412 "equivalent shares" for purposes of the burn rate calculation given that the shares granted were performance-based and time-based restricted stock), as contrasted with a total of 1,154,631 shares granted to employees under the Fiscal 2014 long-term incentive plan (which equals 1,276,247 "equivalent shares" for purposes of the burn rate calculation as the shares granted included performance-based and time-based restricted stock as well as stock options) — thus, a 75% reduction in total shares and a 55% reduction in "equivalent shares";

Consistent with the above, granted stock awards with a dollar value of $1,695,200 to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in Fiscal 2015, compared to Fiscal 2014 stock awards of $2,964,720 — a 43% reduction in the dollar value of the stock awards;

Altered the mix of stock awards under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan to place greater emphasis on performance-based restricted stock (75% of total stock awards in Fiscal 2015 are performance-based restricted stock compared to 23% in Fiscal 2014); and

Approved return on invested capital and cumulative net income as the two performance goals for performance-based restricted stock under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan.

Key Compensation Policies and Practices

The following policies and practices are key elements of the Company's executive compensation program:

Annual advisory stockholder approval of executive compensation;

Non-guaranteed performance-based bonuses;

Challenging performance targets under both the short-term and long-term incentive plans;

Significant vesting periods for stock awards and stock options;

No repricing of stock options without stockholder approval;

No dividends on unearned performance based restricted stock until performance goals are met;

Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers;

Policy prohibiting short sales, pledging and hedging transactions;

No tax-gross ups in CEO's employment agreement or any new agreement since 2012; and

Clawback of incentive compensation in the event of certain financial restatements.

viii


Table of Contents


Corporate Governance Highlights

Good corporate governance is an essential part of the Company's culture. The Board of Directors annually reviews the Company's key corporate governance documents, including the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Board Committee charters, to ensure that they reflect best practices consistent with the Company's culture and strategy. The creation of a Lead Director position is one recent example of the Company's commitment to corporate governance best practices.

The following table identifies the Company's key corporate governance practices and related information:

Corporate Governance Information

As of August 29, 2014

 Number of Directors 

11

 Number of Independent Directors 

9

 Average Age of Directors 

65

 Average Tenure of Directors 

10 years

 Director Retirement Age 

72 on nomination date

 Lead Director 

Yes

 Stock Ownership Guidelines 

Yes

 Annual Stock Grant to Non Employee Directors 

Yes

 Independent Directors — Executive Sessions 

Yes

 Independent Compensation Consultant 

Yes

 Annual Board and Committee Self Evaluations 

Yes

 Code of Business Ethics and Conduct 

Yes

 Ethics Hotline Policy 

Yes

 Related Person Transaction Policy 

Yes

 Disclosure Committee for Financial Reporting 

Yes

 Annual Advisory Stockholder Approval of Executive Compensation 

Yes

ix


Table of Contents

AAR LOGO

One AAR Place
1100 North Wood Dale Road
Wood Dale, Illinois 60191

We will hold our 20112014 annual meeting of stockholders on Wednesday, October 12, 2011,8, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., Chicago time, at AAR CORP.'s corporate headquarters located at One AAR Place, 1100 North Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois 60191. We cordially invite you to attend the annual meeting and ask that you vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.

Information about the annual meeting is presented below in question-and-answer format.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Why am I receiving the proxy materials?

Our Board of Directors has madeis providing these proxy materials available to you, beginning on or about September 2, 2011,August 29, 2014, in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at the Company's 20112014 annual meeting of stockholders.


What information is contained in the proxy materials?

The proxy materials contain information about the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting, the compensation of our directors and our most highly paid executive officers, corporate governance and other information about the Company.


How do I access the proxy materials electronically?

Again this year we are pleased to be distributing our proxy materials via the Internet under the "notice and access" approach permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). This approach reduces the cost and environmental impact of printing and distributing the proxy materials for our annual meeting.

We mailed a "Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials,"Materials" to all of our stockholders so thaton or about August 29, 2014. The Notice gives you can choosethe choice to receive your proxy materials and vote your shares over the Internet.Internet or receive your proxy materials in printed form and vote by mailing back your proxy card. The Notice provides you with instructions on how to:

This proxy statement, and our Fiscal 2011 annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014 (referred to in this proxy statement as "Fiscal 2014") and our Fiscal 2014 annual report on Form 10-K may be viewed online atwww.proxyvote.com.


Table of Contents


What proposals are stockholders voting on at the annual meeting?

Stockholders will vote on fivethree proposals at the annual meeting:


Table of Contents

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR ALL NOMINEES
on Proposal 1, FOR each of Proposals 2, 4 and 5 and for an annual (1 year) advisory vote on Proposal 3.


Who is entitled to vote?

You are entitled to vote your shares if you were an AAR CORP. stockholder at the close of business on August 19, 2011.2014. This date is sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as the "record date."

Stockholder of Record.If you were a stockholder"stockholder of record (i.e., you held your shares in your own name rather than through a broker, bank or other nominee)record" at the close of business on the record date, you may vote your shares at the 2011 annual meeting. You are a "stockholder of record" if your shares are registered in your name with the Company's transfer agent.

Beneficial Owner.If you were a street-name stockholder (i.e., you held your"beneficial owner" of shares through a broker, bank or other nominee)at the close of business on the record date, you are considered a "beneficial owner" of the stock. Tomay vote those shares at the annual meeting, you must giveby giving voting instructions to your broker, bank or other intermediarynominee who is the "nominee holder""stockholder of record" of your shares. You are a "beneficial owner" of shares if your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee. The Company has directed brokers, banks and other nominee holdersnominees to obtain voting instructions from their beneficial owners. Proxies submitted by nominee holdersnominees on behalf of beneficial owners will count toward a quorum and will be voted as instructed by the beneficial owners. You will receive additional instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee explaining how you may vote your shares held in street name.by your nominee.

A list of stockholders of record entitled to vote will be available at the Company's corporate headquarters located at One AAR Place, 1100 North Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois 60191 for 10 days prior to the meeting and at the meeting location during the meeting.

On the record date, 40,460,58339,891,158 shares of common stock of the Company ("Common Stock") were outstanding. You will haveEach share of common stock is entitled to one vote onfor each proposaldirector nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on for each share of Common Stock you owned onat the record date.annual meeting.


How do stockholders vote by proxy or in person?

Stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date may vote on the matters that are before the annual meeting by proxy by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card or by voting by telephone or over the Internet, or in person by attending and voting at the annual meeting and voting in person.meeting.


How do stockholders vote by telephone or over the Internet?

YouSpecific instructions for using the telephone and Internet voting methods are encouraged to vote either by telephone or overset forth on the Internet. This will eliminate the need to sign, date and return your proxy card. These instructions are designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give your voting instructions and confirm that those instructions have been properly recorded. You canmay vote by telephone or over the Internet 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 10:59 p.m. (Chicago


Table of Contents

(Chicago time) on the day prior to the annual meeting. Specific instructions for using the telephone and Internet voting methods are set forth on the proxy card. If you vote by telephone or over the Internet, please do not return your proxy card.


How do stockholders revoke a proxy?

You may revoke your proxy (e.g., to change your vote) at any time before it is exercised by:


Table of Contents


How will the proxy holders vote the shares?

The proxy holders will vote shares in accordance with instructions on the proxy card. If no instructions are specified,given, the proxy holders will vote the shares as follows:

If any other matter properly comes before the annual meeting, the proxy holders will use their judgment to vote in a manner consistent with the best interest of stockholders. If any director nominee becomes unavailable for election for any reason prior to the annual meeting vote, the Board may reduce the number of directors to be elected or substitute another person as nominee, in which case the proxy holders will vote for the substitute nominee.


How willWhat are the votes be counted?quorum and vote requirements?

All votes cast in person or by proxyA quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be tabulated by the inspectors of election appointed for the annual meeting. Aexist if a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stockcommon stock entitled to vote at the meeting is present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting, will constitute a quorum.

The inspectors of election will treat directions to withhold authority, abstentionsmeeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes, (i.e., whereif any, will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. A "broker non-vote" will occur when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner with respect to a particular matter and such nominee does not possess or choose to exercise hisowner.

Please note that brokers will have discretionary authority with respect to such matter) asvote shares that are present for purposeson the ratification of determining a quorum. Directions to withhold authority will have no effectKPMG; however, brokers may not vote shares on the election of directors because directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be disregarded for purposes of determining whether a proposal has been approved because they are not considered votes cast. It is not anticipated that there will be any broker non-votesor on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP since brokers will have discretionadvisory resolution to vote on this proposal even if they do not receive votingapprove executive compensation without specific instructions from their beneficial owners. Accordingly, please follow your broker's instructions so that your vote may be counted.

Inspectors of election appointed for the annual meeting will tabulate all votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. In the event a quorum is not present at the annual meeting, we expect that the annual meeting will be adjourned or postponed to solicit additional proxies.


Table of Contents

The following table indicates the vote required for approval of each matter to be presented to the stockholders at the annual meeting and the effect of "withhold" votes, abstentions, and broker non-votes.





Required Vote

Effect of "Withhold" Votes,
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes


Proposal 1 —
Election of Class III Directors

Affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of common stock present and entitled to vote (the three nominees who receive the greatest number of votes will be elected directors of the Company).

"Withhold" votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on the voting for the election of directors."

Proposal 2 —
Advisory Resolution to Approve Fiscal 2014 Executive Compensation

Affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present and entitled to vote.

Abstentions will have the effect of a vote "against" and broker non-votes will have no effect on the voting for this matter.

Proposal 3 —
Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP

Affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present and entitled to vote.

Abstentions will have the effect of a vote "against"; there will be no broker non-votes for this matter.


Who is the Company's proxy solicitor?

The Company has engaged D. F. King & Co., Inc., 48 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005, to assist the Company in soliciting proxies at a total estimated cost of $11,500, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The cost of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. D. F. King & Co., Inc. may solicit proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile, e-mail, or in person. Certain officers, directors and employees of the Company may also solicit proxies for no additional compensation.


Table of Contents



PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF OUR DIRECTORS

The Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws provide that the Board of Directors shall consist of between three and 15 directors, with the exact number of directors to be set from time to time by the Board. The number of directors is currently set at 11. The members of the Board are divided into three classes, each having a three-year term that expires in successive years: Class I (three directors), Class II (four directors), and Class III (four directors).

The Board of Directors has nominated four directorsindividuals to be elected inas Class III directors at the annual meeting, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the 20142017 annual meeting or until the individual is succeeded by another qualified director who has been duly elected. The nominees for director in Class III at the annual meeting are Ronald R. Fogleman, Patrick J. Kelly, Peter Pace, Timothy J. Romenesko and Ronald B. Woodard.

Each nominee is currently serving as a director of the Company. Each nominee, other than Mr. Romenesko, has been determined by the Board to be "independent" within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and Securitiesthe SEC. As President and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Under Delaware law and the Company's By-Laws, the four nominees for director who individually receive the greatest number of votes will be elected directorsChief Operating Officer of the Company.Company, Mr. Romenesko does not qualify as an independent director under the NYSE and SEC rules.

THEOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT STOCKHOLDERS
YOU VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF ALL OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES.


Information about theOur Director Nominees and Our Continuing Directors

Information about the director nominees and continuing directors whose terms expire in future years is set forth below:


Director
Since

DIRECTOR NOMINEES:

Class III Directors whose terms expire at the 2011 annual meeting:

RONALD R. FOGLEMAN, 69: Since 1997, President and Chief Operating Officer of B Bar J Cattle & Consulting Company (a consulting company). From 1994 to 1997, General, Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, Washington, D.C.


2001

Current public company directorship: Alliant Techsystems, Inc. (ATK)

Other public company directorship held in the past five years: World Air Holdings, Inc.

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that General Fogleman should serve as a director of the Company based on his leadership skills and record of accomplishment during a 34-year career with the United States Air Force, his business experience and business relationships gained through his senior management positions at two consulting organizations and his understanding of the government defense and services markets.


Table of ContentsOUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Class III Directors whose terms expire at the 2014 annual meeting
 Director
Since

 

PATRICK J. KELLY, 56:59: Since 1986, Managing Director of KMK & Associates, LLC (a private equity firm with interests in companies operating in the food, distribution, technology, financial services, real estate and energy industries).

  
2006
 

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Kelly should serve as a director of the Company based on his leadership and operational experience at various businesses, his background as a long-term chief executive officer and his business expertise gained through his experience at a private equity firm with a diversified portfolio of operating companies.

    

Table of Contents

PETER PACE, 65:68: General, U.S. Marine Corps (Retired). From 2005 to 2007, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

  
20112012
 

Current public company directorship:directorships: Pike Electric Corporation,Corp., Qualys, Inc. and Textura Corporation.

  
 
 

Other public company directorships held in the past five years: Laserlock Technologies, Inc. and Wi2Wi Corporation.


Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that General Pace should serve as a director of the Company based on his leadership and management skills and experience from over 40 years of service with the United States Marine Corps, culminating in his appointment as the sixteenth16th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (the most senior position in the United States Armed Forces), where he served from 2005 to 2007 as the principal military adviser to the President, the Secretary of Defense, the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council.

  

TIMOTHY J. ROMENESKO, 57: Since 2007, President and Chief Operating Officer of AAR CORP. From 1994 to 2007, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AAR CORP. From 1991 to 1994, Corporate Controller of AAR CORP.


2007

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Romenesko should serve as a director of the Company based on his current leadership position as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, his experience in various accounting and financial capacities during his 33-year career with the Company and his knowledge of the Company's commercial aviation and government and defense services markets.


 
 

RONALD B. WOODARD, 68:71: Since 2003, Chairman of MagnaDrive, Inc. (an industrial torque transfer equipment company, which he co-founded following his retirement from The Boeing Company after 32 years). From 1995 to 1998, President of the Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. From 1991 to 1994, Vice President and General Manager of the Renton Division of Boeing Commercial Aircraft. From 1987 to 1991, President of deHavilland Aircraft. Prior to that, Vice President and General Manager of the Materiel Division of Boeing Commercial Aircraft, and various other management positions.

  
2004
 

Current public company directorship: Coinstar, Outerwall, Inc.

  
 
 

Other public company directorshipdirectorships held in the past five years: Coinstar, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc.

  
 
 

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Woodard should serve as a director of the Company based on his original equipmentmanagement and manufacturing experience while atas a senior officer of The Boeing Company, his knowledge of the commercial aviation industry and his experience as a director of other public companies, including Continental Airlines, Inc.

  
 
 

Table of Contents

OUR CONTINUING DIRECTORS


Director
Since

CONTINUING DIRECTORS:

Class I Directors whose terms expire at the 2015 annual meeting


ANTHONY K. ANDERSON, 58: Since 2012, annual meeting:an independent business consultant. From 2006 to April 2012, Vice Chairperson and Managing Partner of Midwest Area at Ernst & Young LLP (a global accounting firm). Prior thereto, served in various management positions during a 35-year career with Ernst & Young LLP.

  
2012

Current public company directorships: Avery Dennison Corp., Exelon Corp. and First American Financial Corporation.


Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Anderson should serve as a director of the Company based on his 35 years working with a global accounting firm, his accounting and financial knowledge, his leadership in developing management talent programs, his service as a director of other public companies, and his professional, civic and charitable service, including as a director of numerous not-for-profit organizations.


 
 

MICHAEL R. BOYCE, 63:66: Since 2005, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PQ Corporation (a specialty chemicals and catalyst company). Since 1998, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Peak Group (an operating and acquisition company). From 1990 to 1998, President and Chief Operating Officer of Harris Chemical Group, Inc. (a chemicals company).

  
2005
 

Current public company directorship: Stepan Company.

  
 
 

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Boyce should serve as a director of the Company based on his experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of two leading global organizations, his insight into global manufacturing, supply and distribution practices and his international business development skills.

  
 
 

JAMES G. BROCKSMITH, JR., 70: Since 1996, an independent business consultant. From 1990 to 1996, Deputy Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of KPMG LLP (a global accounting firm), from which he retired after 31 years.


2001

Current public company directorship: Sempra Energy.

Other public company directorship held in the past five years: Alberto Culver Company.

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Brocksmith should serve as a director of the Company based on his previous leadership position at KPMG, his knowledge of corporate accounting, tax and compliance practices and his expertise in financial and accounting issues relevant to the Company's businesses.


Table of Contents


Director
Since

DAVID P. STORCH, 58:61: Since 2007, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of AAR CORP. From 2005 untilto 2007, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of AAR CORP. From 1996 to 2005, President and Chief Executive Officer of AAR CORP. From 1989 to 1996, President and Chief Operating Officer of AAR CORP. From 1988 to 1989, Vice President of AAR CORP.

  
1989
 

Current public company directorships: KapStone Paper and Packaging Corp. and Unitrin, Inc.Kemper Corporation.

  
 
 

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Storch should serve as a director of the Company based on his current position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, his leadership and management skills, his understanding of the Company's businesses gained during his 33-year35-year career with the Company, his knowledge of the commercial aviation and government and defense services markets, and his leadership role in transforming the Company into a leading international provider of products and services to the commercial aviation and government and defense services markets, with front-end manufacturing and after-market support to domestic and international customers.

  
 
 

Table of Contents



Class II Directors whose terms expire at the 20132016 annual meeting:meeting


NORMAN R. BOBINS, 68:71: Since 2008, Non-Executive Chairman of The PrivateBank and Trust Company - Chicago (a financial services company). and Chief Executive Officer of Norman Bobins Consulting, LLC. From May 2007 until October 2007, Chairman of the Board of LaSalle Bank Corporation. From 2002 to 2007, President and Chief Executive Officer of LaSalle Bank Corporation. From 2006 to 2007, President and Chief Executive Officer of ABN AMRO North America. From 2002 to 2007, Senior Executive Vice President at ABN AMRO Bank N.V., the Dutch parent of LaSalle Bank Corporation.

  
2007
 

Current public company directorships: The AGL Resources Inc., Aviv REIT, Inc., PrivateBancorp, Inc., and SIMS Metal Management LimitedLimited.


Other public company directorships held in the past five years: Global Hyatt Corp. and Nicor Inc.

  
 
 

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Bobins should serve as a director of the Company based on his 4244 years of banking experience, his financial and accounting knowledge, his service as a director of other public companies, and his civic involvement as a director of various not-for-profit organizations.

  

RONALD R. FOGLEMAN, 72: Since 1997, President and Chief Operating Officer of B Bar J Cattle & Consulting Company (a consulting company). From 1994 to 1997, General, Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, Washington, D.C.


2001

Current public company directorship: Alliant Techsystems, Inc.


Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that General Fogleman should serve as a director of the Company based on his leadership skills and record of accomplishment during a 34-year career with the United States Air Force, his business experience and business relationships gained through his senior management positions at two consulting organizations, his understanding of the government defense and services markets and his service as a director of other public companies. General Fogleman was elected as the Company's Lead Director in April 2013.

  

Table of Contents


Director
Since

JAMES E. GOODWIN, 67:70: Since 2009, Chairman of Federal Signal Corporation (a safety and security products manufacturer). From 2007 to 2008, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Federal Signal Corporation. From 2001 to 2007, an independent business consultant. From 1999 to 2001, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of UAL, Inc. and United Airlines, Inc., from which he retired after 34 years. From 1998 to 1999, President and Chief Operating Officer of United Airlines, Inc. From 1992 to 1998, Senior Vice President of United Airlines, Inc.

  2002 

Current public company directorships: Federal Signal Corporation and John Bean Technologies Corporation.

  
 
 

Other public company directorship held in the past five years: First Chicago Bancorp.

  
 
 

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Goodwin should serve as a director of the Company based on his airline industry experience and expertise, including his leadership positions at UAL, Inc. and United Airlines, Inc., his management experience and his financial expertise, as well as his global consulting experience and his service as a director of other public companies.

  

TIMOTHY J. ROMENESKO, 54: Since 2007, President and Chief Operating Officer of AAR CORP. From 1994 to 2007, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AAR CORP. From 1991 to 1994, Corporate Controller of AAR CORP.


2007

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Romenesko should serve as a director of the Company based on his current leadership position as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, his experience in various accounting and financial capacities during his 29-year career with the Company and his knowledge of the Company's commercial aviation and government and defense services markets.

  

MARC J. WALFISH, 59:62: Since 2003, Founding Partner of Merit Capital Partners (a mezzanine investor company) in 2003.. From 1991 to 2003, partner at William Blair Mezzanine Capital Partners. From 1978 to 1991, various positions at Prudential Capital Corporation, most recently as Senior Vice President.

  
2003
 

Director Qualifications: The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Walfish should serve as a director of the Company based on his experience in the finance industry, including as a founding partner of Merit Capital Partners, a mezzanine investor company, his knowledge of the capital markets and his expertise in corporate finance, strategic planning and risk management.

  
 
 

Table of Contents



PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY VOTE ONRESOLUTION TO
APPROVE OUR FISCAL 2014 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are asking our stockholders to approve anthe following advisory resolution (commonly known as a say-on-pay proposal) on the compensation awarded to our five named executive officers for Fiscal 2011,2014 as disclosed in this proxy statement:

We encourage our stockholders to read the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" beginning on page 32pages 27-50 and the "Summary Compensation Table" and other related compensation tables and related narrative beginningstarting on page 52 of this proxy statement. These sections describe our executive compensation policies and practices and provide detailed information about the compensation of our named executive officers.

Our Compensation CommitteeAs described under "Stockholder Outreach Program" in the "2014 Proxy Statement Summary" and Board of Directors believe that:"Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the Company conducted a stockholder outreach program in Fiscal 2014 to understand, consider and respond to stockholder concerns. With respect to executive compensation matters, the Company's key actions in Fiscal 2014 included the following:


Table of Contents

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote"FOR" the Company's successful business results, including in Fiscal 2011: (i) a 34.9% increase in net sales to $1.78 billion; (ii) a 56.5% increase in net income to $69.8 million; and (iii) a 49.1% increase in diluted earnings per share to $1.73.

Accordingly, we ask that you consider and vote on the following advisory resolution:

This advisory resolution, commonly known as a "say on pay"Our stockholders, upon the recommendation of our Board of Directors, previously voted that our say-on-pay proposal should be considered by stockholders at each annual meeting given the importance of the Company's executive compensation program. While the say-on-pay vote is not binding on the Board of Directors. TheDirectors, the Board however, will reviewreviews and considerconsiders the results of the "say on pay"say-on-pay vote (as it did in response to the Fiscal 2013 say-on-pay vote), the opinions of our stockholders and other relevant factors in making future decisions regarding the Company's executive compensation program.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR
THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.


Table Our stockholders will vote next on the frequency of Contents


PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY
OF FUTURE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION VOTES

We are asking our stockholderssay-on-pay proposal (i.e., whether to hold a say-on-pay vote on how frequently the advisory vote on executive compensation (the subject of Proposal 2 above) should be presented to our stockholders, as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You may vote your shares to have the advisory vote on executive compensation held every year,annually, every two years or every three years, or you may abstain from voting.

Our Compensation Committee and Boardyears) at our 2017 annual meeting of Directors believe that holding an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual (1 year) basis is the most appropriate policy for the Company and its stockholders. Decisions on our executive compensation policies and practices are made annually, and an annual (1 year) vote will permit our stockholders to provide direct and timely feedback to the Company's Board and management on these important issues.

Accordingly, we ask that you consider and vote on the following advisory resolution:

    "RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the holding of an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual (1 year) basis."

This advisory vote is not binding on the Board of Directors. The Board, however, will review and consider the voting results and other relevant factors in recommending a voting frequency to stockholders.

THEOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERSYOU VOTEFOR
VOTE TO HOLD THE ADVISORY VOTE ONRESOLUTION TO APPROVE OUR FISCAL 2014 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ON AN ANNUAL (1 YEAR) BASIS.COMPENSATION.


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL 4 — APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AAR CORP. STOCK
BENEFIT PLAN TO ADD SECTION 162(m) PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Proposed Amendment

We are asking our stockholders to approve an amendment to the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan (the "Plan"). The amendment will add performance criteria to the Plan so that performance-based stock awards under the Plan are tax deductible for the Company under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). This amendment was unanimously adopted by the Board of Directors, subject to stockholder approval.

Under Section 162(m), compensation paid to a company's named executive officers in any one year in excess of $1 million must qualify as "performance-based compensation" in order to be tax deductible. Qualification under Section 162(m) requires that the material terms of the performance goals under which compensation may be paid must be disclosed to and approved by a company's stockholders. In addition, if the targets under a performance goal may be changed, the material terms must be re-approved every five years. The Company's stockholders last approved the performance criteria relating to equity awards under the Plan at the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders.

Section 162(m) provides that the material terms of the performance goals include:

    The individuals eligible to receive compensation;

    A description of the business criteria on which the performance goals are based; and

    The maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an individual under the performance goals.

Each of these material terms is described below. Stockholder approval of the amendment constitutes approval of each material term for purposes of the approval requirements of Section 162(m).

Individuals Eligible to Receive Compensation.    The Compensation Committee administers the Plan. It has the authority to determine the key employees and non-employee directors to whom awards are to be granted under the Plan. All non-employee directors and all employees, officers and other employees with executive, managerial, supervisory or professional responsibilities (which includes the five named executive officers) are eligible for the grant of awards under the Plan. In Fiscal 2011, 112 employees, including the five named executive officers and nine non-employee directors, received awards under the Plan.

Description of the Business Criteria on Which the Performance Goals Are Based.    Awards that the Compensation Committee seek to qualify as "performance-based compensation" will be subject to the attainment of performance goals based on one or more of the following business criteria, as selected and defined by the Compensation Committee: earnings, earnings per share or earnings per share growth; earnings before interest and taxes, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization; stock price; total stockholder return; return on assets; net asset turnover; return on capital or return on invested capital; return on equity; cash flow; net income; profit margin; market share; expense management; revenue; revenue growth; stockholder equity; leverage ratio; investment rating; and debt coverage; provided, that these criteria shall include


Table of Contents


any derivations of the foregoing (e.g., net income shall include pre-tax income). Any of these criteria may be used to measure the performance of the Company as a whole or any business unit or division of the Company. Performance criteria may be stated in absolute terms or relative to comparison companies or indices to be achieved during a given time period.

The Compensation Committee may provide, at the time it establishes the performance goals for any award, that any evaluation of performance shall include or exclude any one or more of the following events that occurs during a performance period: (i) significant acquisitions or dispositions of business or assets by the Company; (ii) litigation, judgments or settlements; (iii) the effect of changes in the tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results; (iv) any reorganization or restructuring programs; (v) extraordinary items as described in FASB ASC Section 225-20-20; (vi) significant, non-recurring charges or credits; and (vii) foreign exchange rates.

Maximum Amount of Compensation.    Subject to certain adjustments, the aggregate number of shares subject to awards intended to qualify as performance-based that are granted under the Plan during any one year to any one participant shall not exceed 300,000 shares.


Summary of the Plan

General.    The Plan, previously approved by stockholders, was amended and restated by the Board of Directors in 2001. The Board of Directors has subsequently amended the Plan, including most recently in July 2011 to include performance-based compensation provisions, as discussed above, and to add restricted stock units to the types of awards eligible for grant under the Plan. The following is a summary of the current Plan.

Administration.    The Compensation Committee administers the Plan and has the authority to determine the key employees and non-employee directors to whom awards are to be granted under the Plan, the types and amount of awards, the term of each award and other terms and conditions of each award, including the applicable vesting schedule, and the number of shares of common stock covered by an award.

Available Shares.    As of May 31, 2011, 3,766,606 shares of our Common Stock were available for issuance under the Plan (this number reflects the shares not subject to outstanding awards). Any shares subject to an award that are not issued due to a lapse, expiration or cancellation of the award, or that are issued pursuant to a restricted stock award that is subsequently cancelled or forfeited will again be available for issuance pursuant to subsequent awards. Shares delivered by the participant or withheld by the Company as payment of the exercise price or withholding taxes for an option will again be available for issuance pursuant to subsequent awards. Shares delivered as payment of any withholding taxes for a restricted stock award will not again be available for issuance under the Plan. The Compensation Committee will adjust this maximum annual award limit in the case of a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination of shares, exchange of shares or other change affecting the outstanding shares in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be provided under the Plan.

Awards.    The Plan provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights. To date, the Company has granted stock options and restricted stock but has not granted any restricted stock units or stock appreciation rights. Beginning


Table of Contents


July 15, 2002, the Plan provides that only non-qualified stock options (as opposed to incentive stock options) may be granted under the Plan.

Stock Options:    The Compensation Committee may grant non-qualified stock options to key employees and non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee has discretion to set the terms and conditions of each stock option, provided that: (i) the exercise price of an option will be the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of the grant, (ii) each option will expire no later than ten years from the date of grant, and (iii) the option is subject to certain vesting and exercise provisions set forth in the Plan in the case of a participant's death, disability or retirement (as defined in the Plan).

Restricted Stock:    The Compensation Committee also may grant awards of restricted stock to key employees and non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee has discretion to set the terms and conditions, including the restrictions on transfer of the award. A participant will be a stockholder with respect to the shares of restricted stock awarded to him, and will have the rights of a stockholder, although dividends otherwise payable on any performance-based restricted stock awards will be held by the Company and will be paid only to the extent the restrictions on the shares lapse, and the Compensation Committee has the discretion to hold dividends on other restricted stock awards until the restrictions lapse. In the case of restricted stock granted in tandem with an option, the exercise of an option results in a forfeiture of the restricted stock related to the option, and the lapse of restrictions on the restricted stock results in the cancellation of the unexercised related option.

Restricted Stock Units:    The Compensation Committee may grant restricted stock units to key employees and non-employee directors. Each restricted stock unit entitles the participant to receive, on a specified date or event set forth in the award agreement, one share of common stock or cash equal to the fair market value of one share on such date or event, as provided in the award agreement. The number of restricted stock units awarded to each participant, and the terms and conditions of the award, will be at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. A participant will not be a stockholder with respect to the restricted stock units awarded to him prior to the date they are settled in shares of common stock. The award agreement may provide that until the restrictions lapse, the participant will be paid an amount equal to the dividends that would have been paid had the restricted stock units been actual shares (although such dividend equivalents payable on any performance-based restricted stock units will be held by the Company and paid only to the extent the restrictions lapse, and the Compensation Committee has the discretion to hold such amounts payable on any other restricted stock units until the restrictions lapse).

Stock Appreciation Rights:    The Compensation Committee may grant stock appreciation rights ("SARs") to key employees. SARs may be granted in tandem with a related stock option (a "tandem SAR") or as a separate award (a "non-tandem SAR"). A tandem SAR will be exercisable only at the same time as the related option and will be subject to the same restrictions applicable to such option. A tandem SAR will expire upon exercise of a related option and a related option will expire upon exercise of the tandem SAR. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to set the terms and conditions of an SAR, provided that (i) the exercise price of each SAR will be the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant and (ii) the SAR is subject to certain vesting and exercise provisions set forth in the Plan in the case of a participant's death, disability or retirement (as defined in the Plan). Upon exercise of an


Table of Contents


SAR, a participant will receive the following amount, in the form of cash or shares, as determined by the Compensation Committee: (i) in the case of a non-tandem SAR, the difference between the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise, and the exercise price of the SAR, multiplied by the number of shares for which the SAR is exercised; or (ii) in the case of a tandem SAR, the difference between the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the related stock option, multiplied by the number of shares for which the SAR is exercised.

Payment and Withholding Taxes.    A participant may pay the exercise price of a stock option and/or the withholding taxes due with respect to an award by one or more of the following payment methods: (i) cash; (ii) cash received from a broker-dealer to whom the participant has submitted an exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to deliver promptly to the Company the amount of sales proceeds from the sale of the shares subject to the award to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes; (iii) delivery of shares (either subject to the award or already owned) that have an aggregate fair market value equal to the exercise price or withholding taxes; (iv) or by directing the Company to withhold shares otherwise issuable in connection with the award having a fair market value equal to the exercise price or withholding taxes.

Change in Control.    If a change in control of the Company does not have the prior written approval of a majority of the Board, the following rules will apply to awards made to key employees: (i) in the case of non-tandem awards, all outstanding stock options and SARs will vest and be exercisable and all restrictions on restricted stock and restricted stock units will lapse; and (ii) in the case of tandem awards, a participant may elect whether the restrictions on tandem restricted stock will lapse (in which case the related option will expire), or whether the option will be immediately exercisable (in which case the related restricted stock will be forfeited). If a change in control is approved by a majority of the Board, the Compensation Committee will decide whether outstanding stock options and SARs will vest and be exercisable and/or all restrictions on restricted stock will lapse, or the awards will be exchanged for similar awards of the surviving or acquiring corporation. If a non-employee director's membership on the Board terminates within one year following a change in control that did not have the prior written approval of a majority of the Board, all outstanding stock options will vest and be exercisable and all restrictions on restricted stock and restricted stock units will lapse.

Amendment or Termination of Plan.    The Board of Directors may terminate, suspend or modify the Plan, without the authorization of the stockholders, to the extent allowed by law, provided that neither the Plan nor any award agreement can be amended in a way that results in the repricing of a stock option without stockholder approval. No termination, suspension or modification of the Plan may adversely affect any rights of a holder of an award granted under the Plan before the date of such termination, suspension or modification without the consent of such holder.

Federal Income Tax Consequences.    The following is a summary of the federal income tax consequences of the Plan. It is based on the federal tax laws and regulations currently in effect and existing administrative rules of the Internal Revenue Service. Participants also may be subject to state and local taxes in connection with the grant of awards under the Plan. Participants should consult with their individual tax advisors to determine the tax consequences associated with awards granted under the Plan. This information may not be applicable to employees of foreign subsidiaries or to employees who are not residents of the United States.


Table of Contents

Nonqualified Stock Options.    A participant will not recognize any income upon the grant of a nonqualified stock option. On the date the participant exercises the nonqualified stock option, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price (the amount paid for the shares). The participant will be responsible for remitting to the Company any withholding tax obligation that arises at the time the option is exercised. The Company generally will receive a tax deduction for the same amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes. The participant's tax basis for the shares acquired upon exercise will be the exercise price paid for the shares plus the amount of ordinary income recognized. When the participant sells these shares, any gain or loss recognized is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on whether the participant has held the shares for more than one year.

Restricted Stock/Restricted Stock Units.    If a participant receives a restricted stock award, he will recognize ordinary income upon becoming entitled to transfer the shares of common stock at the end of the restriction period without forfeiture or, if earlier, when there is no substantial risk of forfeiture of the common stock. A participant generally will recognize ordinary income when he receives shares or cash pursuant to the settlement of stock units, provided that if the shares are subject to any further restrictions on transfer, the participant will recognize ordinary income upon becoming entitled to transfer the shares at the end of the restriction period without forfeiture. In each case, the amount of income recognized will be equal to the fair market value of the shares or cash received on such date less the amount, if any, the participant paid for the shares. This amount will also be the participant's tax basis for the shares. The participant will be responsible for remitting to the Company the withholding tax obligation that arises at the time the ordinary income is recognized. In addition, the holding period begins on the day the restrictions lapse for purposes of determining whether the participant has long-term or short-term capital gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the shares. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction with respect to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.

Stock Appreciation Rights.    A participant will not recognize any income at the time of the grant of an SAR. Upon exercise of the SAR, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount received upon exercise. The participant will be responsible for remitting to the Company the withholding tax obligation that arises at the time the ordinary income is recognized. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction with respect to the ordinary income the participant recognizes.


Awards Granted Under the Plan

It is not possible at this time to determine the specific awards that will be made in Fiscal 2012 and future years under the Plan. As of August 1, 2011, a total of 13,624,302 stock options with exercise prices ranging from $3.20 to $34.02 have been granted under the Plan since it was first adopted. Included in this number are grants as follows: David P. Storch (Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and a 33-year employee): 4,218,044; Timothy J. Romenesko (President and Chief Operating Officer and a 29-year employee): 504,900; Richard J. Poulton (Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer): 108,357; Terry D. Stinson (Group Vice President — Structures and Systems): 30,000; Robert J. Regan (Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary): 58,357; all current executive officers as a group: 4,919,658; all current non-employee directors as a group: 71,500; all current nominees for election as a director as a group: 20,500; and all current employees as a group (excluding current executive officers): 8,704,644. On August 1,


Table of Contents


2011, the last reported sales price for the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $29.11 per share.


Vote Required for Approval

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and voting at the annual meeting is required to approve the amendment to the Plan.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS
VOTEFOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN TO ADD SECTION 162(m)
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA.


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of May 31, 2011 with respect to the Company's compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance (shares in thousands):

 
 
  
  
 Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(a)

  
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)

  
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)

  

  

 Equity compensation plans approved by securities holders    1,994   $18.56    3,767  

  

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders

              

  

 

Total

    1,994   $18.56    3,767  

Table of Contents


PROPOSAL 53 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP 
AS THE
COMPANY'SOUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Company's independent registered public accounting firm reports to, and is engaged at the direction of, the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee appointed KPMG LLP ("KPMG") as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2011,2015, after consideration and determination of KPMG's independence in light of all services rendered to the Company and its past performance as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The Board of Directors asks that stockholders ratify the appointment of KPMG as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2011.2015. Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the annual meeting, with the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to respond to appropriate questions of stockholders.


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by KPMG to the Company for Fiscal 20112013 and Fiscal 20102014 for audit, audit-related tax, and othertax services provided by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. As noted, audit fees decreased in Fiscal 2011, principally as a result of additional assistance provided by the Company's internal audit department.

 
 
 Description of Fees
  
 Fiscal 2011 ($)
  
 Fiscal 2010 ($)
  

  

 Audit Fees    1,275,000    1,490,000  

  

 Audit-Related Fees1    63,386    243,090  

  

 Tax Fees2    335,536    268,588  

  

 All Other Fees3    0    40,000  
 
 
 Description of Fees
  
 Fiscal 2013 ($)
  
 Fiscal 2014 ($)
  

  

 

Audit Fees

    1,689,980    1,794,370  

  

 Audit-Related Fees1    136,375    136,000  

  

 Tax Fees2    373,317    387,109  
1
Audit-relatedFiscal 2013 audit-related fees in Fiscal 2011 were for atwo comfort letterletters, purchase price allocation and related acquisition work, technical research and statutory audits of foreign subsidiaries. Audit-relatedFiscal 2014 audit-related fees in Fiscal 2010 were for a comfort letter, statutory audits of foreign subsidiaries andtwo consents on registration statement filings, acquisition due diligence.diligence assistance and SEC comment letter services.

2
Tax fees include domestic and foreign income tax return reviews.

3
All other fees represent consultation and assistance regarding government contract accounting.

Audit Committee pre-approval is required for any audit, audit-related, tax or other services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.


Vote Required for Ratification

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and voting at the annual meeting is required to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.

THEOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS
YOU VOTEFOR
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG AS THEOUR
COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.FIRM FOR FISCAL 2015.


Table of Contents


Audit Committee Report for Fiscal 20112014

On May 31, 2011, theThe Audit Committee was comprised of six independent directors. The Board has determined that each memberreviews the Company's financial reporting process on behalf of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaningBoard of the applicable SEC regulations, NYSE rules and the Company's Categorical Standards and Policy for Determining Director Independence.

Directors. The Company's management is primarily responsible for the Company's financial statements and the quality and integrity of the reporting process and systems of internal control. The Company's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the Company's financial statements and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and for expressing opinions thereon. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting or other advisors, as the Audit Committee deems necessary, to carry out its duties with funding from the Company.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011Fiscal 2014 with the Company's management and representatives of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, including a discussion of the reasonableness of significant judgments and accounting estimates, and clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee also reviewed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures contained in the Company's earnings announcements and quarterly reports. Management has represented to the Audit Committee that the Company's financial statements were prepared in accordance with the United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and the independent registered public accounting firm has expressed an opinion based on their audit that the financial statements are in conformance with GAAP in all material respects. The Audit Committee is not responsible for planning or conducting audits, or the determination that the Company's financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with GAAP. That is the responsibility of management and the independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm and management the overall scope and plans for the audit, the quality, adequacy and assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, and the Internal Audit Department's management, organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. The Audit Committee also met with the independent registered public accounting firm representatives without management present and discussed the results of their audits, their evaluation of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls and the overall quality (not just acceptability) of the Company's accounting policies and financial reporting.

The Audit Committee also discussed with the representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm (i) the matters required to be discussed by Statement onPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing StandardsStandard No. 16 ("SAS"), No. 61,Communications with Audit Committees,Committees") as amended by SAS 90Audit Committee Communications,, and (ii) the independent registered public accounting firm's independence from the Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures and letter furnished to the Audit Committee by the independent registered public accounting firm and required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, andBoard. The Audit Committee determined that the non-audit services provided to the Company by the independent registered public accounting firm are compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm's independence.


Table of Contents

In reliance on its review of the audited financial statements and the discussions referred to above and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee referred to above and in its charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011Fiscal 2014 for filing with the SEC.


Table of Contents

The Audit Committee also reviewed and assessed the adequacy of the Audit Committee Chartercharter and conducted an Audit Committee self-assessment in which it concluded that the Committee operates effectively and successfully carried out all of its Chartercharter responsibilities.

Respectfully submitted,

Audit Committee

    James E. Goodwin, Chairman
    Anthony K. Anderson
    Norman R. Bobins
    James G. Brocksmith, Jr.
    Patrick J. Kelly
    Marc J. Walfish
    Ronald B. Woodard


Table of Contents



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General

The Company is committed to good corporate governance. We regularly review our policies and procedures, giving due consideration to current developments and "best practices." We believe that we comply with all applicable SEC and NYSE rules and regulations, and we have adopted additional corporate governance practices that we believe are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Copies of the following corporate governance documents are available on the Company's website atwww.aarcorp.com under "Investor Relations/Corporate Governance":

    Corporate Governance Guidelines

    Categorical Standards and Policy for Determining Director Independence

    Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

    Audit Committee Charter

    Compensation Committee Charter

    Nominating and Governance Committee Charter

    Executive Committee Charter

    Conflict Minerals Policy

These corporate governance documents are also available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the Company's address listed on the first page of this proxy statement.

The Company maintains an Ethics Assist LineHotline through aan independent third-party provider to receive confidential complaints, information, suggestions or recommendations concerning the Company, its officers, directors, and employees, policies, procedures, employment and business practices, accounting or audit matters, financial reporting or compliance with other Company policies or applicable regulatory or legal requirements. The Ethics Assist LineHotline is toll-free and permits callers to identify themselves or remain anonymous at their election.


Director Independence

A majority of the members of the Board of Directors must be independent directors under the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable NYSE rules. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors review each director annually and make a determination concerning independence after consideration of all known facts and circumstances. The Board has established categorical standards to assist it in determining director independence. The Company's "Categorical Standards and Policy for Determining Director Independence" include all of the elements of the applicable SEC and NYSE rules with respect to director independence, as well as those of the Company, and are attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement. Based on these categorical standards, its review of all relevant facts and information available, and the recommendations of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board, at its meeting in July 2011, affirmatively determined that no director has a material relationship with the Company that would impair the director's ability to exercise independent judgment and, accordingly, that each director is an independent director, except for David P. Storch, due to his status as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive


Table of Contents


Officer of the Company, and Timothy J. Romenesko, due to his status as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Under the NYSE rules, a director employed by the Company is not an independent director by definition.


Board Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors determines the leadership structure for the Board and the Company in a manner that it believes best serves the interests of the Company's stockholders. The Board has no fixed policy with respect to combining or separating the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Currently, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, David P. Storch, is also Chairman of the Board. The Board believes this structure is the most effective and appropriate leadership structure for the Board and the Company at this time for the following principal reasons:

    Mr. Storch is the second Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in the Company's 60-year history. This stability at the most senior executive position within the Company has served the Company well and contributed to its ability to adapt and react to recurrent business cycles in the commercial aviation and government and defense services markets.

    Mr. Storch has served the Company in senior management positions for over 20 years (beginning in 1989 as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, his assumption of the Chief Executive Officer title in 1996, his assumption of the Chairman of the Board title in 2005 and continuing through his current position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer).

    Mr. Storch's combination of expertise and experience provides the Company with a unique skill-set, including his knowledge of the commercial aviation and government and defense services markets; his understanding of the Company's culture, businesses, employees and customers; and his leadership role in the Company's transformation from a supplier of aircraft parts and aftermarket services for commercial airlines into a leading international provider of products and services to the commercial aviation and government and defense services markets, with both front-end manufacturing and after-market support to domestic and international customers.

    As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Storch leads the Board and senior management in the development and implementation of the Company's business strategy and its relationships with its core constituents, including its stockholders, customers and employees.

    The Board of Directors, particularly the non-management directors, provides substantial independent oversight of the conduct of the Company's business. The Company does not have a lead director in title, but the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee (currently, Ronald R. Fogleman) acts in that capacity and chairs all executive sessions of the non-management directors. The non-management directors meet regularly in executive sessions, including at every regularly scheduled Board meeting, after which the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee briefs Mr. Storch, as appropriate.

    The Board of Directors conducts an annual evaluation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer that focuses on Mr. Storch's performance in carrying out the responsibilities of the two positions. In Fiscal 2011, the Board concluded at this evaluation

Table of Contents

      that Mr. Storch's performance as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer continues to justify maintaining the combined position.


Risk Management Oversight

The Board of Directors, directly and through its committees, is responsible for overseeing management's process for assessing and managing the Company's exposure to risks. In that role, the Board regularly reviews and responds to management's business strategies and initiatives, the Company's quarterly and annual financial results and information relating to the Company's competitive position, customer base, and capital and liquidity position. The Board meets each year with senior management to review and discuss the Company's strategic plan. This meeting includes an assessment of the key challenges and risks of the Company's businesses, and the opportunities for addressing and responding to these challenges and risks.

The Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board, oversees the enterprise risk management committee, which is responsible for identifying the principal risks to the Company, developing and implementing risk mitigation strategies and reporting to the Audit Committee. In Fiscal 2011, the enterprise risk management committee reviewed and discussed with the Audit Committee the Company's principal risks and outlined its risk mitigation approach for addressing these risks. The Audit Committee reviews and reports to the Board on risks relating to accounting, financial reporting and legal compliance, risks identified by the Company's internal and external auditors, and matters raised through the Company's Ethics Assist Line. The Compensation Committee oversees and reports to the Board on the Company's incentive compensation programs to assure that they are appropriately structured to incentivize officers and key employees while assuring appropriate risk. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees and reports to the Board on corporate governance risks, including director independence and related party transactions.

The Board and its committees receive information from and have regular access to the individual members of management responsible for managing risk, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Group Vice Presidents, Controller, General Counsel and Internal Auditor. The directors also meet each quarter with a broader group of the Company's employees at regularly scheduled Board dinners as an informal way of learning more about the Company's businesses and its employees.


Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board, the Chairman of the Board, independent directors as a group, or any individual director or Committee Chairman by mail addressed to:

    AAR CORP.
    Attention: Independent Directors (or the name of the individual director)
    c/o Corporate Secretary
    One AAR Place
    1100 North Wood Dale Road
    Wood Dale, Illinois 60191

The independent members of the Board of Directors have approved procedures for the processing, review and disposition of all communications sent by stockholders or other interested parties to the Board of Directors.


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to codify long-standing policies and procedures and to demonstrate its commitment to corporate governance best practices. These Guidelines, under the administration of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, address director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, management evaluation and succession, and the annual performance evaluation of the Board of Directors. These Guidelines are reviewed annually by the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors.


Director Nominations and Qualifications

The Board of Directors, acting through theits Nominating and Governance Committee, is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending candidates for director. The Nominating and Governance Committee obtains recommendations from management, other directors, business and community leaders and stockholders, and may retain the services of a consultant to assist in identifying candidates. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers all director candidates in the same manner, including director candidates recommended by stockholders, regardless of the source of the recommendation. In its evaluation of director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the factors specified in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, including:

    A high level of integrity and professional and personal ethics and values consistent with those of the Company;

    Professional background and relevant business and industry experience;

Table of Contents

    Current employment, leadership experience and other board service;

    Demonstrated business acumen or special technical skills or expertise (e.g., auditing,audit, financial, legal or aviation/aerospace)aviation and government/defense), particularly in areas where the Board currently lacks specific skills;

    A commitment to enhancing stockholder value and serving the interests of all stockholders;

    Independence (including within the meaning of the applicable NYSE rules) and freedom from any conflicts of interest that would interfere with a director's ability to discharge his duties; and

    Willingness and ability to make the commitment of time and attention necessary for effective Board service;

    A balance of business, financial and other experience, expertise, capabilities and perspectives among sitting directors in the context of the current composition of the Board, operating requirements of the Company and long-term interests of stockholders; and

    A high level of integrityOther factors the Nominating and professional and personal ethics and values consistent with those of the Company.Governance Committee deems appropriate.

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers the racial, ethnic and gender diversity of the Board and director candidates, as well as the diversity of their knowledge, skills, experience, background and perspective, to assure that the Company maintains the benefit of a diverse, balanced and effective Board. In Fiscal 2011, the Board engaged an independent executive search firm to consider Board diversity and to provide information on the identification and recruitment of women and minority Board candidates. The Board expressed its view that Board diversity is a key priority for the Company, to be addressed no later than the next director vacancy.


Table of Contents

A full list of the qualifications of director candidates considered by the Committee is set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines on the Company's website atwww.aarcorp.com under "Investor Relations/Corporate Governance" and is available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the address listed on the first page of this proxy statement. The Nominating and Governance Committee regularly reviews these qualifications and the performance of individual directors and the Board as a whole.

Following its evaluation of director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommends its director nominees to the Board of Directors. Based on its review and consideration of the Committee's recommendation, the Board makes the final determination of director nominees to be elected by the Company's stockholders.

Stockholders may submit a proposed nomination to the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration with respect to the 20122015 annual meeting of stockholders by writing to the Secretary, AAR CORP., One AAR Place, 1100 North Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois 60191. To be considered, proposed nominations must be received by the Secretary of the Company no later than April 18, 2012,11, 2015, must state the reasons for the proposed nomination and contain the information required under the Company's By-Laws, including the full name and address of each proposed nominee, as well as a brief biographical history setting forth past and present directorships, employment and occupations, information as to stock ownership, other arrangements regarding the Common Stock,common stock, and any other qualifications. Proposed nominations must also include a statement indicating that the proposed nominees have consented to being named in the proxy statement and to serve if elected.


Table of Contents


Director Independence

A majority of the members of the Board of Directors must be independent directors under the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable SEC and NYSE rules. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors review each director annually and make a determination concerning independence after consideration of all known facts and circumstances. The Board has established categorical standards to assist it in determining director independence. The Company's "Categorical Standards for Determining Director Independence" include all of the elements of the applicable SEC and NYSE rules with respect to director independence, as well as those of the Company, and are available on the Company's website. Based on these categorical standards, its review of all relevant facts and information available, and the recommendations of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board, at its meeting in July 2014, affirmatively determined that no director has a material relationship with the Company that would impair the director's ability to exercise independent judgment and, accordingly, that each director is an independent director, except for David P. Storch, due to his status as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Timothy J. Romenesko, due to his status as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Under the NYSE rules, a director employed by the Company is not an independent director by definition.


Board Leadership and Lead Director

The Board of Directors determines the leadership structure for the Board and the Company in a manner that it believes best serves the interests of the Company's stockholders.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines provides that the Board shall have a Lead Director elected by the independent directors. The Lead Director chairs all executive sessions of the independent directors and works closely with the Chief Executive Officer on Board agendas, schedules and meetings. Ronald R. Fogleman, Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, currently serves as the Board's Lead Director.

The Board has no fixed policy with respect to combining or separating the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Currently, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, David P. Storch, is also Chairman of the Board. The Board continues to believe having Mr. Storch as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is the most effective and appropriate leadership structure for the Board and the Company at this time for the following principal reasons:

    Mr. Storch is the second Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in the Company's 63-year history. This stability at the most senior executive position within the Company has had a strong and positive impact on the Company's culture and contributed to the Company's ability to respond to business cycles in the commercial aviation and government and defense services markets.

    Mr. Storch has served the Company in senior management positions for 25 years (beginning in 1989 as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company and continuing with his assumption of the Chief Executive Officer title in 1996 and his assumption of the Chairman of the Board title in 2005).

    Mr. Storch's expertise and experience provides the Company with a unique skill-set, including: his knowledge of the commercial aviation and government and defense services

Table of Contents

      markets; his shaping of the Company's culture; his understanding of the Company's businesses, employees and customers; and his leadership role in the Company's transformation from a supplier of aircraft parts and aftermarket services for commercial airlines into a leading international provider of products and services to the commercial aviation and government and defense services markets.

    The Board of Directors provides substantial independent oversight of the conduct of the Company's business, including through the interaction and communication between the Lead Director and the Chief Executive Officer. The independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions, including at every regularly scheduled Board meeting, after which the Lead Director briefs Mr. Storch, as appropriate.

    The Board of Directors conducts an annual evaluation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer that focuses on Mr. Storch's performance in carrying out the responsibilities of the two positions. In Fiscal 2014, the Board concluded that Mr. Storch's excellent performance as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company continued to serve the best interests of the Company's stockholders.


Risk Management Oversight

The Board of Directors, directly and through its committees, is responsible for overseeing management's process for assessing and managing the Company's exposure to risks. In that role, the Board regularly reviews and responds to management's business strategies and initiatives, the Company's quarterly and annual financial results, and information relating to the Company's competitive position, customer base, and capital and liquidity position. The Board holds an annual strategy session with senior management devoted entirely to a review and consideration of the Company's businesses, markets, customers, competitors, and strategic initiatives and direction. This meeting includes an assessment of the key challenges and risks of the Company's businesses, and the opportunities for addressing and responding to these challenges and risks.

The Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board, oversees the enterprise risk management committee, which is composed of Company employees and is responsible for identifying the principal risks to the Company, developing and implementing risk mitigation strategies, auditing the effectiveness of the risk mitigation strategies and reporting to the Audit Committee. The enterprise risk management committee meets regularly with the Audit Committee to review and discuss the Company's principal risks and outline its risk mitigation approach for addressing these risks. The Audit Committee reports to the Board on risks relating to accounting, financial reporting and legal compliance, risks identified by the Company's internal and external auditors, and matters raised through the Company's Ethics Hotline. The Compensation Committee oversees and reports to the Board on the Company's incentive compensation programs to provide that they are appropriately structured to incentivize officers and key employees while assuring appropriate risk. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees and reports to the Board on corporate governance risks, including director independence and related party transactions.

The Board and its committees receive information from and have regular access to the individual members of management responsible for managing risk, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Group Vice Presidents, Controller, General Counsel and Internal Auditor. The directors meet each quarter with a broader group of the Company's employees at regularly scheduled Board dinners as an informal way of learning


Table of Contents

more about the Company's businesses and its employees. The Board also schedules at least one meeting per year at a Company facility other than the corporate headquarters to promote interaction with local management and employees and allow directors a first-hand opportunity to inspect the Company's business operations.


Executive Sessions

Independent directors of the Board meet in executive session without management as part of each regular Board meeting and otherwise when circumstances make it advisable or necessary. The Chairman of the Nominating and Governance CommitteeLead Director presides at the executive sessions of independent directors.


Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board, the Chairman of the Board, the Lead Director, independent directors as a group, or any individual director or Committee Chairman by mail addressed to:

    AAR CORP.
    Attention: Independent Directors, Lead Director or the name of the individual director
    c/o Corporate Secretary
    One AAR Place
    1100 North Wood Dale Road
    Wood Dale, Illinois 60191

The independent members of the Board of Directors have approved procedures for the processing, review and disposition of all communications sent by stockholders or other interested parties to the Board of Directors.


Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to codify long-standing policies and procedures and to demonstrate its commitment to corporate governance best practices. These Guidelines, under the administration of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, address director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, management evaluation and succession, and the annual performance evaluation of the Board of Directors. These Guidelines are reviewed and approved annually by the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors, most recently in July 2014.


Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

The Company's Code of Business Ethics and Conduct adopted by the Board of Directors applies to all directors, officers, and employees, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the President and Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. The purpose of the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct is to promote the highest ethical standards in the Company's business practices and procedures, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest; full, fair and timely disclosure; and compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations. Employees are encouraged to report to the Company any conduct that they believe in good faith to be in violation of the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct. We will post any amendments to the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct and any waivers from the Code granted by the Board to directors or executive officers on the Company's website, as required under SEC rules.

The Board reviewed and revised the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct in Fiscal 2011. The revisions strengthened the rules relating to the offering and receipt of gifts and updated the Code's provisions regarding the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Federal Government Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct.


Table of Contents


Related Person Transaction Policy

The purpose of the Related Person Transaction Policy, as adopted by the Board of Directors, is to provide for the identification, review, and consideration of transactions between the Company or its subsidiaries and any related persons. "Related persons" means: the Company's directors; director nominees; executive officers; greater than five percent beneficial owners of the Company's voting securities; members of their immediate families; and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner, a principal, or in a similar position, or in which such person has a 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest.

Under the Policy, any related person transaction involving amounts in excess of $120,000 must be reviewed, considered, and approved by the Board of Directors directly or through the Nominating and Governance Committee. Review of a proposed related person transaction takes into consideration the purpose of, and the potential benefits to the Company from, the related person transaction, and the impact of the related person transaction on a director's independence in the event that the related person is a director or an immediate family member of a director. No member of the Board or the Nominating and Governance Committee may participate in any review, consideration, or approval of any related person transaction with respect to which such member or any of his or her immediate family members is the related person.

The Policy provides that the Company may undertake certain pre-approved related person transactions without further specific review, consideration, and approval, including the following:

    Transactions(e.g., transactions in which the related person's interest derives solely from his or her service as a director of another corporation or entity that is a party to the transaction;

    Transactions in which the related person's interest derives solely from his or her ownership (together with that of any other related persons) of less than 10% of the equity interest in another person (other than a general partnership interest) that is a party to the transaction;

    Transactions in which the related person's interest derives solely from his or her ownership of a class of equity securities of the Companytransaction) without further specific review, consideration and all holders of that class of equity securities receive the same benefits on a pro rata basis;

    Transactions involving the purchase or sale of products in the ordinary course of business, not exceeding $120,000 on an annual basis; and

    Compensation paid to executive officers and directors of the Company that is reported in the Company's proxy statement or otherwise approved by the Compensation Committee.
approval.

The Board approvedCompany has a "Founder's Agreement" dated October 19, 2010 between the Company andFounder's Agreement with Ira A. Eichner, the Founder and a former director and Chairman of the Board of the Company. The Founder's Agreement recognizes Mr. Eichner's extraordinary contributions to the Company for over 5556 years and the value to the Company of an ongoing relationship with Mr. Eichner. Under the Founder's Agreement, upon request of the Company and subject to his availability, Mr. Eichner will serve as an ambassador for the Company and provide consulting services on operational and strategic issues.Agreement. Mr. Eichner receives a quarterly retainer of $25,000 and is reimbursed for business expenses incurred in service to the Company.$25,000. Mr. Eichner also participates in the Company's Non-Employee Directors' Retirement Plan until December 1, 2015 (see "—Director Compensation Table," footnote 5)Compensation"). Mr. Eichner is Mr. Storch's father-in-law.


Table of Contents


Board Committees

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee, and an Executive Committee. The following table showsidentifies the current membershipmembers of each committee:

 
 
 Director
  
 Audit
Committee

  
 Compensation
Committee

  
 Nominating and
Governance
Committee

  
 Executive
Committee

  

 

 

Anthony K. Anderson

XX

Norman R. Bobins

   X   X          

 

 

Michael R. Boyce

       X   X      

 

 

James G. Brocksmith, Jr.

XX

Ronald R. Fogleman

       X   Chair   X  

 

 

James E. Goodwin

   Chair       X   X  

 

 

Patrick J. Kelly

   X       X      

 

 

Peter Pace

       X   X

Timothy J. Romenesko

      

 

 

David P. Storch

               Chair  

 

 

Marc J. Walfish

   X       X   X  

 

 

Ronald B. Woodard

   X   Chair          

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors qualified to serve on the Audit Committee under applicable SEC and NYSE rules and the Company's Categorical Standards and Policy for Determining Director Independence. Its members are James E. Goodwin (Chairman)(Chair), Anthony K. Anderson, Norman R. Bobins, James G. Brocksmith, Jr., Patrick J. Kelly, Marc J. Walfish and Ronald B. Woodard. The Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of applicable SEC rules.

The Audit Committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter was last reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors at their July 20112014 meetings. The full text of the Audit Committee charter appears on the Company's website and is available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the Company's address listed on the first page of this proxy statement.

The Audit Committee is primarily concerned with the integrity of the Company's financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the performance of the Company's internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee performs the specific functions described in its charter, including:

    Approves and engages the independent registered public accounting firm that audits the Company's consolidated financial statements;


Table of Contents

    Pre-approves all non-audit and audit-related services furnished by the independent registered public accounting firm;

Table of Contents

    Maintains communication between the Board and the independent registered public accounting firm;

    Monitors the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;

    Oversees and reviews the Company's financial reporting processes and practices;

    Oversees and reviews the quality and adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls and the organization and performance of the Company's internal audit department;

    Reviews the scope and results of audits;

    Oversees the Company's enterprise risk management committee; and

    Meets with the independent registered public accounting firm representatives and internal audit department representatives without members of management present.

The Audit Committee held seven meetings during Fiscal 2011.2014. The Audit Committee Report for Fiscal 20112014 appears on page 18.pages 13-14.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors as defined under applicable SEC and NYSE rules and the Company's Categorical Standards and Policy for Determining Director Independence. Its members are Ronald B. Woodard (Chairman)(Chair), Anthony K. Anderson, Norman R. Bobins, Michael R. Boyce, James G. Brocksmith, Jr., Ronald R. Fogleman and Peter Pace.

The Compensation Committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter was last reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors at their July 20112014 meetings. The full text of the Compensation Committee charter appears on the Company's website and is available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the Company's address listed on the first page of this proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee is primarily concerned with establishing, reviewing and approving Chief Executive Officer compensation, reviewing and approving other senior executive compensation and overseeing the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit PlanCompany's stock plans and any other compensation and employee benefit plans. The Compensation Committee performs the specific functions described in its charter, including:

    Reviews and approves compensation policies and practices for all elected corporate officers, including named executive officers;

    Sets the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and, together with the full Board, evaluates the Chief Executive Officer's performance;

    Administers the Company's annual cash incentive and long-term stock incentive programs for officers, the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan, the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan and the AAR CORP. Section 162(m) Annual Cash Incentive Goal Program;Plan;

    Recommends director compensation and benefits to the Board for approval; and

Table of Contents

    Recommends director compensation and benefits to the Board for approval; and

    Oversees administration of certain other employee benefit, director deferred compensation, savings and retirement plans.

The Compensation Committee held sixfive meetings during Fiscal 2011.2014. The Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation for Fiscal 20112014 appears on page 51. Information about the role of the Compensation Committee consultant and management in the executive compensation process is set forth under "Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section on pages 46-47.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors as defined under applicable SEC and NYSE rules and the Company's Categorical Standards and Policy for Determining Director Independence. Its members are Ronald R. Fogleman (Chairman)(Chair), Michael R. Boyce, James E. Goodwin, Patrick J. Kelly, Peter Pace and Marc J. Walfish.

The Nominating and Governance Committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter was last reviewed and approved by the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors at their July 20112014 meetings. The full text of the Nominating and Governance Committee charter appears on the Company's website and is available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the Company's address listed on the first page of this proxy statement.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for both nominating and governance matters as described in its charter. The Nominating and Governance Committee performs the specific functions described in its charter, including:

    Oversees the composition, structure and evaluation of the Board and its committees;

    Reviews, considers, and acts upon related person transactions;

    Develops and recommends Corporate Governance Guidelines for Board approval; and

    Monitors and screens directors for independence and recommends to the Board qualified candidates for election as directors and to serve on Board committees.

The Nominating and Governance Committee held fivethree meetings during Fiscal 2011.2014.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee is comprised of David P. Storch (Chairman)(Chair), James E. Goodwin, Ronald R. Fogleman and Marc J. Walfish. Mr.Messrs. Goodwin, Fogleman and Mr. Walfish are each independent directors as defined by applicable SEC and NYSE rulesrules. As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company's Categorical StandardsCompany, Mr. Storch does not qualify as an independent director under the NYSE and Policy for Determining Director Independence.SEC rules.

The Executive Committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter was last reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors at theirits July 2011 meetings.2014 meeting. The full text of the Executive Committee charter appears on the Company's website and is available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the Company's address listed on the first page of this proxy statement.

The Executive Committee is authorized to meet between meetings of the Board of Directors and exercise certain powers of the Board with respect to urgent matters or other matters referred to


Table of Contents

it by the Board for deliberation or action, subject to limitations imposed by the Committee's charter, the Board, applicable law and the Company's By-Laws.


Table of Contents

The Executive Committee did not meet during Fiscal 2011.2014.


Board Meetings and Attendance

During Fiscal 2011,2014, the Board held fourfive meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on two occasions. All persons who were directors during Fiscal 2011 attended at least 75% of the Board meetings and meetings of Board committees on which they served.served in Fiscal 2014.

The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors are expected to attend all stockholder meetings. All the members of the Company's Board of Directors attended the Company's 20112013 annual meeting of stockholders.


Director Compensation

The Board believes that compensation for any director who is not an officer or employee of the Company or any subsidiary ("Non-Employee Director") should be a mix of cash and equity compensation. Director compensation and benefits are recommended to the Board of Directors from time to time by the Compensation Committee for Board approval. Directors who are officers or employees of the Company or any subsidiary receive no additional compensation for service on the Board or any of its committees.

In Fiscal 2011,The Board of Directors reviews director compensation annually to ensure that it is fair, appropriate and in line with its peer group companies. At its January 2013 meeting, the Compensation Committee, withBoard reviewed the assistancefindings of a report by its independent compensation consultant reviewedanalyzing director compensation information of the Company and its peer group companies. This report showed that the Company's existingcash compensation for directors was above the median of the Company's peer group, the Company's equity compensation was below the median and total compensation was slightly below the median of the peer group (see pages 35-37 for information relating to the Company's peer group). Based on this information, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, made no changes to its Fiscal 2014 director compensation program. Based on the review and subsequent discussions involving the full Board, senior management and representatives of the independent compensation consultant, the Board approved a new director compensation program effective June 1, 2011, designed to provide competitive compensation that fairly rewards directors for their service to the Company.

The following table identifies the elements of director compensation in effect during Fiscal 2011 and the new director compensation program that became effective June 1, 2011:2014:

 
 
 Compensation Element
  
 Fiscal 2011 Non-Employee Director
Compensation Program

  
 New Non-Employee Director
Compensation Program

  

 

 Annual Retainer   $45,000   $50,000  

 

 

Annual Committee Chair Retainer

   $5,000   $10,000  

 

 

Board and Committee Meeting Fees

   $2,500
($1,250 for telephone meetings)
   Same  

 

 

Annual Equity Grant

   4,000 shares of Common Stock
(vesting over three years)
   5,000 shares of Common Stock
(vesting over one year)
  


Compensation Element

Fiscal 2014 Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

Annual Retainer

$50,000

Lead Director Annual Retainer

$30,000

Committee Chair Annual Retainer

$10,000

Board and Committee Meeting Fees

$2,500 per meeting
($1,250 for telephone meetings)

Annual Stock Award

5,000 shares of common stock
(vesting after one year)

Annual retainer feesAll retainers are paid quarterly, Committee Chairman retainer fees are paid annually, and meeting fees are paid promptly following each meeting attended. The annual equity grant is typically madestock award was approved at the Board's July meeting, but in Fiscal 2011 it was made at the AprilJanuary 2014 meeting with an effective date of June 1, 2011.2014. Each Non-Employee Directornon-employee director may elect to defer receipt of the retainers and meeting fees pursuant to the Company's Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Director Plan"). Under the Director Plan, deferred retainer fees are converted into stock units equivalent to shares of Common Stock,common stock, and deferred meeting fees are


Table of Contents

credited with interest quarterly based on the 10-Year United States Treasury Bond rate. Distributions of deferred retainer fees under the Director Plan are madepaid in cash or in shares of common stock of equivalent value, Common Stock, at the participant's election, and distribution of deferred meeting fees are made in cash, in each case upon termination of service on the Board or on the happening of certain other events, as specified in the Director Plan.

Each Non-Employee Director,non-employee director, upon being elected a director, receives term life insurance coverage of $200,000 and is eligible (with spouse) to participate in a Company-paid, annual physical program. The Company also reimburses its directors for travel, lodging and related expenses they incur in attending Board and committee meetings.


Director Compensation Table

General.The following table details the totalsets forth all compensation paid to the Company's Non-Employee Directorseach non-employee director for Fiscal 2011:2014:

 
 
 Name1
  
 Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash ($)2

  
 Stock
Awards ($)3

  
 Option
Awards ($)4

  
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)

  
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)5

  
 All Other
Compensation
($)6

  
 Total ($)
  

 

 Norman R. Bobins    73,750    71,640    0    0    0    3,220    148,610  

 

 

Michael R. Boyce

    78,750    71,640    0    0    0    720    151,110  

 

 

James G. Brocksmith, Jr.

    86,250    71,640    0    0    76,428    7,336    241,654  

 

 

Gerald F. Fitzgerald, Jr.
(retired October 2010)

    25,625    71,640    0    0    0        97,265  

 

 

Ronald R. Fogleman

    78,750    71,640    0    0    0    2,142    152,532  

 

 

James E. Goodwin

    85,000    71,640    0    0    0    12,220    168,860  

 

 

Patrick J. Kelly

    72,500    71,640    0    0    0    720    144,860  

 

 

Peter Pace
(elected January 2011)

    31,375    55,600    0    0    0    720    87,695  

 

 

Marc J. Walfish

    80,000    71,640    0    0    0    720    152,360  

 

 

Ronald B. Woodard

    82,500    71,640    0    0    0    720    154,860  
 
 
 Name1
  
 Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash ($)2

  
 Stock
Awards
($)3

  
 Option
Awards
($)4

  
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)

  
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)

  
 All Other
Compensation
($)5

  
 Total ($)
  

 

 

Anthony K. Anderson

    86,250    103,400    0    0    0   $747    190,397  

 

 

Norman R. Bobins

    86,250    103,400    0    0    0    747    190,397  

 

 

Michael R. Boyce

    72,500    103,400    0    0    0    2,238    178,138  

 

 

Ronald R. Fogleman

    120,000    103,400    0    0    0    2,429    225,829  

 

 

James E. Goodwin

    92,500    103,400    0    0    0    7,247    203,147  

 

 

Patrick J. Kelly

    82,500    103,400    0    0    0    747    186,647  

 

 

Peter Pace

    78,750    103,400    0    0    0    4,596    186,746  

 

 

Marc J. Walfish

    80,000    103,400    0    0    0    2,331    185,731  

 

 

Ronald B. Woodard

    96,250    103,400    0    0    0    747    200,397  
1
Mr. Storch and Mr. Romenesko are not included in this table, because as they are employee directors of the Company, andthey receive no additional compensation for their service as directors. Their compensation from the Company is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement.


Table of Contents

2
The following table provides a breakdown of director fees earned or paid in cash for Fiscal 2011 (the amounts for Mr. Fitzgerald and General Pace reflect their service for less than the full year):2014:

 
 
 Name
  
 Annual
Retainer ($)

  
 Committee Chair
Retainer Fees ($)

  
 Meeting Fees ($)
  
 Total ($)
  

 

 Norman R. Bobins    45,000    0    28,750    73,750  

 

 

Michael R. Boyce

    45,000    0    33,750    78,750  

 

 

James G. Brocksmith, Jr.

    45,000    5,000    36,250    86,250  

 

 

Gerald F. Fitzgerald, Jr.

    16,875    0    8,750    25,625  

 

 

Ronald R. Fogleman

    45,000    5,000    28,750    78,750  

 

 

James E. Goodwin

    45,000    5,000    35,000    85,000  

 

 

Patrick J. Kelly

    45,000    0    27,500    72,500  

 

 

Peter Pace

    16,375    0    15,000    31,375  

 

 

Marc J. Walfish

    45,000    0    35,000    80,000  

 

 

Ronald B. Woodard

    45,000    0    37,500    82,500  
 
  
  
 
 Name
  
 Annual
Retainer ($)

  
 Committee Chair
Retainer Fees ($)

  
 Meeting Fees ($)
  
 Lead Director Fee
  
 Total ($)
  

 

 

Anthony K. Anderson

    50,000        36,250        86,250  

 

 

Norman R. Bobins

    50,000        36,250        86,250  

 

 

Michael R. Boyce

    50,000        22,500        72,500  

 

 

Ronald R. Fogleman

    50,000    10,000    30,000    30,000    120,000  

 

 

James E. Goodwin

    50,000    10,000    32,500        92,500  

 

 

Patrick J. Kelly

    50,000        32,500        82,500  

 

 

Peter Pace

    50,000        28,750        78,750  

 

 

Marc J. Walfish

    50,000        30,000        80,000  

 

 

Ronald B. Woodard

    50,000    10,000    36,250        96,250  

Table of Contents

3
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the Fiscal 2011 restricted2014 stock awards granted to each Non-Employee Directornon-employee director computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. All of Mr. Fitzgerald's unvested restricted shares, including those granted in Fiscal 2011, were cancelled in connection with his termination of service from the Board. As of May 31, 2011,2014, each Non-Employee Director (other than General Pace)non-employee director held 7,5015,000 unvested restricted shares. On June 2, 2014, each non-employee director received a grant of 5,000 shares and General Pace held 2,000 unvested restricted shares.that will vest on June 2, 2015.

4
No stock options were granted to Non-Employee Directorsnon-employee directors in Fiscal 2011.2014. The aggregate number of shares issuable pursuant to stock options held by each Non-Employee Directornon-employee director as of May 31, 20112014 was as follows: Mr. Anderson, 0; Mr. Bobins, 0; Mr. Boyce, 0; Mr. Brocksmith, 7,000; General Fogleman, 7,000;3,500; Mr. Goodwin, 7,000;3,500; Mr. Kelly, 0; General Pace, 0; Mr. Walfish, 17,000;3,500; and Mr. Woodard, 3,500.0.

5
Mr. Brocksmith is the only current director eligible to receive benefits under the Company's Non-Employee Directors' Retirement Plan upon retirement from the Board. Effective April 10, 2001, the Company terminated this Plan, which provides for quarterly cash payments following retirement in an amount equal to 25% of the annual retainer for a period equal to the total number of years of service as a director, up to a maximum of 10 years, or until death. The amount in this column represents the increase in the present value of accumulated benefits under this Plan during Fiscal 2011, determined using assumptions consistent with those used for reporting purposes in the Company's 2011 Form 10-K. There were no preferential or above-market earnings credited under the Company's Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan.

6
This column includes reimbursed expenses in connection with spousal travel and/or travel and hotel expense in connection with the Company-paid director/spouse annual physical program as well as the cost of the annual physical program and the cost of term life insurance.

Fiscal 2015 Director Compensation.    At its April 2014 meeting, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and following a presentation by its independent compensation consultant on director compensation trends and best practices, approved the same director compensation program in Fiscal 2015 that was in effect in Fiscal 2014.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Messrs. Anderson, Bobins, Boyce, Brocksmith,and Woodard, General Fogleman Woodard and General Pace, all of whom are independent Non-Employee Directors,non-employee directors, are the current members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. During Fiscal 2011,2014, none of the executive officers of the Company served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity whose officers served either on the Board of Directors of the Company or on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.


Table of Contents



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The purpose of theThis Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") is to describedescribes our Fiscal 2014 executive compensation program. In this section, we provide the followingIt provides information about the goals and the key elements of the program and explains the reasons behind the Compensation Committee's executive compensation decisions.

Our focus in this CD&A is the Fiscal 2014 compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the other three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (ourfollowing "named executive officers"):

    An "Executive Summary" identifying of the primary goals of our executive compensation program and describing our Fiscal 2011 business performance and executive compensation;

    The principal compensation elements of our executive compensation program;

    Our Fiscal 2011 executive compensation decisions, focusing on the relationship between business performance and executive compensation; and

    Our key executive compensation policies and practices.
Company:



Name

Title

David P. StorchChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Timothy J. RomeneskoPresident and Chief Operating Officer
John C. FortsonVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since July 25, 2013
Randy J. MartinezGroup Vice President — Airlift
Robert J. ReganVice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Michael J. SharpActing Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer through July 25, 2013 and Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

I. Executive Summary

    A.

    Goals of Our Executive Compensation Program

The primary goals of our executive compensation program are to:

    Attract and retain talented executives capable of producing outstanding business results for the Company;

    Motivate and reward executives by paying for performance in a manner that takes into account Company, business group and individual performance; and

    Provide for compensation that strikes a proper balance between short-term and long-term compensation, and between cash and equitystock compensation, with an emphasis on equitystock compensation to align the interests of executives with the interests of the Company's stockholders.

B.

Fiscal 20112014 Business Performance Highlights

The CompanyAAR CORP. (the "Company") is a leading provider of diversified products and services to the worldwide aviation and government and defense markets. We delivered exceptional business performancesolid financial results for Fiscal 2014 despite reductions in Fiscal 2011. We achieved record consolidated salesdemand from our government and defense customers owing principally to the drawdown of $1.78 billion (a 34.9% increase over Fiscal 2010) and earned net income of $69.8 million (a 56.5% increase over Fiscal 2010) and diluted earnings per share of $1.73 (a 49.1% increase over Fiscal 2010). Our businesses generated $108.6 millionthe U.S. military presence in cash flow from operations during Fiscal 2011, most of which was reinvested to strengthen and broaden our product and service capabilities for the future. We also began paying an annual dividend of $.30 per share in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011.Afghanistan.


Table of Contents

The table below summarizes

Our continued focus on our key businesscore businesses — aviation services and technology products — together with ongoing efforts to manage costs and strengthen our balance sheet, contributed to the following performance resultshighlights in Fiscal 20112014:

    We reported record diluted earnings per share of $1.83, compared to Fiscal 2010 (dollars in thousands, except$1.38 per share data):

     
      
      
     Fiscal 2011 ($)
      
     Fiscal 2010 ($)
      
     Change (%)
      

     

     Sales    1,775,782    1,316,416    34.9  

     

     

    Operating Income

        138,727    93,769    47.9  

     

     

    Net Income

        69,826    44,628    56.5  

     

     

    Diluted Earnings Per Share

        1.73    1.16    49.1  

     

     

    Stockholders' Equity

        835,845    746,906    11.9  
    in Fiscal 2013;


    We generated strong cash flow in Fiscal 2014, producing almost $140 million in cash flow from operations and $113 million in free cash flow, which allowed us to reduce our net debt by $89 million, pay dividends totaling $11.8 million to our stockholders and invest further in our businesses to ensure future growth;

    We expanded our product/service portfolio and strengthened our strategic capabilities in Fiscal 2014 with the opening of a new airframe service center in Lake Charles, Louisiana, the acquisition of a niche commercial cargo loading systems business in Germany and the addition of a new supply chain hub in Brussels, Belgium;

    Our stock price increased 21% in Fiscal 2014 to $24.30 per share from $20.06 per share, and 66% in Fiscal 2013 to $20.06 per share from $12.05 per share (our stock price on August 22, 2014 was $27.23 per share); and

    We received several industry awards in recognition of our performance ("Best Airframe MRO Provider in the Americas," "Outstanding Component Repair Provider" and "Boeing Gold Performance Excellence Award"), and we were once again named as one of Forbes magazine's "100 Most Trustworthy Companies" in 2014.

For more information about our business,financial and operating performance in Fiscal 2014, please see "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 13, 2011.17, 2014. For more information about our stock price performance, please see "Comparison of Cumulative Five-Year Total Return" in our Form 10-K.

    C.

    Fiscal 20112014 Executive Compensation Highlights

    Stockholder Outreach Program

The compensation awarded to the Company's named executive officersWe conducted a formal stockholder outreach program in Fiscal 2011 reflected2014 following the say-on-pay vote at our 2013 annual meeting. The purpose of the program was to gain a better understanding of concerns related to our executive compensation program and other matters of stockholder interest. Under the program, which was supplemental to our regular ongoing communications with stockholders, we reached out to stockholders owning approximately 75% of our outstanding shares. Participants in the Compensation Committee's view, contributedoutreach effort included at various times our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. We also received feedback from two proxy advisory firms, Institutional Stockholder Services ("ISS") and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. ("Glass Lewis").

Based on the information gained from our stockholder outreach program, we made significant substantive changes to the Company's exceptional business performance for the year. Fiscal 2011our executive compensation also underlined the Company's commitment to pay for performance.

Below is a summary of the Fiscal 2011 compensation paid to the named executive officers of the Company:

    Base salaries for the named executive officers increased marginally in Fiscal 2011 compared to Fiscal 2010policies and practices. We believe that, as a result of a Company-wide 2% merit pool increase in the base salaries for all employees (except that the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Storch's base salary by 6% per the terms of his employment agreement,these changes, our executive compensation program is better designed to enhance stockholder value and Mr. Romenesko received a 3% increase).

    Annual cash incentives for the namedattract and retain executive officers paid out just below the maximum level in Fiscal 2011 based ontalent pivotal to the Company's net income and leverage ratio performance for the June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011 performance period. The Company significantly exceeded the performance targets established by the Compensation Committee in July 2010. The result was an annual cash incentive ranging from 120% to 165% of base salary for the named executive officers.

    Long-term incentive compensation — consisting of performance-based restricted stock, stock options and time-based restricted stock — was significantly lower for the named executive officers in Fiscal 2011 due to the re-design of the Company's long-term incentive plan. The Fiscal 2011 long-term incentive plan provided for a single grant of performance-based restricted stock with a single, three-year performance period. In contrast, in Fiscal 2010 there were two grants of performance-based restricted stock: one grant for the Fiscal 2010 performance period and a second grant for the combined Fiscal 2009 and Fiscal 2010 performance period.
success.

Principally as a result of the difference between the value of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010 performance-based restricted stock, total direct compensation (defined as base salary plus


Table of Contents


annual cash incentive plus long-term incentive compensation)decreased for each named executive officer (other than Mr. Regan who was not a named executive officer in Fiscal 2010) in Fiscal 2011 versus Fiscal 2010, as shown in

Here are the table below:

 
  
  
 
  
  
 Total Direct Compensation
(Base Salary + Annual Cash Incentive + Grant Date
Value of Long-Term Incentive Compensation)

  
 
 Named Executive Officer
  
 Fiscal 2011($)
  
 Fiscal 2010 ($)
  
 Change
  

 

 David P. Storch   $4,614,913   $5,737,452    -19.6%  

 

 

Timothy J. Romenesko

   $2,311,827   $2,842,332    -18.7%  

 

 

Richard J. Poulton

   $1,488,173   $1,669,742    -10.9%  

 

 

Terry D. Stinson

   $1,053,933   $1,491,437    -29.3%  

 

 

Robert J. Regan

   $1,488,173    N/A    N/A  

In addition, "Total" compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52decreased for fourhighlights of the named executive officers in Fiscal 2011, as comparedsubstantive changes made to Fiscal 2010.

In support of the Company's emphasis on pay-for-performance compensation and to align the Company'sour executive compensation program more closely to market practice, the Compensation Committee made the following decisions in Fiscal 2011 with respect to the Company's executive compensation program:2014:

    Retained the UseNew Employment Agreement with Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  Our new three-year employment agreement with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer David P. Storch eliminates all tax gross-up provisions, no longer provides a window of Two Performance Goals under the Short-Term Incentive Plan.  The Company believes that income statement and balance sheet strength are critical to the Company's financial success and its ability to competeopportunity in the marketplace. Accordingly,25th month after a change in control to terminate employment for any reason and still receive severance, and imposes a "double trigger" on the Company decided to retain two separate performance goalsvesting of stock awards upon a change in the designcontrol ("double trigger" meaning a change of its short-term incentive plan: net income, as a measure of income statement performance,control and a leverage ratio, as a measuretermination of balance sheet performance. Each performance goal is given equal weight (50%) in the determination of an executive's annual cash bonus. In addition,employment). The agreement also provides that the Compensation Committee established threshold, targetwill determine all short-term and maximum performance goals designed to provide proper incentives to the Company's executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes thislong-term incentive structure aligns the interests of the executives and the Company in a way that ultimately benefits the Company's stockholders.awards for Mr. Storch.

    Re-DesignedChanges to Our Short-Term Incentive Plan.  For Fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee, at management's recommendation, exercised negative discretion to reduce by 30% the performance-based cash bonuses paid to the five named executive officers whose bonuses under the short-term incentive plan were based on Company-wide performance. In the case of Mr. Storch, for example, his actual Fiscal 2014 cash bonus of $851,548 was 30% less than the bonus of $1,216,498 determined by formula under the plan. The other four named executive officers also received cash bonuses that were 30% lower than their bonuses determined by formula under the plan. For Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015, the Company changed its performance goals to earnings per share and cash flow from operations (in place of free cash flow) and adopted a rigorous set of threshold, target and maximum measures designed to provide payouts that are commensurate with performance against the Company's peer group companies.

    Changes to Our Long-Term Incentive Plan.  The Company made several changesFor Fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee continued to its long-term incentive plan in Fiscal 2011. It retained the useimpose significant time-vesting conditions on stock awards as a means of encouraging performance and promoting retention: performance-based restricted stock vests 331/3% each in years three, four and addedfive after grant; time-based restricted stocks vests 50% each in years four and five after grant; and stock options vest ratably over a stock option component tofive-year period. In addition, for Fiscal 2015, the long-term incentive plan. The additionCompensation Committee granted significantly fewer shares consistent with the Company's burn rate commitment under the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan (see below). It also altered the mix of stock options emphasizedawards to place greater emphasis on performance-based restricted stock. The Compensation Committee added return on invested capital, together with a three-year cumulative net income measure, as the significance ofperformance goals for performance-based restricted stock price appreciation: an executive does not realize any value from the award unless the Company's stock price increases over the exercise price of the stock option. To round out theunder our Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan and promote executive retention,adopted a rigorous set of threshold, target and maximum measures designed to provide payouts that are commensurate with performance against the Company also providedCompany's peer group companies.

    Our 2013 Stock Plan.  Our 2013 stock plan has a limited number of shares (2.5 million) consistent with the Company's commitment to maintain an average annual burn rate over the next three fiscal years not to exceed 3.7%. Our 2013 stock plan does not allow for the recycling of shares (i.e., shares withheld to pay the option exercise price and taxes do not become available for use under the plan) and does not permit the repricing of time-based restricted stock. The Company believes thatstock options without stockholder approval. All award agreements under the use of three different types2013 stock plan provide for a "double trigger" on the vesting of stock awards incentivizes executives to achieve stock price appreciation, thereby aligning the executives' interests with the interests of stockholders, and promotes the long-term retention of executives. The Company also adjusted the design of its performance-basedupon a change in control.


Table of Contents


    Changes to Our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.  In Fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee, at management's recommendation, reduced by 50% the portion of the annual non-qualified deferred compensation contributions earned by formula in Fiscal 2014 by the following named executive officers under the Supplemental Key Employee Retirement Plan ("SKERP") as a cost-savings measure designed to make the Company's program more consistent with market practice. In particular, the reduction in Mr. Storch's contribution took account of the existing balance in his non-qualified deferred compensation account.

 
 
  
 Additional Supplemental Company Contribution
  
 
 Named Executive Officer
  
 Formula Amount
  
 Actual Amount
  

  

 

David P. Storch

   $495,115   $247,557  

  

 

Timothy J. Romenesko

   $187,513   $93,756  

  

 

Robert J. Regan

   $81,309   $40,655  

Two other named executive officers received the minimum contribution and the sixth named executive officer does not participate in the SKERP.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

    New Employment Agreement.  We entered into a new three-year employment agreement with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer David P. Storch. The agreement provides for the elimination of all tax gross-ups and Mr. Storch's ability to terminate employment for any reason during the 25th month after a change in control and still receive severance. The agreement imposes a "double trigger" on the vesting of stock awards upon a change in control. The agreement also provides that the Compensation Committee will determine all short-term and long-term incentive awards for Mr. Storch as a part of its regular annual compensation-setting process.

    Fiscal 2014 Compensation.  Mr. Storch received a 2% increase over his year-end base salary, a significantly reduced cash bonus (30% below the bonus determined by formula under the short-term incentive plan) and a 10% increase in the number of shares under his long-term incentive award, all as reflected in the table below (note that Fiscal 2013 actual base salary was the amount paid in Fiscal 2013, not the year-end base salary).

 
 
 
  
  
 Fiscal 2013 ($)
  
 Fiscal 2014 ($)
  
 
 Compensation Element
  
 Actual
  
 Target
  
 Per Formula
  
 Actual
  

  

 Base Salary    877,838    906,449    N/A    906,449  

  

 

Annual Cash Incentive

    1,350,685    1,133,061    1,216,498    851,548  

  

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

    1,314,720    2,964,720    N/A    2,964,720  
    CEO Compensation Mix in Fiscal 2014  Mr. Storch's Fiscal 2014 compensation was significantly weighted toward variable performance-based compensation. His performance-based restricted stock awards, using cumulative net income over a three-year period asaward, stock option award and performance-based cash bonus represented 66% of his total direct compensation in Fiscal 2014.


Table of Contents


Fiscal 2015 Executive Compensation Actions

Our Compensation Committee made significant changes to the applicableCompany's executive compensation program in Fiscal 2015 based on its consideration of the following factors: the macro-environment in which the Company operates its businesses; the Company's performance goal. The reason for this change was to emphasizein Fiscal 2014 and its expected performance in Fiscal 2015; the executive compensation assessment prepared by its independent compensation consultant in July 2014; the Company's commitment to long-term net income performance.meeting the burn rate parameters under the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan; stockholder concerns identified in our stockholder outreach program; and other relevant items. In sum, the Compensation Committee took the following Fiscal 2015 executive compensation actions:

    Adopted ProtectionFroze base salaries at their Fiscal 2014 levels;

    Retained earnings per share and cash flow from operations as the performance goals under the Fiscal 2015 short-term incentive plan;

    Granted a total of 288,206 shares to employees under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan (which equals 576,412 "equivalent shares" for purposes of the Recoveryburn rate calculation given that the shares granted were performance-based and time-based restricted stock), as contrasted with a total of Incentive Compensation ("Clawback").1,154,631 shares granted to employees under the Fiscal 2014 long-term incentive plan (which equals 1,276,247 "equivalent shares" for purposes of the burn rate calculation as the shares granted included performance-based and time-based restricted stock as well as stock options) — thus, a 75% reduction in total shares and a 55% reduction in "equivalent shares";  The Company revised its standard

    Consistent with the above, granted stock award agreementsawards with a dollar value of $1,695,200 to includeour Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in Fiscal 2015, compared to Fiscal 2014 stock awards of $2,964,720 — a Clawback provision that gives43% reduction in the Companydollar value of the rightstock awards;

    Altered the mix of stock awards under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan to recover all or a portionplace greater emphasis on performance-based restricted stock (75% of an equitytotal stock awards in Fiscal 2015 are performance-based restricted stock compared to 23% in Fiscal 2014); and

    Approved return on invested capital and cumulative net income as the two performance goals for performance-based restricted stock under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive award under certain circumstances. These circumstances relate principally to those instances in which an award was paid based upon the achievement of financial results that were subsequently restated and the restated financial results would have yielded a lower incentive award.plan.


II.

Table of Contents

I. Principal Compensation Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

The table below identifies the principal elements of our Fiscal 20112014 executive compensation program, withand the ensuingsubsequent narrative providingprovides a brieffuller description of each element.


 
 Compensation Element
  
 Form of Compensation
  
 Performance Criteria
  

  

 

Base salary

   Cash   Recognition of individual performance/Individual performance and contributions  

  

 

Annual cash compensation incentive

   Cash   •  Net incomeEarnings per share
•  Leverage ratioCash flow from operations
•  Specific business unit goals
  

  

 

Long-term incentivesstock incentive compensation

   •  Stock options   •  Stock price appreciationIndividual performance and contributions  

 

  

 

     •  RestrictedTime-based restricted stock   •  Recognition of individual performance/Individual performance and contributions  

 

  

 

     •  Performance-based restricted stock   •  Cumulative net income over three years (subject to stock price triggers)
•  Return on invested capital (implemented for Fiscal 2015)
  

 

 

Retirement benefits

   Eligibility to participate in and receive Company contributions to our 401(k) plan (available to all employees) and, for certain officers, a supplemental deferred compensation plan   Not applicable  

  

 

Perquisites

   Various (see below)   Not applicable  
    A.
    Base Salary

The Company provides base salaries as a guaranteed minimum amount of compensation in consideration of day-to-day performance. Base salaries are designed to reward individual performance and contributions consistent with an executive officer's position and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salaries of all executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers, and may adjust base salaries, typically at the beginning of a fiscal year, based upon consideration of:

    The executive's current salary;


Table of Contents

    The executive's performance and contributions during the past fiscal year;

    The executive's qualifications and responsibilities;

    The executive's tenure with the Company and the position held by the executive;

Table of Contents

    The Company-wide merit pool increase in the base salaries for all employees;

    Competitive salary considerations relative to similar positions at other companies competing for talent in the Company's employment market, including the Company's peer group companies; and

    The recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, in the case of all executive officers other than himself.

    B.
    Annual Cash IncentivesIncentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that annual incentive opportunities, payable in cash, serve as an appropriate incentive for achievement of the Company's short-term (i.e., one-year) performance goals at either the corporate level or at the business group level. A cash-based incentive provides an opportunity that is consistent with market practice and allows the named executive officers to receive the value of their performance over the measurement period.

Within the first 90 days of each fiscal year, the Company establishes specific performance goals for its executive officers, including the named executive officers, that govern the payment of annual cash incentive awards for that fiscal year. The Company pays an annual cash incentive awardbonus to each named executive officer, typically measured as a percentage of the executive officer's base salary, based on the extent to which the Company and the executive officer achieve applicable performance goals. Performance at a target level results in a target annual cash incentive award,bonus, and performance above or below target results in payment of an annual cash incentive awardbonus at a higher or lower percentage of base salary, respectively. Performance below a minimum threshold results in no annual cash incentive award.bonus. In all cases, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to not award any annual cash bonuses in a given year. For named executive officers at the corporate level, the annual cash incentivebonus in recent years has beenFiscal 2014 was based on two performance goals: net incomeearnings per share and a leverage ratio (average total recourse net debt to capital).cash flow from operations. For a named executive officerofficers in charge of a business group, the annual cash incentivebonus is typically based on the performance results of the business group, rather than the Company as a whole.

    C.
    Long-Term IncentivesStock Incentive Compensation

The Company uses equitystock compensation to provide long-term incentive opportunities for its named executive officers and certain other officers and key employees. The Company believes that the use of equitystock compensation rewards executives in a manner that aligns their interests with the interests of the Company's stockholders. Given the importance of this alignment, long-term equity-basedstock-based compensation typically represents the most significant component of total compensation for the Company's executive officers. Long-term stock incentive compensation grantsawards representpotential compensation at the time of grant; their value is realized by a named executive officer only if applicable performance and vesting conditions are satisfied.

Equity compensation is provided under the stockholder-approved AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan ("Stock Benefit Plan"). Under the Stock Benefit Plan, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to grant stock options, performance-based restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards, employment or time-based restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards, or any


Table of Contents


combination of the foregoing. The Stock Benefit Plan also provides for the use of stock appreciation units; however, to date, the Compensation Committee has not granted any stock appreciation units.

Generally, when determining restricted stock and stock option grant opportunities, the Compensation Committee considers the executive's position and responsibilities in the Company, performance and contributions during the preceding year, capabilities and potential for future contributions to the Company, the number of restricted stock shares and options previously granted to the executive and, for senior management (including the named executive officers), their stock ownership relative to the Company's stock ownership guidelines and the Chief Executive Officer's recommendation. The particular mix of stock awards — whether performance-based restricted shares, time-based restricted shares or stock options — depends on


Table of Contents

various factors considered by the Compensation Committee, including the number of shares available for award, the Company's performance priorities and the participants involved. In addition, the value of stock grants in any year will vary depending on the Board's assessment of the Company's business and share price performance in the prior fiscal year.

    D.
    Retirement Benefits

The Company's named executive officers participate in three retirement plans: the Retirement Plan, the Retirement Savings Plan and the Supplemental Key Employee Retirement Plan (the "SKERP").

    Retirement Plan.  Benefit accruals under the tax-qualified Retirement Plan ceased on June 1, 2005 for most employees, including Messrs. Storch, Romenesko and Romenesko,Sharp are the only named executive officers who participate in the tax-qualified Retirement Plan. Benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan ceased on June 1, 2005. At termination of employment, a participant is eligible to receive the amount credited to his account under the Retirement Plan, which consists of (i) an opening balance for those participants who participated in the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 1999 equal to the then present value of the benefit accrued as of such date, (ii) quarterly pay credits (through May 31, 2005) based on the participant's age and service, and (iii) quarterly interest credits until the account is distributed based on the 30-year Treasury securities rate.

    Retirement Savings Plan.  The Retirement Savings Plan is a tax-qualified 401(k) plan that covers most of the Company's U.S. employees.employees, including the named executive officers. An employee can elect to defer up to 75% of his compensation, up to a maximum of $16,500$17,500 in 2011,2014, or $22,000$23,000 if age 50 or over. Contributions can be made on a pre-tax or after-tax basis, as elected by the participant. The Company provides a matching contribution equal to 20% of the first 5% of the participant's contributions, up to 1% of compensation; a profit-sharing contribution of up to 4% of compensation based on the participant's deferrals and the performance of the participant's operating unit; and a retirement benefit contribution of up to 4% of compensation based on the participant's age and service.

    SKERP.  The Supplemental Key Executive Employee Retirement Plan (the "SKERP")SKERP is a non-qualified retirement plan that contains a defined benefit portion and a defined contribution portion. Benefit accruals under the defined benefit portion for all employees other than Messrs. Storch and Romenesko ceased as of October 1, 2001 and were distributed to the participants. The benefits accrued under the defined benefit portion as of May 31, 2006 for Messrs. Storch and Romenesko were converted to a lump sum and transferred to the defined contribution portion of the SKERP. The defined contribution portion of the SKERP is intended to provide eligible employees with the portion of their elective deferrals and the Company's matching and profit sharing contributions that could not be made under the Retirement Savings Plan due to Internal Revenue Code limitations on the amount of compensation that can be taken into account in determining contributions ($245,000255,000 in 20102013 and $260,000 in 2011)2014). The Company also makes annual

Table of Contents

      supplemental contributions equalof up to 22% of salary and bonus for Mr. Storch, up to 16% of salary and bonus for Mr. Romenesko, and up to 5% or 10% of salary and bonus for the other eligible named executive officers, principally to motivate these individuals to grow as business leaders and to improve their performance and thereby improve the Company's performance. These annual supplemental contributions do not vest until the named executive officers meet the definition of "retirement" under the SKERP. In Fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee, at


    Table of Contents

        management's recommendation, reduced by 50% the annual supplemental contributions earned by formula by three named executive officers, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer.

      E.
      Perquisites

    The Company provides certain executive officers, including its named executive officers, with a limited number of perquisites, as identified in the footnote to the "Other Compensation" column of the Summary Compensation Table. The Company believes these perquisites are reasonable, competitive and consistent with the Company's overall executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews on an annual basis the types and costs of perquisites provided by the Company to its executive officers.

    III.  OurII.  Fiscal 20112014 Executive Compensation Decisions

    The Board undertook a fresh look at the design of its executive compensation program in Fiscal 2011. Under the direction ofEach year management and the Compensation Committee and with the assistance of Aon Hewitt (formerly Hewitt Associates LLC), its independent compensation consultant, the Company sought to confirm that its executive compensation program was meeting its primary goals: attracting and retaining talented executives; motivating and rewarding these executives with pay for performance opportunities; and providing short-term cash and long-term equity compensation to executives in a manner that serves the Company's best interests.

    Following analysis ofreview the Company's existing executive compensation program and the programs of peer group companies and other companies known for compensation "best practices,practices." theThe Company reviewedseeks to confirm that each of its compensation elements, to determine theas well as its compensation structure, that best fits the Company in light of its history, culture, performance and strategy. Based on this reviewParticular attention is given to the Company's stock price performance to ensure proper alignment between executive compensation and analysis, the Company focused onstock price performance.

    The Compensation Committee took the following key actions in setting and approving executive compensation in Fiscal 2011:2014, each of which is described in detail below:



    Date

    Compensation Committee Action

    June 2013Approved Fiscal 2014 peer group for executive compensation
    July 2013•  Approved Fiscal 2014 base salaries







    •  Approved Fiscal 2014 short-term incentive plan









    •  Approved Fiscal 2014 long-term incentive plan









    •  Approved Fiscal 2014 target total direct compensation for named executive officers


    July 2014Approved annual cash bonuses awarded under the Fiscal 2014 short-term incentive plan based upon Fiscal 2014 performance
      Approving the Company's peer group;

      Setting target total direct compensation;

      Approving competitive base salaries; and

      Paying for performance under the Company's short-term and long-term incentive plans.

      A.
      Approving the Company'sFiscal 2014 Peer Group

    The Compensation Committee re-examined the peer group it established in Fiscal 2010 for executive compensation purposes. Total compensation opportunities for the Company's key executives, including each named executive officer, are intended to be competitive with those offered by other companies competing for talent in the Company's employment market. The Compensation Committee, working with its independent compensation consultant, reviews the compensation paid by the peer group of companies in determining base salaries, annual cash incentive opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities provided to its executive officers.

    In July 2010,June 2013, the Compensation Committee usedreviewed its peer group for executive compensation purposes using the following criteria in reviewing the Company's existing peer group:criteria: company type (publicly traded on a major exchange); locationindustry classification (using Standard and Poor's GICS codes); annual revenues (one-half to two times the Company's annual revenues); and business model (organizations that conducted business in the Company's two operating segments — Aviation Services and Technology


    Table of Contents


    (headquartered in the United States); industry type (using Standard and Poor's GICS codes); annual revenues (one-third to three times the Company's annual revenues); businesses that are similar to the Company's business groups; stock price volatility; and various financial performance measures (including revenue growth, net income growth, earnings per share growth, total return, return on average assets, and market capitalization)Products). The Company determined that allCompensation Committee's objective is to assemble a set of the peer group companies from Fiscal 2010 remained appropriateto which relevant pay and accordingly, no changes wereperformance comparisons may be made with the Company.

    The Compensation Committee acted on the recommendation of Mercer (US) Inc. ("Mercer"), its independent compensation consultant, and the Company's management to revise the Fiscal 2011Company's peer group which consistedfor Fiscal 2014 to consist of the following 25 companies:18 companies, up from 17 peer companies in Fiscal 2013:

     Aircastle Ltd.H&E Equipment Services,Alliant Techsystems, Inc.   Rockwell Collins,Kennametal Inc.  

     B/E Aerospace,

    Applied Industrial Technologies Inc.

       HEICO Corp.Spirit AeroSystems Holdings
    Cascade CorporationHexcel CorporationTeledyne Technologies Incorporated
    Curtiss-Wright CorporationInterline Brands, Inc.The Greenbrier Companies,Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.  

     Ducommun IncorporatedKaman CorporationTransDigm Group

    B/E Aerospace, Inc.

    DXP Enterprises, Inc.Ladish Co., Inc.Triumph Group, Inc.
    Dyncorp International Inc.Lawson ProductsWabtec Corporation
    Esterline Technologies Corporation

       Moog Inc.  

     
    FreightCar America, Inc.

    Crane Co.

       MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.  

    Cubic Corporation

       Rockwell Collins, Inc. 

    Curtiss-Wright Corporation

       Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.

    Esterline Technologies Corporation

    Teledyne Technologies, Inc.

    Hexcel Corporation

    TransDigm Group Inc.

    Kaman Corporation

    Triumph Group, Inc.  

    The two companies added to the Fiscal 2014 peer group were Alliant Techsystems, Inc. and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. The one company dropped from the Fiscal 2014 peer group was Interline Brands, Inc., which was acquired and is no longer a public company. The Compensation Committee withannually revisits the assistancecomposition of its independentthe peer group to ensure that the Company's performance and executive compensation consultant, compiled relevant base salary, annual cash incentiveprogram are measured against those of comparably-sized and long-term incentive information forsituated companies. The mix of the key executivesCompany's commercial and defense businesses presents a challenge in constructing a peer group, given that many defense contractors have substantially greater resources than the Company.

    Following the Compensation Committee's approval of the Fiscal 2014 peer group, Mercer conducted an executive compensation assessment in July 2013, at the companies indirection of the Compensation Committee, to assist with executive compensation decisions. Mercer's executive compensation assessment included (i) a benchmarking analysis showing how the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers compared to compensation paid to the named executive officers of the Company's peer group companies and (ii) a separatecomparison of the Company's financial performance against the financial performance of its peer group companies. The key findings of 91 general industry companies with revenuesthe Mercer' executive compensation assessment of the Company are set forth below:

      The Company's base salaries are generally at the 50th percentile of its peer group companies;

      Actual cash compensation (base salary plus cash bonus) is slightly above the 75th percentile of the Company's peer group companies;

      Actual total direct compensation (base salary plus cash bonus plus the three-year average of stock awards) falls between $500 millionthe 50th and $3 billion. 75th percentiles of the Company's peer group companies;

    Table of Contents

      The Company had the highest one-year total stockholder return compared to its peer group companies; it outperformed its peer group on one-year free cash flow growth, was at the median for one-year net income growth and lagged its peer group in other one-year metrics (e.g., earnings per share growth, revenue growth and return on invested capital); and

      The Company's three-year financial performance showed the Company outperforming its peer group in revenue growth and net income growth and trailing its peer group in other areas (e.g., earnings per share growth, return on invested capital and total stockholder return).

    The Compensation Committee considered this information and, in particular, benchmarkedthe Mercer executive compensation assessment, including the executive compensation levels of the peer group companies, in settingapproving the Fiscal 20112014 base salaries, target annual cash incentivesbonuses and target long-term incentive compensation of the Company's named executive officers, eachofficers. In addition, the Compensation Committee recognized that the Company has posted significant stock price increases in the last two fiscal years following a disappointing result in Fiscal 2012, as shown below:

     
     
     Fiscal Year
      
     Opening
    Stock Price
    on June 1 ($)

      
     Closing
    Stock Price
    on May 31 ($)

      
     Increase (Decrease) (%)
      

      

     2014    20.06    24.30    21  

      

     

    2013

        12.05    20.06    66  

      

     

    2012

        25.78    12.05    (53) 

    As a part of its approval process, the Compensation Committee took into account that the Company has a higher percentage of defense business than most of its peer group companies, and that defense businesses experienced more modest performance returns than commercial businesses in Fiscal 2014.

    Based in part on its consideration of Mercer's executive compensation assessment showing that the Company's performance was below its peers in certain respects, including three-year total stockholder return (due to Fiscal 2012 stock price performance), the Compensation Committee took the actions described below.in more detail below — namely, reduced Fiscal 2014 annual cash bonuses by 30%; reduced Fiscal 2015 stock awards by 43% for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer and at least 25% for all other named executive officers; and froze Fiscal 2015 base salaries for all named executive officers.

      B.
      Setting Target Total Direct Compensation

    The Compensation Committee reviewed and approved Fiscal 2011 target "total direct compensation" for the named executive officers, consisting of three compensation elements: base salary, annual cash incentive and long-term incentive compensation, as follows:

      Base salary:  Approved in July 2010; effective for June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011.

      Annual cash incentive:  Approved targets in July 2010; actual awards determined and approved in July 2011 based on the Company's performance from June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011.

      Long-term incentive compensation:  Approved grants of performance-based restricted stock, stock options and time-based restricted stock in July 2010 as potential compensation to be realized only if certain performance and vesting conditions are satisfied.

    The Compensation Committee historically benchmarks target total direct compensation for the Company's named executive officers in the 50th to 75th percentile of total direct compensation levels of comparable positions at its peer group companies. For Fiscal 2011, the Compensation


    Table of Contents


    Committee set target total direct compensation for the named executive officers in the following amounts:

     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Target Total Direct Compensation
      

     

     David P Storch   $4,149,013  

     

     

    Timothy J. Romenesko

       $2,078,538  

     

     

    Richard J. Poulton

       $1,341,796  

     

     

    Terry D. Stinson

       $1,011,410  

     

     

    Robert J. Regan

       $1,341,796  

    The table below shows base salary, target annual cash incentive and target long-term incentive compensation, each as a dollar amount and as a percentage of target total direct compensation, set by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of Fiscal 2011 for each named executive officer.

     
      
      
     Target Total Direct Compensation
      
     
      
      
     Base
    Salary

      
     Target Annual
    Cash Incentive

      
     Target Long-Term
    Incentive Compensation

      
     
      
      
      
     
     Named Executive Officer

      
     Dollar
    Amount

      
     % of Total
    Target Direct
    Compensation

      
     Dollar
    Amount

      
     % of Total
    Target Direct
    Compensation

      
     Dollar
    Amount

      
     % of Total
    Target Direct
    Compensation

      

     

     David P. Storch   $850,000    20.5%   $935,000    22.5%   $2,364,013    57.0%  

     

     

    Timothy J. Romenesko

       $468,180    22.5%   $468,180    22.5%   $1,142,178    55.0%  

     

     

    Richard J. Poulton

       $367,200    27.4%   $293,760    21.9%   $680,836    50.7%  

     

     

    Terry D. Stinson

       $338,130    33.4%   $428,130    42.3%*  $245,150    24.2%  

     

     

    Robert J. Regan

       $367,200    27.4%   $293,760    21.9%   $680,836    50.7%  
    *
    The annual cash incentive opportunity for Mr. Stinson, Group Vice President of Structures and Systems, is a more significant part of his target total direct compensation due to the Company's emphasis on the annual results of its business groups.

    Variable performance-based compensation — meaning annual cash incentive, performance-based restricted stock and stock options but not including base salary and time-based restricted stock — comprises a significant percentage of target total direct compensation for each named executive officer: Mr. Storch: 62.0%; Mr. Romenesko: 60.6%; Mr. Poulton: 57.0%; Mr. Stinson: 66.6%; and Mr. Regan: 57.0%.

      C.
      Approving Competitive2014 Base Salaries

    The Compensation Committee generally sets the base salaries of the Company's named executive officers inat or around the 50th to 75th percentile of salary levels of comparable positions at its peer group companies. The Company does not target base salaries at any specific percentage of total compensation when setting base salary; however, given the Company's emphasis on the link between pay and performance, base salaries are a less significant percentage of total direct compensation compared to the Company's variable performance-based compensation, as shown incompensation.

    The Compensation Committee, at management's recommendation, approved a 2% increase over Fiscal 2013 year-end base salaries for the above table.named executive officers.


    Table of Contents

    For Fiscal 2011, the Company instituted a Company-wide 2% merit pool increase in Fiscal 2011 base salaries, effective June 1, 2010 (except that the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Storch's base salary by 6% per the terms his employment agreement, and Mr. Romenesko received a 3% increase). The table below shows Fiscal 20112014 base salaries compared to Fiscal 20102013 base salaries for the named executive officers:officers (note that Fiscal 2013 base salaries were the amounts paid in Fiscal 2013, not the year-end base salaries):

     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Fiscal 2011 ($)
      
     Fiscal 2010 ($)
      

     

     David P. Storch    850,000    799,208  

     

     

    Timothy J. Romenesko

        468,180    454,500  

     

     

    Richard J. Poulton

        367,200    360,000  

     

     

    Terry D. Stinson

        338,130    327,897* 

     

     

    Robert J. Regan

        367,200    354,961  
    *
    Mr. Stinson received $341,230 in Fiscal 2010, an amount that included $13,333 of retroactive salary that should have been paid in Fiscal 2009.
     
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Fiscal 2013 ($)
      
     Fiscal 2014 ($)
      

      

     

    David P. Storch

        877,838    906,449  

      

     

    Timothy J. Romenesko

        483,513    499,272  

      

     

    John C. Fortson

        N/A    400,000  

      

     

    Randy J. Martinez

        349,070    360,447  

      

     

    Robert J. Regan

        379,226    391,586  

      

     

    Michael J. Sharp

        312,576    360,353  
      D.C.
      Paying for Performance underAnnual Cash Bonuses Under the Company'sFiscal 2014 Short-Term and Long-Term Incentive PlansPlan

    The Compensation Committee continued its practice in Fiscal 2011 of providing that variable performance-based compensation shall constitute the majority of the target total direct compensation awarded to2014 short-term incentive plan provides certain employees, including the named executive officers. Specifically,officers, with the Compensation Committee provided for a short-term incentive as a percentage of base salary and long-term incentive compensation weighted 40% toward performance-based restricted stock, 30% toward stock options and 30% toward time-based restricted stock. The Compensation Committee sets the types and levels of performance-based awards so that superior performance is rewarded with superior compensation, while below target performance results in below target compensation. Generally, asopportunity to earn an executive's level of responsibility increases, a greater percentage of total compensation opportunity is based on performance, and the mix of total compensation shifts toward stock compensation and away from cash compensation. This approach aligns the long-term interests of the executives with those of stockholders.

    The Company pays for performance primarily through its short-term incentive plan and its long-term incentive plan.

    1.
    Fiscal 2011 Short-Term Incentive Plan. The Fiscal 2011 short-term incentive plan retained the use of net income and a leverage ratio as the performance goals for eligibility for annual cash incentive awards. The Compensation Committee also implementedbonus. This plan works in collaboration with the AAR CORP. Section 162(m) Annual Cash Incentive Plan. The purpose of this plan was to setPlan, which sets a ceiling on the performance-basedannual cash bonuses payable under the short-term incentive plan to ensure that suchenable the bonuses to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and are, thus, fully deductibleas determined by the Company.Compensation Committee. The Section 162(m) Annual Cash Incentive Plan uses as its performance goal the Company's net income for a given fiscal year. It establishes a maximum award opportunity for each participant, expressed as a percentage of net income (e.g., the maximum annual award is 5% of net income for the Chief Executive Officer, 3% for the President and 2% for all others), and then provides that the Compensation Committee has the discretion to reduce these amounts so that the actual bonuses to be paid to participants will be the bonuses determined under the Company's Fiscal 2014 short-term incentive plan.

    In all years since the inception of the Section 162(m) Annual Cash Incentive Plan, including Fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee has exercised negative discretion to reduce the annual cash bonuses of the named executive officer.

    Fiscal 20112014 Performance Goals.    In looking at the design of the short-term incentive plan for Fiscal 2011, theThe Compensation Committee determined,approved, after consideration of peer group


    Table of Contents

        information, other market data, and the current state of the business environment in which the Company operates, that net income and a leverage ratio continued to be the appropriatetwo performance goals under the Fiscal 2014 short-term incentive plan for corporate officers, including Mr. Storch, Mr. Romenesko, Mr. Fortson, Mr. Regan and Mr. Sharp: earnings per share and cash flow from operations at the Company. Accordingly,targets set forth in July 2010, the Compensation Committee approved Fiscal 2011table below:

         
         
         Performance Goal
          
         Target
          
         Percentage Weighting
          

          

         

        Earnings per share

           $2.02    75% 

          

         

        Cash flow from operations

           $120 million    25% 

        Earnings per share has been used as a performance goals for annualgoal in past years, and cash incentive opportunities for Messrs. Storch, Romenesko, Poulton and Regan based onflow from operations is a new performance goal this year. Previously the Company's net income (target of $56.88 million) and a leverage ratio (target of 45% or less). The net income target represented a 27% increase over Fiscal 2010 actual net income of $44.63 million. For purposes of measuring attainment of these performance goals in Fiscal 2011,Company had used free cash flow, but the Compensation Committee determined that: (i) net income means consolidated net income, excluding special chargesthat cash flow from operations is a better measure


        Table of Contents

        than free cash flow for the Company because it shows how well the Company's businesses are producing cash that will ultimately benefit stockholders, whether in the form of increased investment, stock repurchases or unusual or infrequent items during the fiscal year, and as adjusted for changes in generally accepted accounting principles, and (ii) leverage ratio means an average total recourse net debt to capital ratio.dividend payouts. The choice of theseearnings per share and cash flow from operations performance measures reflectedgoals reflects the strongCompany's continuing emphasis placed by the Company on preserving and growing stockholder wealth and maintaining a strong balance sheet.

        For Fiscal 2011, theThe Compensation Committee approved performance goalsdetermined that for Mr. Stinson's annual cash incentive opportunity based on the following financial measures for his Structures and Systems business group rather than overall Company performance: (i) pre-tax income; (ii) return on invested capital; and (iii) pre-tax cash flow. The choicepurposes of measuring attainment of these performance goals in Fiscal 2014: (i) earnings per share means diluted earnings per share as disclosed by the Company in its periodic reports filed with the SEC, as adjusted for Mr. Stinson likewise reflected the Company's emphasis on cash generation and preservation, as well as the Compensation Committee's belief that achievement ofspecial charges or unusual or infrequent items incurred during the performance goal targets would require superior performanceperiod, and (ii) cash flow from operations means cash flow from operations as disclosed by the Structures and Systems business group.

        The net income and leverage ratio performance goals are each weighted 50%Company in its periodic reports filed with the SEC, as adjusted for purposes of determining the annual cash incentive for Messrs. Storch, Romenesko, Poulton and Regan. For Mr. Stinson,working capital investments in certain original equipment manufacturers' programs, special charges or unusual or infrequent items incurred during the performance goals are weighted as follows: pre-tax income (79%), pre-tax cash flow (9%), and return on invested capital (12%). This weighting reflected the Company's view as to the relative importance of the performance goals and a desire to incentivize executive officers and other employees receiving such awards in line with the interests of stockholders.period.

        The Fiscal 20112014 annual cash incentive awardbonus opportunities approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of Fiscal 2011,threshold, target and maximum levels, expressed as a percentage of base salary and in dollar amounts for the named executive officers, are set forth in the table below:

     
     
     Percentage of Base Salary
      
     
     Name
      
     Threshold (%)
      
     Target (%)
      
     Maximum (%)
      

     

     David P. Storch1   77   110   165  

      

     Timothy J. Romenesko1   70   100   150  

      

     Richard J. Poulton1   56   80   120  

      

     Terry D. Stinson2      127     

      

     Robert J. Regan1   56   80   120  
     
     
      
     Threshold
      
     Target
      
     Maximum
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Percent of
    Base Salary
    (%)

      
     ($)
      
     Percent of
    Base Salary
    (%)

      
     ($)
      
     Percent of
    Base Salary
    (%)

      
     ($)
      
       David P. Storch    62.5    566,531    125.0    1,133,061    250.0    2,266,122  
       Timothy J. Romenesko    56.8    283,677    113.6    567,354    227.2    1,134,708  
       John C. Fortson    45.5    181,818    90.9    363,637    181.8    727,274  
       Robert J. Regan    45.5    177,994    90.9    355,988    181.8    711,976  
       Michael J. Sharp    38.4    138,204    76.7    276,407    153.4    552,814  
        1
        An

        For Messrs. Storch, Romenesko, Fortson, Regan and Sharp, an annual cash incentive award required: (i) at the threshold level, requires attainment of net incomeearnings per share of at least $47.4 million (83%$1.62 (80% of the target of $56.88$2.02) and cash flow from operations of at least $90 million (75% of the target of $120 million); (ii) at the target level, attainment of 100% of the performance goal targets (earnings per share of $2.02 and cash flow from operations of $120 million); and (iii) at the maximum level, attainment of at least 120% of the earnings per share performance goal targets (earnings per share of at least $2.42) and at least 125% of the cash flow from operations performance goal target (cash flow from operations of at least $150 million).

        Mr. Martinez is Aviation Services Group Vice President — Airlift and in that capacity he participates in a separate bonus program tied to the performance of this business unit rather than to the overall performance of the Company. Mr. Martinez's Fiscal 2014 performance goals were Airlift's pre-tax income (threshold of $21 million and a target of $26 million) and an average leverage ratiofree cash flow (threshold of at

    $49 million and a target of $61 million). Mr. Martinez's target bonus for Fiscal 2014 was $360,447 and his maximum bonus was $720,894. Mr. Martinez's bonus opportunity was designed to provide appropriate incentive for excellent performance in Airlift's pre-tax income and free cash flow performance.


    Table of Contents

          least 50% (versus the target of 45%). An annual cash incentive award at the target level requires attainment of 100% of the performance goal targets (net income of $56.88 million and a leverage ratio of 45%), and an annual cash incentive award at the maximum level requires attainment of 120% of such performance goal targets (net income of at least $68.256 million and leverage ratio of at least 40%).

        2
        Mr. Stinson's Fiscal 2011 target annual cash incentive award opportunities were tied to the performance of the Structures and Systems business group: $338,130 based on pre-tax income; $40,000 based on pre-tax cash flow; and $50,000 based on return on invested capital; for a total target annual cash incentive award opportunity of $428,130 (which, for comparison purposes, equaled 127% of Mr. Stinson's Fiscal 2011 base salary). The annual cash incentive award opportunities based on the cash flow and return on invested capital performance goals are either earned in full or not at all depending upon whether the Structures and Systems business group achieves the designated performance goal targets. As to the pre-tax income performance goal, (i) no annual cash incentive award is payable unless the business group achieves the pre-tax income performance goal target at an 80% level (in which case Mr. Stinson is entitled to a $270,504 annual cash incentive award); achievement of the pre-tax income performance goal target at a 100% level results in a target annual cash incentive award of $338,130 and achievement between 80% and 100% results in a pro-rata annual cash incentive award between $270,504 and $338,130; and (ii) Mr. Stinson is entitled to 1% of any pre-tax income in excess of the Structures and Systems business group's Fiscal 2011 pre-tax income performance goal target and up to $80,000 based on the pre-tax income performance of specific companies in his business group.

      Fiscal 20112014 Actual Results.    The Company reportedCompany's actual Fiscal 2011 net income2014 results compared to the targets as follows:

       
        
        
       
       Performance Goal
        
       Target
        
       Actual
        
       Actual as
      Percentage of Target

        

        

       Earnings per share   $2.02   $1.83    90.6% 

        

       

      Cash flow from operations

         $120 million   $167.8 million    139.8% 

      There were no adjustments made to earnings per share results of $69.8$1.83, and the cash flow from operations of $167.8 million (adjustedreflects a $28 million adjustment for the Company's working capital investment in a customer program. Excluding this adjustment, cash flow from operations was $139.8 million or 116.5% above the target of $120 million.

      Based on the earnings per share and cash flow from operations results, the Fiscal 2014 cash bonuses payable to $68.2 millionMessrs. Storch, Romenesko, Fortson, Regan and Sharp under the short-term incentive plan), compared to its net income targetterms of $56.88 million. The Company'sthe Fiscal 2011 leverage ratio was 34.3%, compared to its leverage ratio target of 45%. As a result of this exceptional performance, the2014 short-term incentive plan paid out just below the maximum level for Fiscal 2011, producing above-targetwould have represented 107% of their target annual cash incentivesbonuses. However, management instead recommended — and the Compensation Committee approved — Fiscal 2014 cash bonuses equal to 75.2% of the target bonus awards. This represented a 30% reduction for the four named executive officers other thanin the cash bonuses otherwise determined by Formula under the Fiscal 2014 short-term incentive plan. These bonus reductions applied only to the five named executive officers at the corporate level; Mr. Stinson. The Structures and SystemsMartinez, Group Vice President at the Company's Airlift subsidiary, received his entire earned bonus given the performance of his business group also exceededunit in Fiscal 2014.

      Despite the Company's above-target performance in Fiscal 2014, including its pre-tax, return on invested capital and pre-taxexceptional cash flow performance goal targets forresults, management and the Compensation Committee reduced Fiscal 2011, thus resulting in an above-target bonus for Mr. Stinson.

      The following table shows the target2014 annual cash incentive award amountbonuses principally in response to the Company's challenging operational environment, which negatively affected Fiscal 2014 sales (down 4.8% from Fiscal 2013) and caused the actual award amountCompany to effect reductions in force at several businesses to align its staffing resources with business demand and corporate strategy.

      The table below reflects the cash bonus reductions, which totaled $868,505 for the listed named executive officers, by showing, for each named executive officer, based upon the Company's net income and leverage performance (andtarget bonus, the bonus determined by the performance offormula under the StructuresFiscal 2014 short-term incentive plan and Systems business group in the case of Mr. Stinson) in Fiscal 2011:actual cash bonus approved by the Compensation Committee at management's recommendation.

     
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Target Award
      
     Actual Award
      

     

     David P Storch   $935,000   $1,400,900  

     

     

    Timothy J. Romenesko

       $468,180   $701,469  

     

     

    Richard J. Poulton

       $293,760   $440,137  

     

     

    Terry D. Stinson

       $428,130   $470,653  

     

     

    Robert J. Regan

       $293,760   $440,137  
     
     
      
      
     Fiscal 2014 Annual Cash Bonus
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Target Bonus
    ($)

      
     Bonus Determined
    Under the
    Short-Term
    Incentive Plan ($)

      
     Actual Bonus
    ($)

      
     Percentage
    Reduction in Actual
    Bonus Over Bonus
    Determined Under
    the Plan (%)

      

      

     David P. Storch    1,133,061    1,216,498    851,548    30  

      

     

    Timothy J. Romenesko

        567,354    609,133    426,393    30  

      

     

    John C. Fortson

        363,637    390,415    273,290    30  

      

     

    Robert J. Regan

        355,988    382,202    267,541    30  

      

     

    Michael J. Sharp

        276,407    296,762    207,733    30  

    Table of Contents

    Mr. Martinez received an annual cash bonus of $570,029 based upon Airlift's performance in Fiscal 2014, in which Airlift exceeded its pre-tax income and free cash flow targets.

      2.D.
      Stock Awards Under the Fiscal 20112014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.Plan

    The principal design change for Fiscal 2011 was the movement from a single equity performance vehicle —Compensation Committee granted awards of performance-based restricted stock, — to three types of equity awards: performance-based restricted stock (40% of the total long-term incentive compensation), time-based restricted stock (30% of the total long-term incentive compensation), and stock options (30% of the total long-term incentive compensation). As a result, 70% of the total long-term incentive plan — i.e., performance-based restricted stock and stock options — consists of performance-based compensation. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a single performance goal for performance-based restricted stock awards: cumulative net income over a three-year period. This structure contrasts with recent long-term incentive programs which had two performance goals (net income and a leverage ratio) with three separate performance periods over a two-year program period (the first fiscal year, the second fiscal year and the combined two fiscal-year period).

    The Compensation Committee believes that the Fiscal 2011 long-term incentive plan design serves several related purposes: (i) it allows the multiple performance vehicles to incentivize different objectives (e.g., executive retention, Company performance and stock price appreciation); (ii) it avoids duplication of the performance goals and the annual performance periods used in the short-term incentive plan; (iii) it measures performance over a longer period, thereby contributing to the long-term tenure of the Company's executives; and (iv) it aligns the Company's approach more closely to market practice based upon the advice of the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant.

    Below is a brief description of each type of equity award under the Company's Fiscal 2011 long-term incentive plan:

    Performance-Based Restricted Stock:  In July 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a performance-based restricted stock program for Fiscal 2011 for the Company's named executive officers and certain other officers and key employees. employees under the Fiscal 2014 long-term incentive plan. For the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee allocated the dollar value of the stock awards as follows: performance-based restricted stock — 23%; time-based restricted stock — 23%; and stock options — 54%. Mr. Martinez received only stock option awards in Fiscal 2014, consistent with the Company's general approach in providing Group Vice Presidents with relatively modest equity compensation awards and significant cash bonus opportunities.

    The Compensation Committee determines the annual allocation of stock awards among performance-based restricted stock, time-based restricted stock and stock options based on a variety of factors, including: its preference for performance-based awards; the Company's burn rate commitment under the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan; the number of participants in the program; the positions of responsibility, seniority and overall compensation levels of the participants; the Company's performance in the last fiscal year and its forecasted performance in the current fiscal year; the Company's budget for compensation expense; and the Company' stock price. For Fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee determined that setting performance-based stock awards (performance-based restricted stock and stock options) at 77% and time-based restricted stock at 23% was the proper allocation.

    The Fiscal 2014 stock awards represented a 10% increase over the number of shares awarded in Fiscal 2013. The Compensation Committee approved this increase to reward executives for the stock price increase in Fiscal 2013 (up to $20.06 per share from $12.05 per share) and to incentivize Fiscal 2014 performance. The increase also took account of the 40% reduction in the prior year's stock awards due to concerns at that time about the stock price.

    Performance-Based Restricted Stock.    At its meeting on July 15, 2013 the Compensation Committee approved the following grants of performance-based restricted stock to Mr. Storch, Mr. Romenesko, Mr. Fortson, Mr. Regan and Mr. Sharp for Fiscal 2014, subject to a three-year cumulative net income performance condition and vesting requirements, each as described below (dollar value based on the grant date fair value):

     
     
      
     Performance-Based Restricted Stock
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Number of Shares
      
     Dollar Value ($)
      
       David P. Storch    26,400    671,352  
       Timothy J. Romenesko    13,200    335,676  
       John C. Fortson    4,750    120,793  
       Robert J. Regan    7,920    201,406  
       Michael J. Sharp    3,168    80,562  

    Shares of performance-based restricted stock are earned (subjectsubject to vesting) at the end of thea performance period if the Company achievescondition and time-based vesting requirements. If cumulative net income of $184,654,000performance for the three-year performance period beginning June 1, 2010 and ending May 31, 2013. This cumulative net income target represented an 8% compounded annual growth in net income over the three-year performance period, starting with the target net income goal for Fiscal 2011 of $56,880,000.

    The program includes a stock price acceleration provision (the "First Trigger") under which the shares of performance-based restricted stock will be earned (subject to vesting) on the 20th consecutive trading day on which the Company's Common Stock trades at an average price equal to or greater than $24.48 per share, which is 33% above its price of $18.39 on June 1, 2010, the beginning of the performance period. Subject to this First Trigger, the program provides that no shares of restricted stock will be earned unless the Company achieves its performance goal target at an 80% level (cumulative net income of $147,700,000), in which case 70% of the target number of shares of restricted stock will be earned (subject to vesting). Achievement of the performance goal target between 80% and 100% will result in a pro-rata number of target shares of restricted stock being earned, and achievement of the performance goal targets at 100% will result in all of the target shares being earned (in each case, subject to vesting). Achievement above 100% will result in the grant of additional shares, with achievement at 120% (cumulative net


    Table of Contents

        performance period beginning June 1, 2013 and ending May 31, 2016 is less than $210.4 million (80% of target net income), the performance condition is not met and the shares are forfeited. Cumulative net income performance (i) at a threshold level of $221,585,000) or above resulting$210.4 million (80% of target net income) results in an additional granta payout of 50% of the shares, equal to(ii) at a target level of $263 million results in a payment of 100% of the initial grant. An additional grant alsoshares, (iii) at a maximum level of $315.6 million (120% of target net income) results in a payout of 200% of the shares, and (iv) at levels between threshold and target and target and maximum, the shares will be made underpaid out on a second stock price acceleration provision (the "Second Trigger") where the Company's Common Stock tradesstraight-line basis, in each case subject to time-based vesting requirements. These performance measures are designed to be "stretch" measures, and it is not uncommon for 20 consecutive trading days at an average price equal to or greater than $27.95 per share, which is 52% above its priceshares of $18.39 on June 1, 2010, the beginning of the performance period.

        The Fiscal 2011 performance-based restricted stock has a three-year vesting period that runs concurrently withto be forfeited for failing to meet the three-yearapplicable performance period. Thus, ifmeasures (e.g., approximately 25% of the shares of the Fiscal 2012 performance-based restricted stock awards are earnedaward were forfeited as a result of the First Trigger,Company not meeting its cumulative net income performance target for the three-year period ending May 31, 2014). The Compensation Committee believes that the performance-based nature of these restricted stock awards provide appropriate incentives to executives in line with the interests of the Company's stockholders.

        If the performance condition is met, the shares still remain subject to a three-year vesting period requiring continued employment with the Company.of performance-based restricted stock vest 331/3% on each of May 31, 2016, May 31, 2017, and May 31, 2018. The Compensation Committee believes that the use of a meaningful time vesting period encourages executives to build their careers with the Company and contributes to greater stability within the Company's executive leadership.

        At its meeting on July 12, 2010, the Compensation Committee approved the following grants of performance-based Performance-based restricted stock, to the named executive officers for Fiscal 2011,once vested, is not subject to any further holding requirement beyond the performance and vesting conditions described above (dollar value based on the grant date fair value):

     
     
      
     Target Performance-Based Restricted Stock
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Number of Shares
      
     Dollar Value
      
      David P. Storch    56,109   $969,003  
      Timothy J. Romenesko    27,109   $468,172  
      Richard J. Poulton    16,159   $279,066  
      Terry D. Stinson    5,000   $86,350  
      Robert J. Regan    16,159   $279,066  

        On December 9, 2010, the Company met the First Trigger when its Common Stock traded at an average price greater than $24.48 per share for 20 consecutive trading days, thus causing the shares of performance-based restrictedCompany's stock to be earned (subject to vesting) in the amounts set forth in the above table. These shares of performance-based restricted stock will not vest until May 31, 2013. On July 15, 2011, the Company met the Second Trigger when its Common Stock traded at an average price greater than $27.95 per share for 20 consecutive trading days, thus resulting in additional grants equal in amount to those set forth in the above table. These additional shares vest 331/3% on May 31, 2013, 331/3% on May 31, 2014 and 331/3% on May 31, 2015.ownership guidelines.

      Time-Based Restricted Stock.    At its meeting on July 12, 2010,15, 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the following grants of time-based restricted stock awards to the Company's


    Table of Contents

        named executive officers for Fiscal 2011,2014, subject to time-based vesting (dollar value based on the grant date fair value):

     
     
      
     Target Time-Based Restricted Stock
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Number of Shares
      
     Dollar Value
      
      David P. Storch    42,082   $726,756  
      Timothy J. Romenesko    20,332   $351,134  
      Richard J. Poulton    12,120   $209,312  
      Robert J. Regan    12,120   $209,312  
     
     
      
     Time-Based Restricted Stock
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Number of Shares
      
     Dollar Value ($)
      
       David P. Storch    26,400    671,352  
       Timothy J. Romenesko    13,200    335,676  
       John C. Fortson    4,750    120,793  
       Robert J. Regan    7,920    201,406  
       Michael J. Sharp    3,168    80,562  

        For Fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee decided to place less emphasis on time-based restricted stock (23% of total stock awards) in favor of greater emphasis on performance-based restricted stock and stock options (77% of total stock awards). The shares of time-based restricted stock vest 50% on May 31, 20142017 and 50% May 31, 2015.2018. Time-based restricted stock, once vested, is not subject to any further holding requirements beyond the Company's stock ownership guidelines. The Compensation Committee believes that time-based restricted stock serves a valuable purpose in helping to retain executives and reward them for building a career with the Company.


      Table of Contents

      Stock Options.    At its meeting on July 12, 2010,15, 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the following grants of stock option grantsoptions to the Company's named executive officers for Fiscal 2011,2014, subject to time-based vesting (dollar value based on a modified Black-Scholes valuation):

     
     
      
     Target Stock Options
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Number
      
     Dollar Value
      
      David P. Storch    84,163   $668,254  
      Timothy J. Romenesko    40,664   $332,872  
      Richard J. Poulton    24,239   $192,458  
      Terry D. Stinson    20,000   $158,800  
      Robert J. Regan    24,239   $192,458  
     
     
      
     Stock Options
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Number
      
     Dollar Value ($)
      
       David P. Storch    158,400    1,622,016  
       Timothy J. Romenesko    79,200    811,008  
       John C. Fortson    44,768    458,424  
       Randy J. Martinez    27,500    281,600  
       Robert J. Regan    47,520    486,605  
       Michael J. Sharp    19,008    194,642  

        The stock options have an exercise price of $17.27 per$25.43 share (the closing stock price of the Common Stock on the date of grant), vest 331/3% on each of May 31, 2011, May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2013,20% per year over a five-year period and expire 10 years from the date of grant or earliergrant. Shares issued upon terminationthe exercise of employment.vested stock options are not subject to any further holding requirements beyond the Company's stock ownership guidelines. The Compensation Committee views stock options as performance-based incentives that align the interests of the Company's executives with the interests of the Company's stockholders given that stock options provide no value without an increase in the stock price over the option exercise price.

      E.
      Total Direct Compensation

    The Compensation Committee reviewed and approved Fiscal 20122014 target "total direct compensation" for the named executive officers, consisting of the three compensation elements discussed above: base salary, target annual cash incentive compensation and target long-term stock incentive compensation. Total direct compensation is the sum of base salary, annual cash incentive compensation and long-term stock incentive compensation.

    The Compensation Committee historically benchmarks target total direct compensation for the Company's named executive officers in the range of the 50th to 75th percentile of total direct compensation levels of comparable positions at its peer group companies, with benchmarks above the 50th percentile typically requiring performance above the 50th percentile. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers the Company's prior year's financial results in setting target total direct compensation for the upcoming year. In setting target total compensation, the Compensation Committee seeks to promote its goals of motivating and rewarding executives and providing appropriate pay-for-performance incentives.

    The table below divides target total direct compensation into its component parts — base salary, target annual cash bonuses and target long-term incentive compensation — and shows each as a dollar amount and as a percentage of target total direct compensation, as set by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of Fiscal 2014 for each named executive officer. As shown, target total direct compensation is heavily weighted toward variable performance-based compensation (annual cash bonuses and long-term incentive compensation), consistent with the


    Table of Contents

    Compensation Committee's view that compensation for the named executive officers should be tied to performance.

     
      
      
     Fiscal 2014 Target Total Direct Compensation
      
     
      
      
     Base
    Salary

      
     Target Annual Cash
    Incentive

      
     Target Long-Term
    Incentive Compensation

      
     
      
      
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Dollar
    Amount
    ($)

      
     % of Total
    Target Direct
    Compensation

      
     Dollar
    Amount
    ($)

      
     % of Total
    Target Direct
    Compensation

      
     Dollar
    Amount
    ($)

      
     % of Total
    Target Direct
    Compensation

      

     

     David P. Storch    906,449    18    1,133,061    23    2,964,720    59  

     

     

    Timothy J. Romenesko

        499,272    20    567,354    22    1,482,360    58  

     

     

    John C. Fortson

        400,000    27    363,637    25    700,010    48  

     

     

    Randy J. Martinez

        360,447    36    360,447    36    281,600    28  

     

     

    Robert J. Regan

        391,586    24    355,988    22    889,417    54  

     

     

    Michael J. Sharp

        360,353    36    276,407    28    355,766    36  

    Actual total direct compensation differs fromtarget total direct compensation by taking into account the actual annual cash bonus rather than the target annual cash bonus. As actual annual cash bonuses were less than target annual cash bonuses in Fiscal 2014, theactual total direct compensation for each named executive officer likewise was less than histarget total direct compensation in Fiscal 2014.

    The following table shows target total direct compensation versus actual total direct compensation for the named executive officers for Fiscal 2014:

     
     
      
     Fiscal 2014 Total Direct Compensation
      
     
     Named Executive Officer
      
     Target ($)
      
     Actual ($)
      
       David P. Storch    5,004,230    4,722,717  
       Timothy J. Romenesko    2,548,986    2,408,025  
       John C. Fortson    1,463,647    1,373,300  
       Randy J. Martinez    1,002,494    1,212,076  
       Robert J. Regan    1,636,991    1,548,544  
       Michael J. Sharp    992,526    923,852  

    III.  Fiscal 2015 Executive Compensation Decisions.Actions    At meetings held on

    Our Compensation Committee met in July 11, 20112014 and August 15, 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the following Fiscal 20122015 executive compensation actions:actions based on its consideration of performance results for Fiscal 2014, the executive compensation assessment prepared by its independent compensation consultant in July 2014, stockholder concerns identified in our stockholder outreach program and other relevant items:

      Revisions to the Company's peer group, principally due to the Company's substantial annual revenue increase in recent years;Froze base salaries at their Fiscal 2014 levels;

      The Fiscal 2012 target total direct compensation ofReturned earnings per share and cash flow from operations as the Company's executive officers, including a 2% Company-wide merit pool increase in the Fiscal 2012 base salaries of employees making $100,000 or more, including the named executive officers (compared to a 3% base salary increase for employees making less than $100,000);

      Performanceperformance goals under the Fiscal 20122015 short-term incentive plan based on net income and a leverage ratio (average total recourse net debt to capital) for the annual cash incentive opportunities for certain senior executives, including the named executive officers, except for Mr. Stinson and other business group leaders for whom the annualplan;

    Table of Contents

        cash

        Reduced significantly stock awards granted under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive performance goals will be basedplan compared to the stock awards granted under the Fiscal 2014 long-term incentive plan, as shown below:

       
       
       Named Executive Officer
        
       Fiscal 2014
      ($)

        
       Fiscal 2015
      ($)

        
       Percentage Difference
      (%)

        

        

       David P. Storch    2,964,720    1,695,200    43  

        

       

      Timothy J. Romenesko

          1,482,360    847,600    43  

        

       

      John C. Fortson

          700,010    521,600    25  

        

       

      Robert J. Regan

          889,417    521,600    41  

        

       

      Michael J. Sharp

          355,766    260,800    27  

        

       

      Randy J. Martinez

          281,600    208,640    26  
        Altered the mix of stock awards under the Fiscal 2015 long-term incentive plan to place greater emphasis on the pre-tax income,performance-based restricted stock:

       
       
        
       Percentage of Stock
      Awards

        
       
       Type of Long-Term Stock Award
        
       Fiscal 2014
        
       Fiscal 2015
        
         Performance-Based Restricted Stock    23%   75% 
         Time-Based Restricted Stock    23%   25% 
         Stock Options    54%   0% 
        Approved return on invested capital and pre-tax cash flow of their respective business groups;

      Performancecumulative net income as the two performance goals for performance-based restricted stock under the Fiscal 20122015 long-term incentive plan basedplan. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to add a second performance goal — return on invested capital — to cumulative net income, over a three-yearso as to assure that the Company's performance period beginning June 1, 2011 and ending May 31, 2014; and

      The grant of performance-based restricted stock (vesting 331/3% on each of May 31, 2014, May 31, 2015 and May 31, 2016), time-based restricted stock (vesting 50% on May 31, 2015 and 50% on May 31, 2016, and stock options (vesting 20% per year beginning May 31, 2012) as part ofis measured in two separate ways that are critical to the Fiscal 2012 long-term incentive plan.Company's financial success.

    IV.  Our  Key Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

    The following are key factors affecting the executive compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee for the Company's executives, including its named executive officers:

      Stockholder Advisory Vote.  At the Company's 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, holders of approximately 68% of the outstanding shares approved the Fiscal 2013 compensation paid to the named executive officers. Although this stockholder vote on executive compensation was advisory, the Company carefully considered the results of this say-on-pay vote. In response to the say-on-pay vote, the Company conducted a formal stockholder outreach program to gain a better understanding of stockholder concerns related to its executive compensation policies and practices, corporate governance practices and other matters of stockholder interest. This proxy statement contains further information in the "2014 Proxy Statement Summary" and elsewhere in this CD&A about

    Table of Contents

        the Company's Fiscal 2014 stockholder outreach program, including the executive compensation actions taken by the Company in Fiscal 2014.

      Role of the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee is responsible for structuring and administering executive compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of six individuals, each of whom has been determined by the Board of Directors to be (i) an independent director of the Company under applicable SEC and NYSE rules and the Company's Categorical Standards and Policy for Determining Director Independence; (ii) a non-employee director for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (iii) an outside director for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

        The Compensation Committee reviews and considers historical compensation data for the Company's executives. This data includes summaries of cash and equity compensation received in past years by each executive. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews the executives' total annual compensation, including cash and non-cash direct compensation, cumulative benefits and savings under retirement plans and equity compensation programs, perquisites and potential payments on termination of employment, whether on a change in control of the Company or otherwise. It reviews the performance of the Company and the executives during the year, taking into account established goals, leadership qualities, operational performance, business responsibilities, career experience, and long-term potential to enhance stockholder value.

        In addition to peer group compensation information and general industry compensation information, the Compensation Committee reviews internal pay comparisons among the Company's executives to ensure that the Company's executive compensation program reflects the executives' positions, responsibilities, and contributions to the Company.

      Role of theIndependent Compensation Consultant.  The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain the services of outside advisors. The Compensation Committee has retained compensation consultants in the past to advise on the design and implementation of the various elements of the executive compensation program and the level of individual executive participation.

        The Compensation Committee first retained Aon Hewitt in Fiscal 2009 to serveengaged Mercer as its independent compensation consultant to assist in determining the composition of the Company's Fiscal 2014 peer group for executive compensation purposes and Aon Hewitt has continued in that role since that date. Aon Hewitt providesthe benchmarking of executive and director compensation for Fiscal 2014. Mercer also provided advice and information to the Compensation Committee on other executive compensation matters, including executive pay philosophy and design, prevailing market practices, relevant legal and regulatory requirements, and peer-group data. Aon Hewitt assistedThe Company paid Mercer $227,672 in Fiscal 2014 for its consulting services to the Compensation Committee on executive compensation matters. In Fiscal 2014, Mercer also provided consulting services on the Company's domestic and international health and benefit plans `for which it received fees of $167,500, and other consulting fees for which it received fees of $140,300.

        The Compensation Committee considered whether any conflicts of interest were created by its of Mercer to provide compensation consulting services in Fiscal 2014. Its consideration focused on the following factors: (i) services other than compensation consulting services provided to the Company by Mercer, (ii) total paid by the Company to Mercer for such other services ($307,800), including as a percentage of total revenue of


    Table of Contents

        Committee's decision-makingMercer (.005%), (iii) conflicts of interest policies and procedures of the Company and of Mercer, (iv) the lack of any relationships between Mercer and members of the Company's Board of Directors, (v) Company stock owned by Mercer and its employees and (vi) the lack of any relationships between Mercer and any of the Company's executive officers. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that no conflicts of interest existed with respect to the composition of the Company's peer group for executive compensation comparison purposes, the benchmarking of executive and director compensation for Fiscal 2011, the re-design of the executive compensation program in Fiscal 2011, and the re-design of the director compensation program for Fiscal 2012.Mercer.

      Recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer.  Based upon the compensation parameters established by the Compensation Committee and its compensation consultant, theThe Company's Chief Executive Officer, David P. Storch, provides recommendations regarding compensation actions for all of the other named executive officers.officers based upon the compensation parameters established by the Compensation Committee. In making these recommendations, the Chief Executive Officer evaluates the performance of the executives during the prior year against pre-established performance goals, which cover a range of objective and subjective factors.goals. Some of the performance goals relate to the financial performance of the Company or the executive's business unit.group. Other performance goals are non-quantitative and relate to customer relationships, acquisition integration, diversity development, or similar Company initiatives. The Chief Executive Officer's recommendations reflect his assessment of an individual executive officer's contributions to the performance of the Company.

        The Company's Human Resources Department assists the Chief Executive Officer by collecting and organizing relevant historical and current compensation information, including information received from the Compensation Committee's consultant, as well as peer group compensation information and industry trends. The Chief Executive Officer and theCompany's Vice President of theand Chief Human Resources Department participateOfficer participates in all regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meetings.

          The Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee actively discuss compensation decisions for the Company's executives. However, the Compensation Committee has the ultimate decision-making authority and responsibility for compensation decisions affecting the Company's executives, including its named executive officers. The Chief Executive Officer does not play any role in any decision affecting his own compensation.

        Stock Ownership Guidelines.  Under the Company'sThe Company has stock ownership guidelines requiring directors and executive officers including the named executive officers, and directors, are expected to own and retaina significant amountsequity stake so as to align their interests with the interests of the Company's stock. The Chief Executive Officer is expected to own Companystockholders. These stock (not includingownership guidelines, which were increased in Fiscal 2013, provide as follows:




      Ownership Requirement

      Directors20,000 shares

      Executive Officers

      • Chairman and CEO

      6 times salary

      • President and COO

      3 times salary

      • Other Executive Officer

      1 times salary

          These stock options) having a value at least three times his base salary; the President and other executive officers are expected to own stock having a value of at least 75% of their base salary within five years of becoming an officer; and directors are expected to own at least 10,000 shares of Company stockownership levels must be achieved within four years of becoming a director.director or executive officer and then maintained while in that position. Failure to meet these stock ownership levels may result in a reduction in future stock awards. All current directors


      Table of Contents

          and executive officers comply with the stock ownership guidelines.

          Stock values are measured as of each fiscal year-end, with unvested stock awards counted at 50% and stock options not counted at all.

        Employment Agreements.  The Company does not have an employment agreementsagreement with any executive officer other than Mr. Storch, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. See "Compensation Arrangement with the Chief Executive Officer" on page 53 for a description of the terms of that employment agreement. The Company has severance and change in control agreements with Messrs. Romenesko, Poulton, andFortson, Regan and other executives.Sharp. See "Potential Payments Uponupon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control of the Company" for a description of the terms of these agreements. In all cases, the rationale for these agreements is to provide an appropriate measure of security and incentive to the executive officers in line with market practice. Effective June 1, 2012, the Company determined that it will no longer provide tax gross-up provisions in any new agreement with an executive of the Company.

        Equity Grant Practices.  The Compensation Committee meets from time to time to consider and act with respect to equity compensation awards for the Company's executive officers. The Compensation Committee typically makes its equity compensation decisions at its July

        Table of Contents

          meeting, but it meeting. The Compensation Committee — or the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to authority delegated by the Compensation Committee — also may grant equity compensation awards to newly hired or newly promoted employees at other times during the year. In all cases, the grant equity date is the date on which the Compensation Committee acts to approve the award, unless the Compensation Committee establishes the grant date at a specified future date. Board and Compensation Committee meetings are generally scheduled a year in advance and without regard to anticipated earnings andor other major announcements by the Company. The Company does not time the granting of its equity compensation awards to affect the value of its executive compensation.



        Risk Management of Compensation Practices, including Clawback Policy.Incentive Compensation Recoupment, Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies.  The Compensation Committee considered, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, whether the Company's compensation policies and practices in Fiscal 20112014 for its employees, including the named executive officers, were reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee determined that there was no such material adverse effect instead findingand that the Company's compensation policies and practices do not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking.

          The Compensation Committee determined that the design and operation of the Company's executive compensation program were consistent with the Company's risk management strategies for several reasons. First,based on the following reasons:

          The executive compensation program is designed to provide a proper balance between cash and equity compensation, fixed and variable compensation, and short-term and long-term compensation. Second,

      Table of Contents

          The Fiscal 20112014 annual cash incentive awards — a form of variable cash compensation — were based on two different performance metrics: (i) net income — tied to the Company's income statement performance;earnings per share and (ii) a leverage ratio cash flow from operations.

          tied to the Company's balance sheet performance. Third, the
          The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to reduce any annual cash incentive awardbonus for any reason. Fourth,reason and, in fact, exercised this discretion to reduce by 30% the annual cash bonus awarded to each named executive officer other than Mr. Martinez.

          The balance built into the short-term incentive plan is also reflected in long-term incentive compensation awards, which in Fiscal 20112014 consisted of stock options, time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock. Each of these long-term equity-based incentive awards contains multi-year vesting periods thus promotingdesigned to promote employee growth, development and retention. They also are linked to the value of the Company's Common Stock,common stock, thus aligning management's interest with those of the Company's stockholders. Fifth,

          The performance goals under the long-term incentive plan — cumulative net income in Fiscal 2014 and cumulative net income and return on invested capital in Fiscal 2015 — are different from the performance goals used under the short-term incentive plan.

          The Company has stock ownership guidelines, an incentive compensation recoupment policy, and a clawbackan anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy as further protections for the Company.

          Finally, the Compensation Committee and senior management work together to ensure that the aggregate level of executive compensation fits within the Company's budget.

        Deductibility of Executive Compensation.  Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) generally prevents any public company from claiming a deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million for certain executive officers.officers (namely, the chief executive officer and the three most highly compensated officers other than the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer). This deduction limitation, however, does not apply to performance-based compensation that satisfies certain requirements under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to structure compensation of executive officers so that compensation will not be subject to the deduction limit to the extent that it can reasonably do so in a manner that provides adequate incentives and allows the Company to attract and retain qualified executives. However, the Compensation Committee has previously, and may in the future, structure compensation arrangements that under certain circumstances may be subject to the deduction limit.

          Under the Company's Section 162(m) Annual Cash Incentive Plan, the annual cash bonuses qualified in Fiscal 20112014 as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Stock options and performance-based restricted stock grants awarded under the Stock Benefit Plan also qualified as performance-based


      Table of Contents

          also qualify as performance-based compensation. Base salaries and time-based restricted stock grants do not qualify as performance-based compensation.

          As required under the United States tax rules, the Company must obtain stockholder approval every five years of the material terms of the performance goals for qualifying performance-based compensation.compensation, except where a plan (such as the AAR CORP. 162(m) Annual Cash Incentive Plan) contains only a single performance goal. The Company received stockholder approval of the net income performance goalsgoal under the AAR CORP. 162(m) Annual Cash Incentive Plan at theits 2010 annual meeting of stockholders and is seekingthus does not need any further stockholder approval unless and until it changes or adds to that performance goal. The Company also received stockholder approval of the performance goals under the Company's 2013 Stock Plan at the 2011its 2013 annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, the Company must seek stockholder approval of the performance goals relating to amend the Company's Stock Benefit Plan to add performance criteria to help assure the deductibilitystock compensation no later than its 2018 annual meeting of performance-based stock awards (see Proposal 4).stockholders.


        Table of Contents


        Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2011
        2014

        The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company furnishes the following report to the stockholders of the Company in accordance with applicable SEC rules.

        The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with the Company's management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

        Respectfully submitted,

        Compensation Committee

          Ronald B. Woodard, Chairman
          Anthony K. Anderson
          Norman R. Bobins
          Michael R. Boyce
          James G. Brocksmith, Jr.
          Ronald R. Fogleman
          Peter Pace


        Table of Contents


        Summary Compensation Table1

        The following table sets forth compensation information for the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensatednamed executive officers ("named executive officers") for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011 ("Fiscal 2011"), May 31, 2010 ("2014, Fiscal 2010")2013 and May 31, 2009 ("Fiscal 2009"):2012:

         
         
         Name and Principal Position
          
         Year
          
         Salary
        ($)2

          
         Bonus
        ($)

          
         Stock
        Awards
        ($)3

          
         Option
        Awards
        ($)4

          
         Non-Equity
        Incentive
        Plan
        Compensation
        ($)5

          
         Change in
        Pension Value
        and
        Non-Qualified
        Deferred
        Compensation
        Earnings
        ($)6

          
         All Other
        Compensation
        ($)6,7

          
         Total
        ($)

          
          DAVID P. STORCH    2011    850,000    0    1,695,759    668,254    1,400,900    72,831    622,830    5,310,574  
          

        Chairman of the Board and

            2010    799,208    0    2,562,750    1,480,000    895,494    41,691    698,189    6,477,332  
          

        Chief Executive Officer

            2009    791,295    0    727,650    0    1,154,231    43,437    640,820    3,357,433  
          TIMOTHY J. ROMENESKO    2011    468,180    0    819,306    322,872    701,469    32,962    242,640    2,587,429  
          

        President and Chief

            2010    454,500    0    1,195,950    740,000    451,882    30,493    212,792    3,085,617  
          

        Operating Officer

            2009    450,000    0    339,570    0    553,199    50,503    192,643    1,585,915  
          RICHARD J. POULTON    2011    367,200    0    488,378    192,458    440,137        89,931    1,578,104  
          

        Vice President, Chief

            2010    360,000    0    597,975    444,000    267,767        100,852    1,770,594  
          

        Financial Officer and Treasurer

            2009    330,000    0    169,785    82,843    319,086        51,221    952,935  
          TERRY D. STINSON    2011    338,130    0    86,350    158,800    470,653        260,146    1,314,079  
          

        Group Vice President —

            2010    327,897    0    341,700    74,000    747,840        150,119    1,641,556  
          

        Structures and Systems

            2009    309,000    0    290,325    0    558,321        74,095    1,231,741  
          ROBERT J. REGAN8    2011    367,200    0    488,378    192,458    440,137        108,729    1,596,902  
          

        Vice President, General Counsel

                                                       
          

        and Secretary

                                                       
         
         
         Name and Principal Position
          
         Year
          
         Salary
        ($)2

          
         Bonus
        ($)

          
         Stock
        Awards
        ($)3

          
         Option
        Awards
        ($)4

          
         Non-Equity
        Incentive
        Plan
        Compensation
        ($)5

          
         Change in
        Pension Value
        and
        Non-Qualified
        Deferred
        Compensation
        Earnings ($)6

          
         All Other
        Compensation
        ($)7

          
         Total ($)
          
          DAVID P. STORCH    2014    906,449   0    1,342,704    1,622,016    851,548    55,793    525,062    5,303,572  
          

        Chairman of the Board and

            2013    877,838   0    619,200    695,520    1,350,685    60,352    639,589    4,243,184  
          

        Chief Executive Officer

            2012    867,000   0    2,664,745    578,460    850,000    50,454    826,195    5,836,854  
          TIMOTHY J. ROMENESKO    2014    499,272   0    671,352    811,008    426,393    39,367    202,405    2,649,797  
          

        President and Chief

            2013    483,513   0    309,600    347,760    676,324    40,816    251,357    2,109,370  
          

        Operating Officer

            2012    477,544   0    1,287,491    279,483    423,277    35,958    313,361    2,817,114  
          JOHN C. FORTSON8    2014    400,000   0    241,586    458,424    273,290    0    37,856    1,411,156  
          

        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

                                                      
          RANDY J. MARTINEZ9    2014    360,447   0    0    281,600    570,029    0    34,533    1,246,609  
          

        Aviation Services,

            2013    349,070   0         120,750    638,178    0    23,178    1,131,176  
          

        Group Vice President — Airlift

                                                      
          ROBERT J. REGAN    2014    391,586   0    402,812    486,605    267,541    0    100,311    1,648,855  
          

        Vice President, General Counsel

            2013    379,226   0    185,760    208,656    424,362    0    114,848    1,312,852  
          

        and Secretary

            2012    374,544   0    767,431    166,592    265,586    0    152,916    1,727,069  
          MICHAEL J. SHARP10    2014    360,353   0    161,124    194,642    207,733    3,037    79,347    1,006,236  
          

        Former Acting Chief Financial

            2013    312,576   0    74,304    83,462    322,185    2,905    48,677    844,109  
          

        Officer and Treasurer and Current

                                                      
          

        Vice President, Controller and Chief

                                                      
          

        Accounting Officer

                                                      
        1
        General.    The Summary Compensation Table provides specific compensation information for the Company's named executive officers in accordance with SEC disclosure rules. Please read the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement for a detailed explanation of the Company's pay-for-performance executive compensation program in Fiscal 2011.2014.

        2
        Salary.    The Company instituted a Company-wideWe increased Fiscal 2014 base salaries 2% merit pool increase forover Fiscal 2011,2013 year-end base salaries, effective June 1, 2010. Mr. Storch's base salary was fixed under his employment agreement dated as of May 31, 2010. Mr. Romenesko received a 3% base salary increase for Fiscal 2011. Mr. Stinson received $341,230 in Fiscal 2010, an amount that included $13,333 of retroactive salary that should have been paid in Fiscal 2009.2013.

        3
        Stock Awards.    The amounts in this column for Fiscal 2014 reflect the grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awards granted on July 15, 2013 under the Fiscal 2014 long-term incentive plan and the time-based restricted stock awards granted on July 15, 2013 under the Fiscal 2014 long-term incentive plan, in each case computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2014 for an explanation of the assumptions made by the Company in the valuation of these awards. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal 2014 Executive Compensation — Stock Awards Under the Fiscal 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan" for the maximum potential value of the performance-based restricted stock awards granted on July 15, 2013.

        Generally, the grant date fair value represents the Company's total expense for the grants made to the named executive officers in each of Fiscal 2011,2014, Fiscal 20102013 and Fiscal 2009. See Note 32012. The above amounts reflect the aggregate accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for an explanation of the assumptions madeactual value that may be recognized by the Company innamed executive officers when the valuation of these awards.awards vest. The "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement contains vesting and other information about the performance-based restricted stock awards and the time-based restricted stock awards. The above amounts reflect the aggregate accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by our named executive officers.

        granted in Fiscal 2014.

        4
        Option Awards.    The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the stock option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial

        Table of Contents

          Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2014 for an explanation of the assumptions made by the Company in the valuation of these awards. Generally, the grant date fair value represents the Company's total expense for the grants made to the named executive officers in each of Fiscal 2011,2014, Fiscal 20102013 and Fiscal 2009. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for an explanation of the assumptions made by the Company in the valuation of these awards. The "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy


          Table of Contents

            statement contains vesting and other information about the stock option awards.2012. The above amounts reflect the aggregate accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by ourthe named executive officers. The "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement contains vesting and other information about the stock option awards granted in Fiscal 2014.

          5
          Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.    This column shows the annual cash incentives earned bybonuses paid to each named executive officer under the Company's short-term incentive plan for its executive officers, including the named executive officers. The "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement contains additional information about these annual cash incentives (including that these annual cash incentives qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and are thus fully deductible by the Company).bonuses.

          6
          Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings.    This column shows the increase in the portion of the SKERP benefit derived from the defined benefit formula and the increased pension value under the Retirement Plan. This column does not include any preferential or above-market earnings on deferred compensation as the Company does not pay such earnings on the deferred compensation of its named executive officers.

          7
          All Other Compensation.    The table below provides a breakdown, by type and amount, of the totals shown in the "All Other Compensation" column for each named executive officer in Fiscal 2011.2014. As required by the SEC rules, the Company values perquisites based on the aggregate incremental cost to the Company. In the case of the personal use of aircraft leased by the Company, the Company determines aggregate incremental cost based on average variable costs, including fuel, maintenance, weather-monitoring, on-board catering, and landing/ramp fees. The total variable costs are divided by the number of miles flown by the aircraft to derive an average variable cost per mile. The average variable cost per mile is then multiplied by the miles flown for personal use to derive the incremental variable cost to the Company. This method of calculating incremental cost excludes fixed costs that are incurred irrespective of personal use, such as pilot'spilots' salaries, other employees' salaries, purchase cost of the aircraft and non-trip related hangar expenses.

         
         
         Name
          
         Company
        401(k)
        Plan
        Contributions
        ($)

          
         Company
        SKERP
        Contributions
        ($)

          
         Club
        Dues
        ($)

          
         Financial
        Planning
        ($)

          
         Personal
        Use of
        Aircraft
        ($)

          
         Auto
        Allowance
        ($)

          
         Company-Paid
        Split-Dollar Life
        Insurance
        Premium
        ($)

          
         Executive
        Physical
        ($)

          
         Spouse
        Travel
        ($)

          
         Other
        ($)

          

         

         David P. Storch    16,823    489,149    39,228    18,030    12,736    12,300    31,669    2,339    161    395  

         

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            17,121    195,318    11,070    12,725            4,564    1,842          

         

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            10,742    49,695    29,026                        468      

         

         

        Terry D. Stinson

            22,050    175,962    47,730                    3,331        11,073  

         

         

        Robert J. Regan

            12,580    83,424        12,725                          
         
         
         Named Executive Officer
          
         Company
        401(k)
        Plan
        Contributions
        ($)

          
         Company
        SKERP
        Contributions
        ($)

          
         Club
        Dues
        ($)

          
         Financial
        Planning
        ($)

          
         Personal
        Use of
        Aircraft
        ($)

          
         Auto
        Allowance ($)

          
         Company-Paid
        Split-Dollar Life
        Insurance
        Premium
        ($)

          
         Executive
        Physical
        ($)

          
         Spouse
        Travel
        ($)

          
         Total
        ($)

          

         

         

        David P. Storch

            17,733    376,736    49,009    20,275   0    12,300    42,535    6,474    0    525,062  

         

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            17,785    152,620    9,450    14,303   0    0    6,760    1,487    0    202,405  

         

         

        John C. Fortson

            1,692    13,477    8,700    13,987   0    0    0    0    0    37,856  

         

         

        Randy J. Martinez

            20,230    0    0    14,303   0    0    0    0    0    34,533  

         

         

        Robert J. Regan

            15,227    70,781    0    14,303   0    0    0    0    0    100,311  

         

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            15,206    53,839    8,100    0   0    0    2,202    0    0    79,347  
        8
        Mr. ReganFortson joined the Company in June 2013 and became Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on July 25, 2013.

        9
        Mr. Martinez was not a named executive officer of the Company in Fiscal 2010 or Fiscal 2009.2012.

        10
        Mr. Sharp was Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company from October 27, 2012 to July 25, 2013. He continues to serve as Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company.

        Table of Contents

        Compensation ArrangementNew Employment Agreement with Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

        In Fiscal 2010, the Compensation Committee, on behalf ofMay 2014, the Company entered into a four-yearnew employment agreement with Mr. Storch in order to provide continuing stability to the executive leadership position and to motivate Mr. Storch to increase the Company's growth and profitability. The employment agreement hasfor a three-year term ending May 31, 2014 (unless extended),2017. The new agreement automatically renews thereafter for one-year periods unless either party gives 90 days advance notice prior to the end of the one-year period. The new agreement retains many of the principal terms of the prior agreement, but Mr. Storch voluntarily forfeited certain protections that were included in prior employment agreements dating back to 1989. Specifically:

          The agreement no longer provides a tax gross-up to cover any "280G" excise tax (and related income) that may be triggered following a change in control;

          The agreement no longer provides any severance benefits if Mr. Storch terminates employment for any reason during the 25th month following a change in control;

          The agreement no longer provides a tax gross-up on the portion of the severance payment that is based on the value of Company contributions made on behalf of Mr. Storch under the Company's retirement plans; and

          The agreement no longer provides that equity awards will automatically vest upon change in control; rather, it imposes a "double trigger," meaning that future equity awards will vest only upon a change in controland a termination of employment.

        The new agreement provides the following benefits to Mr. Storch:

          A base salary of not less than $850,000$906,449 per year or such increased amount as the Compensation Committee may determine;

          An annual cash incentive tiedbonus opportunity of up to 200% (or such higher percentage as the Company'sCompensation Committee determines) of base salary for performance against financial goals established by the Compensation Committee;


        Table of Contents

          A long-term equity incentive compensation opportunity under the Company's Stock Benefit Plan or other programsstock plan as determined by the Compensation Committee;

          Specified fringe benefits,perquisites, including personal use forby Mr. Storch and his accompanying spouse and dependent family members of an aircraft chartered by the Company aircraft (subject to the Company's aircraft use policy), an annual automobile allowance, payment of country club dues, fees and certain charges, including reimbursement of dues, fees, charges and expenses relating to membership in professional clubs/organizations and not-for-profit educationalclubs or organizations, financial planning and tax preparation services and participation in an executive physical;physical program; and

          Specified benefits payable upon a termination of employment or a change in control (see "Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control ofby the Company — Employment Agreement of David P. Storch").

          Table of Contents


          Fiscal 20112014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

          The following table sets forth information for each named executive officer with respect to:

            Estimated possible payouts under non-equity incentive plan award opportunities for Fiscal 2011;2014;

            Estimated possible payouts under equity incentive plan award opportunities for Fiscal 2011;2014;

            Other stock awards made in Fiscal 2011;2014; and

            Stock options granted in Fiscal 2011.2014.

           
            
            
           
            
            
            
            
           Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards2
            
           Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards3
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            






           

           Name
           






           Grant
          Date1

           






           Threshold
          ($)

           






           Target
          ($)

           






           Maximum
          ($)

           






           Threshold
          (#)

           






           Target
          (#)

           






           Maximum
          (#)

           






           All Other
          Stock
          Awards:
          Number of
          Shares of
          Stock or
          Units
          (#)4

           






           All Other
          Option
          Awards:
          Number of
          Securities
          Underlying
          Options
          (#)5

           






           Exercise or
          Base Price
          of Option
          Awards
          ($/sh)

           






           Grant Date
          Fair Value
          of Options
          and Awards
          ($)6

           






           

           

          David P. Storch

                  654,500    935,000    1,402,500                                    

           

               7/12/10                   39,276    56,109    112,218                  969,003  

           

               7/12/10                                  42,082             726,756  

           

               7/12/10                                       84,163    17.27   668,254  

           

           

          Timothy J. Romenesko

                  327,726    468,180    702,270                                    

           

               7/12/10                   18,976    27,109    54,218                  468,172  

           

               7/12/10                                  20,332             351,134  

           

               7/12/10                                       40,664    17.27   322,872  

           

           

          Richard J. Poulton

                  205,632    293,760    440,640                                    

           

               7/12/10                   11,311    16,159    32,318                  279,066  

           

               7/12/10                                  12,120             209,312  

           

               7/12/10                                       24,239    17.27   192,458  

           

           Terry D. Stinson7        270,504    428,130                                        

           

               7/12/10                   3,500    5,000    10,000                  86,350  

           

               7/12/10                                                 

           

               7/12/10                                       20,000    17.27   158,800  

           

           

          Robert J. Regan

                  205,632    293,760    440,640                                    

           

               7/12/10                   11,311    16,159    32,318                  279,066  

           

               7/12/10                                  12,120             209,312  

           

               7/12/10                                       24,239    17.27   192,458  
           
            
            
           
            
            
            
            
           Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards2
            
           Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards3
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            






           

           Named Executive Officer
           






           Grant
          Date1

           






           Threshold
          ($)

           






           Target
          ($)

           






           Maximum
          ($)

           






           Threshold
          (#)

           






           Target
          (#)

           






           Maximum
          (#)

           






           All Other
          Stock
          Awards:
          Number of
          Shares of
          Stock or
          Units
          (#)4

           






           All Other
          Option
          Awards:
          Number of
          Securities
          Underlying
          Options
          (#)5

           






           Exercise or
          Base Price
          of Option
          Awards
          ($/sh)

           






           Grant Date
          Fair Value
          of Stock and
          Option
          Awards
          ($)6

           






           

           

          David P. Storch

                  566,531    1,133,061    2,266,122                                    

           

               7/15/13                   13,200    26,400    52,800                  671,352  

           

               7/15/13                                  26,400             671,352  

           

               7/15/13                                       158,400    25.43   1,622,016  

           

           

          Timothy J. Romenesko

                  283,677    567,354    1,134,708                                    

           

               7/15/13                   6,600    13,200    26,400                  335,676  

           

               7/15/13                                  13,200             335,676  

           

               7/15/13                                       79,200    25.43   811,008  

           

           

          John C. Fortson

                  181,818    363,637    727,274                                    

           

               7/15/13                   2,375    4,750    9,500                  120,793  

           

               7/15/13                                  4,750             120,793  

           

               7/15/13                                       44,768    25.43   458,424  

           

           Randy J. Martinez7            360,447    720,894                                    

           

               7/15/13                                       27,500    25.43   281,600  

           

           

          Robert J. Regan

                  177,994    355,988    711,976                                    

           

               7/15/13                   3,960    7,920    15,840                  201,406  

           

               7/15/13                                  7,920             201,406  

           

               7/15/13                                       47,520    25.43   486,605  

           

           

          Michael J. Sharp

                  138,204    276,407    552,814                                    

           

               7/15/13                   1,584    3,168    6,336                  80,562  

           

               7/15/13                                  3,168             80,562  

           

               7/15/13                                       19,008    25.43   194,642  
          1
          The Compensation Committee approved the grant of performance-based restricted stock awards, time-based restricted stock awards and stock options under the Company's Fiscal 20112014 long-term incentive plan at its meeting on July 12, 2010.15, 2013.

          2
          Annual cash incentive payoutsbonuses under the Company's Fiscal 20112014 short-term incentive plan were contingent based upon performance for Fiscal 2011,2014, which has now occurred. Thus, the information in these columns reflects the range of potential payouts at the time the performance goals were set by the Compensation Committee on July 12, 2010.15, 2013. The amounts actually paid under the plan for Fiscal 20112014 are set forth in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column of the Summary Compensation Table. See the "Compensation

          Table of Contents

            "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement for a description of the Fiscal 20112014 short-term incentive plan.


          Table of Contents

        3
        The information in these columns shows the range of performance-based restricted stock grants that could have beenbe earned by the named executive officers under the Fiscal 20112014 long-term incentive plan. The actual number of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted under the Fiscal 20112014 long-term incentive plan is listed in the "Target" column above. As a result of the stock price acceleration provision under the Company's Fiscal 2011 long-term incentive plan, these shares were earned on December 9, 2010, the date on which the Company's Common Stock traded at an average price greater than $24.48 per share for 20 consecutive trading days (more than 30% above the price of $18.39 on June 1, 2010, the beginning of the performance period).

        As a result of a second stock price acceleration provision under the Company's Fiscal 2011 long-term incentive plan, an additional grant equal in amount to the "Target" grant date was made on July 15, 2011, the date on which the Company's Common Stock traded at an average price greater than $27.95 per share for 20 consecutive trading days (more than 50% above the price of $18.39 on June 1, 2010, the beginning of the performance period). The numbers in the "Maximum" column represent the total of the initial grant and the additional grant of performance-based restricted stock shares. See the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement for a description of the performance-based restricted stock program under the Fiscal 20112014 long-term incentive plan.



        4
        This column shows the number of shares of time-based restricted stock granted by the Compensation Committee on July 12, 201015, 2013 to the named executive officers under the Company's Fiscal 20112014 long-term incentive plan.

        5
        This column shows the number of shares of Common Stockcommon stock that may be issued to the named executive officers upon the exercise of stock options granted by the Compensation Committee on July 12, 201015, 2013 under the Company's Fiscal 20112014 long-term incentive plan.

        6
        The grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awards, time-based restricted stock awards and stock options was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

        7
        Mr. Stinson'sMartinez participates in an annual Fiscal 2011 cash incentive opportunities werebonus plan based uponprincipally on the pre-tax income, cash flow and return on invested capital performance of the Structure and Systemshis business group. The threshold amount shown for Mr. Stinson represents the compensation payable to him for achievement of 80% of the pre-tax income performance goal target.unit. See the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis"Analysis — Fiscal 2014 Executive Compensation — Annual Cash Incentives under Fiscal 2014 Short-Term Incentive Plan" section of this proxy statement for additional information about the annual cash incentive opportunities in Fiscal 2011 for Mr. Stinson.information.

        Table of Contents


        Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20112014 Year-End

        The following table sets forth information for each named executive officer with respect to:

          Each stock option that remained outstanding as of May 31, 2011;2014; and

          Each award of restricted stock that was not vested and remained outstanding as of May 31, 2011.2014.

         
         
          
          
         Option Awards1
          
         Restricted Stock Awards
          





         

         Name
         









         Number of
        Securities
        Underlying
        Unexercised
        Options
        Exercisable
        (#)

         









         Number of
        Securities
        Underlying
        Unexercised
        Options
        Unexercisable
        (#)

         









         Equity Incentive
        Plan Awards:
        Number of
        Securities
        Underlying
        Unexercised
        Unearned
        Options
        (#)

         









         Option
        Exercise
        Price
        ($)

         









         Option
        Expiration
        Date

         









         Number of
        Shares or Units
        of Stock That
        Have Not
        Vested
        (#)2

         









         Market
        Value of
        Shares or
        Units of
        Stock That
        Have Not
        Vested
        ($)3

         









         Equity Incentive
        Plan Awards:
        Number of
        Unearned
        Shares, Units,
        or Other Rights
        That Have Not
        Vested
        (#)

         









         Equity Incentive
        Plan Awards:
        Market or Payout
        Value of
        Unearned
        Shares, Units or
        Other Rights
        That Have Not
        Vested
        ($)

         









         

         

        David P. Storch

            116,668    0    0    22.41    7/10/11    352,191    9,294,320    0    0  

          

              29,730    0         16.18    7/9/12                      

          

              95,138    0         16.18    7/9/12                      

          

              27,607    0         17.97    7/21/13                      

          

              66,666    133,334         15.10    7/13/19                      

          

              0    84,163         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            9,341    0    0    25.52    7/10/11    153,441    4,049,308    0    0  

          

              2,109    0         17.50    7/21/13                      

          

              33,333    66,667         15.10    7/13/19                      

          

              0    40,664         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            6,000    4,000    0    19.28    6/1/18    83,279    2,197,733    0    0  

          

              10,000    40,000         15.10    7/13/19                      

          

              0    24,239         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

         

        Terry D. Stinson

            3,333    6,667    0    15.10    7/13/19    32,522    858,256    0    0  

          

              0    20,000         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            6,666    13,334    0    15.10    7/13/19    48,969    1,292,292    0    0  

          

              0    24,239         17.27    7/11/20                      
         
         
          
          
         Option Awards1
          
         Restricted Stock Awards
          





         

         Named Executive Officer
         









         Number of
        Securities
        Underlying
        Unexercised
        Options
        Exercisable
        (#)

         









         Number of
        Securities
        Underlying
        Unexercised
        Options
        Unexercisable
        (#)

         









         Equity Incentive
        Plan Awards:
        Number of
        Securities
        Underlying
        Unexercised
        Unearned
        Options
        (#)

         









         Option
        Exercise
        Price
        ($)

         









         Option
        Expiration
        Date

         









         Number of
        Shares or Units
        of Stock That
        Have Not
        Vested
        (#)2

         









         Market
        Value of
        Shares or
        Units of
        Stock That
        Have Not
        Vested
        ($)3

         









         Equity Incentive
        Plan Awards:
        Number of
        Unearned
        Shares, Units,
        or Other Rights
        That Have Not
        Vested
        (#)4

         









         Equity Incentive
        Plan Awards:
        Market or Payout
        Value of
        Unearned
        Shares, Units or
        Other Rights
        That Have Not
        Vested
        ($)3

         









         

         

        David P. Storch

            200,000    0         15.10    7/13/19    174,657    4,244,165    66,929    1,626,375  

          

              84,163    0         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

              29,412    19,610         29.65    7/11/21                      

          

              28,800    115,200         12.90    7/16/22                      

          

              0    158,400         25.43    7/15/23                      

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            100,000    0         15.10    7/13/19    84,246    2,047,178    33,186    806,420  

          

              40,664    0         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

              14,211    9,474         29.65    7/11/21                      

          

              14,400    57,600         12.90    7/16/22                      

          

              0    79,200         25.43    7/15/23                      

          

         

        John C. Fortson

            0    44,768         25.43    7/15/23    4,750    115,425    4,750    115,425  

          

         

        Randy J. Martinez

            5,000    0         15.10    7/13/19    15,668    380,732          

          

              20,000    0         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

              10,000    0         27.80    1/18/21                      

          

              5,000    20,000         12.90    7/16/22                      

          

              0    27,500         25.43    7/15/23                      

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            20,000    0         15.10    7/13/19    41,626    1,011,512    19,880    483,084  

          

              24,239    0         17.27    7/11/20                      

          

              8,469    5,649         29.65    7/11/21                      

          

              8,640    34,560         12.90    7/16/22                      

          

              0    47,520         25.43    7/15/23                      

          

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            9,165    0         17.27    7/11/20    16,047    389,942    7,848    190,706  

          

              3,201    2,137         29.65    7/11/21                      

          

              3,456    13,824         12.90    7/16/22                      

          

              0    19,008         25.43    7/15/23                      
        1
        Stock options vest in three equal installments, except for stock options granted on June 1, 2008with expiration dates of 7/13/2019, 7/11/2020 and July 11, 2011, which1/18/2021 vest in equal annual installments over three years and stock options with expiration dates of 7/11/2021, 7/16/2022 and 7/15/2023 vest in equal annual installments over five years. Vesting continues upon the participant's termination of employment due to Retirement, Disability (each as defined in the Stock Benefit Plan) or death, as follows:

          Retirement: Stock options to continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule and canmay be exercised until the expiration date. However, if death occurs before the award expires, the unvested stock options are forfeited. If death occurs within three months after Retirement, vested options can be exercised as described below in the "death""Death" provision. If death occurs after three months from Retirement, vested options can be exercised until the option expiration date.

        Table of Contents

            Disability: Stock options continue to vest and are exercisable until the earlier of: (i) one year after termination of employment;employment and (ii) the option expiration date, except that if death occurs before the award expires, then unvested options are forfeited and vested options are exercisable for the period described herein.

            Death: If death occurs during employment, or within three months after termination of employment for reasons other than Cause, then unvested options are forfeited and vested options are exercisable until the earlier of (i) one year after death or (ii) the option expiration date.

          Table of Contents

            Certain options listed were "reload" options, which have an exercise price equal to the NYSE closing price on the date the original option was exercised, but retain the original option expiration date. The Company no longer grants reload options and all outstanding options have been amended to eliminate the reload provisions.

        2
        TheseThe following schedule shows the vesting dates for the unvested shares of time-based restricted stock awards were granted in connection with attainment of previously established performance goals under the Stock Benefit Plan. The vesting schedules applicable to the restricted stock are as follows:named executive officers:



        Restricted Stock Award Grant Date

        Vesting Date

        Vesting Percentage

        5/11/076/1/0920%
        6/1/1140%
        6/1/1340%
        5/31/08*6/1/0920%
        6/1/1140%
        6/1/1340%
        5/31/09*6/1/1120%
        6/1/1340%
        6/1/1540%
        4/23/106/1/1120%
        6/1/1340%
        6/1/1540%
        7/12/105/31/13100%
         
         
         Vesting Date
          
         Mr. Storch
          
         Mr. Romenesko
          
         Mr. Fortson
          
         Mr. Martinez
          
         Mr. Regan
          
         Mr. Sharp
          

         

         

        5/31/15

            52,001    25,124        6,668    14,976    5,664  

         

         

        6/1/15

            60,000    28,000        4,000    8,000    3,000  

         

         

        5/31/16

            24,256    11,922        5,000    7,130    2,775  

         

         

        5/31/17

            25,200    12,600    2,375        7,560    3,024  

         

         

        5/31/18

            13,200    6,600    2,375        3,960    1,584  
          *
          The 8,968 shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. Stinson for Fiscal 2008 on May 31, 2008 and the 13,150 shares of restricted stock granted to him for Fiscal 2009 on May 31, 2009 vest in equal installments over three years.

          Vesting in restricted stock awards continues or is accelerated upon the participant's termination of employment due to Retirement, Disability (each as defined in the Stock Benefit Plan) or death as follows:

          Retirement: The awards continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule.

          Disability or death: On or before the third anniversary of grant, the difference between one-half of the total award shares and the number of award shares already vested will vest as of such termination; after the third anniversary of grant, all award shares vest as of such termination.


        3
        This column showsThese columns show the market value of the unvested shares of time-based restricted and performance-based restricted stock, respectively, held by the named executive officers, based on a price of $26.39$24.30 per share (the closing market price of the Common Stockcommon stock on May 31, 2011,30, 2014, the last business day of Fiscal 2011)2014).

        4
        The following schedule shows the vesting dates for the unvested shares of performance-based restricted stock of the named executive officers (the shares with vesting dates of 5/31/17 and 5/31/18 also remain subject to performance conditions):

         
         
         Vesting Date
          
         Mr. Storch
          
         Mr. Romenesko
          
         Mr. Fortson
          
         Mr. Martinez
          
         Mr. Regan
          
         Mr. Sharp
          

          

         

        5/31/15

            16,263    7,992            4,779    1,859  

          

         

        5/31/16

            25,064    12,392    1,583        7,419    2,915  

          

         

        5/31/17

            16,802    8,402    1,583        5,042    2,018  

          

         

        5/31/18

            8,800    4,400    1,584        2,640    1,056  

        Table of Contents


        Fiscal 20112014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

        The following table sets forth information for each named executive officer concerning:

          The exercise of options during Fiscal 2011;2014;

          The dollar amount realized on exercise of the options;

          The number of shares of restricted stock that vested during Fiscal 2011;2014; and

          The value of those vested shares.

         
         
          
          
         Option Awards
          
         Stock Awards
          
         
          
          
         Number of Shares
        Acquired on Exercise
        (#)

          
         Value Realized on
        Exercise1
        ($)

          
         Number of Shares
        Acquired on Vesting
        (#)

          
         Value Realized on
        Vesting2
        ($)

          

          

         

        David P. Storch

            0    0    52,001    885,057  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            0    0    12,000    204,240  

          

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            10,000    128,284    0    0  

          

         

        Terry D. Stinson

            0    0    7,298    134,210  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            0    0    344    9,388  
         
         
          
          
         Option Awards
          
         Stock Awards
          
         
         Named Executive Officer
          
         Number of Shares
        Acquired on Exercise
        (#)

          
         Value Realized on
        Exercise1
        ($)

          
         Number of Shares
        Acquired on Vesting
        (#)

          
         Value Realized on
        Vesting2
        ($)

          

          

         David P. Storch    27,607    183,863    160,007    3,413,290  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            2,109    15,037    69,195    1,486,399  

          

         

        John C. Fortson

                          

          

         

        Randy J. Martinez

                    5,666    113,660  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

                    21,826    496,452  

          

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            10,000    124,300    10,227    227,316  
        1
        This amount represents the difference between the closing market price of the Common Stockcommon stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares covered by the option.

        2
        These amounts represent the closing market price of the Common Stockcommon stock on the date of vesting, multiplied by the number of shares that vested.

        Table of Contents


        Retirement Program Benefits

        The Company provides defined benefit pension benefits under the SKERP and the Retirement Plan. The following table shows the years of service currently credited to each named executive officer under the applicable plan and the present value of the accumulated benefit payable under the applicable plan to each named executive officer at the earliest age an unreduced benefit is payable.


        Fiscal 20112014 Pension Benefits

         
         
         Name
          
         Plan Name
          
         Number of
        Years
        Credited
        Service
        (#)1

          
         Present
        Value of
        Accumulated
        Benefit
        ($)2

          
         Payments
        During
        Fiscal 2011
        ($)

          

         

         David P. Storch   Retirement Plan   26.4   659,402     

          

             SKERP   N/A   136,222     

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

           Retirement Plan   24.4   582,798     

          

             SKERP   N/A   121,021     

          

         

        Richard J. Poulton3

           Retirement Plan   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

             SKERP   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

         

        Terry D. Stinson3

           Retirement Plan   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

             SKERP   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan3

           Retirement Plan   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

             SKERP   N/A   N/A   N/A  
         
         
         Named Executive Officer
          
         Plan Name
          
         Number of
        Years
        Credited
        Service
        (#)1

          
         Present
        Value of
        Accumulated
        Benefit
        ($)2

          
         Payments
        During
        Fiscal 2014
        ($)

          

         

         David P. Storch   Retirement Plan   26.4   753,600     

          

             SKERP   N/A   245,992     

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

           Retirement Plan   24.4   666,053     

          

             SKERP   N/A   192,611     

          

         

        John C. Fortson3

           Retirement Plan   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

             SKERP   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

         

        Randy J. Martinez3

           Retirement Plan   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

             SKERP   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan3

           Retirement Plan   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

             SKERP   N/A   N/A   N/A  

          

         

        Michael J. Sharp3

           Retirement Plan   8.9   70,002     

          

             SKERP   N/A   N/A   N/A  
        1
        Number of Years of Credited Service as of May 31, 2005, the date the Retirement Plan was frozen.

        2
        Amounts shown in this column are calculated as of May 31, 2011,30, 2014, which is the measurement date for reporting purposes in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2011.2014. See Note 67 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for an explanation of the assumptions made by the Company in determining the amounts reported in this column.

        3
        Messrs. Poulton, StinsonFortson, Martinez and Regan do not participate in the defined benefit portion of the SKERP or in the Retirement Plan.Plan, and Mr. Sharp does not participate in the defined benefit portion of the SKERP.

        SKERP — Defined Benefit Portion

        The Company provides supplemental retirement benefits to certain executives and key employees under the SKERP. The SKERP, which is a non-qualified plan, contains a defined benefit portion and a defined contribution portion (discussed below). Only Mr. Storch and


        Table of Contents

        Mr. Romenesko participate in the defined benefit portion of the SKERP, the material terms and conditions of which include the following:

        Benefit Accruals:    Under the defined benefit portion of the SKERP, benefits were accrued until October 1, 2001 pursuant to a formula that provides a monthly single life annuity at retirement at age 65 equal to: (i) 1/12 of 60% (50% for Mr. Romenesko) of Final Average Earnings less (ii) the monthly benefit payable under the Company's Retirement Plan determined as of October 1,


        Table of Contents


        2001. For purposes of this benefit formula, (i) "Final Average Earnings" is defined as1/5 of a participant's Compensation during the five consecutive years within the last 10 years preceding termination of employment during which such Compensation was the highest, and (ii) "Compensation" is defined as the participant's income reported on Form W-2, including pre-tax contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan, reduced by the income attributable to restricted stock and stock options, reimbursements or other expense allowances and fringe benefits. Benefits accrued on and after October 1, 2001 under the defined benefit portion of the SKERP will accrue pursuant to a formula that provides a monthly single life annuity at retirement at age 65 equal to1/12 of 60% (50% for Mr. Romenesko) of 25% of the percentage increase in the participant's base salary from September 30, 2001 to the date of the participant's termination of employment. The benefits accrued by Messrs. Storch and Romenesko as of May 31, 2006 have been transferred to the defined contribution portion of the SKERP and are held in an account established and maintained thereunder for each participant.

        Benefits accrued under the defined benefit portion of the SKERP for all other participants ceased on October 1, 2001 and were distributed to them in a lump sum as soon as practicable thereafter.

        Benefit Entitlement:    A participant is eligible to receive the benefit accrued under the SKERP following termination of employment when he reaches age 65. If a participant terminates employment after he reaches age 55 and his age plus years of service equal or exceed 62, benefits will be paid on the date of his termination or on a date no later than 15 years after termination of employment, as previously specified by the participant.

        Form of Benefit Payment:    Each participant has previously elected to have the remainder of his retirement benefit paid in a lump sum. The assumptions set forth in the Company's Retirement Plan will be used to convert the retirement benefits from an annuity payment to a lump sum. The participant may change the time or form of payment in accordance with procedures set forth in the SKERP.

        Forfeiture Events:    A participant will forfeit the retirement benefit if his employment is terminated due to theft, embezzlement, fraud or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties that materially injures the Company, or if during employment or the one-year period thereafter the participant violates the covenant not to compete contained in the SKERP. As a condition to receiving his retirement benefit, a participant must agree in writing to return his benefit, plus 8% interest, in the event of such forfeiture. The forfeiture provision does not apply if the participant's termination of employment causes benefits to be paid to him under Change in Control provisions of any agreement between the participant and the Company.


        Table of Contents

        Retirement Plan

        The Company's Retirement Plan is a tax-qualified pension plan. Benefit accruals ceased under the Retirement Plan with respect to most participants, including the named executive officers, effective June 1, 2005. Messrs. Poulton, StinsonFortson, Martinez and Regan do not participate in the Retirement Plan because their dates of hire were after June 1, 2005. The material terms and conditions of the Retirement Plan as they pertain to Messrs. Storch, Romenesko and RomeneskoSharp are as follows:

        Benefit Formula:    Until January 1, 2000, benefits were accrued pursuant to a formula that provides a monthly single life annuity at retirement at age 65 equal to 11/2% of the participant's Final Average Earnings reduced by the participant's Social Security offset determined under the


        Table of Contents


        Plan, multiplied by the participant's years of Credited Service (up to 20). Effective as of January 1, 2000, the Plan was converted to a cash balance type of plan, subject to a "grandfather" provision applicable to certain participants based on age and years of service. An account is maintained for each participant which consists of (i) an opening account balance equal to the then present value of the benefit accrued by the participant under the prior formula as of December 31, 1999, (ii) quarterly contributions made by the Company equal to a percentage of compensation based on the participant's age and years of Credited Service, and (iii) quarterly interest credits made by the Company equal to 25% of the 30-year Treasury securities interest rate for the second month preceding the beginning of each quarter. For purposes of the benefit formulae, "Final Average Earnings" and "Compensation" have the same definitions as used in the SKERP, as discussed above.

        The benefits under the Retirement Plan generally ceased accruing on June 1, 2005, although the participants' cash balance accounts continue to be credited with interest until the benefits are distributed.

        Vesting:    Participants are eligible to receive benefits from the Retirement Plan after completing five years of Vesting Service. The named executive officers who participate in the Retirement Plan are fully vested in their benefits.

        Payment of Retirement Benefits:    Participants can elect to receive their benefits upon termination of employment or they can defer receipt of benefits until normal retirement age (age 65). Any vested participant can elect benefits at any time after termination of employment, with the benefit actuarially reduced to reflect payment prior to age 65. The Retirement Plan also provides for a Disability retirement benefit.

        Forms of Benefit Payment:    The normal form of benefit payment for a married participant is a joint and 50% survivor annuity, and the normal form of benefit payment for an unmarried participant is a single life annuity. Participants, with spousal consent, if applicable, can waive the normal form of benefit payment and elect to have benefits paid in various annuity forms, which are the actuarial equivalent of the normal form, or in a lump sum.

        Retirement Savings Plan:    In connection with ceasing benefits under the Retirement Plan, the Company amended its Retirement Savings Plan to provide additional benefits, as described below in the discussion following the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table.

        Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

        The Company provides non-qualified deferred compensation benefits under the defined contribution portion of the SKERP. The following table below shows the contributions made by


        Table of Contents

        each named executive officer and by the Company in Fiscal 2011,2014, the earnings accrued on the named executive officer's account balance in Fiscal 2011,2014, and the account balance as of May 31, 2011.


        Table of Contents2014. Mr. Martinez does not participate in the SKERP.


        Fiscal 20112014 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

         
         
         Name
          
         Executive
        Contributions
        in Fiscal 2011
        ($)1

          
         Company
        Contributions
        in Fiscal 2011
        ($)2

          
         Aggregate
        Earnings
        in Fiscal 2011
        ($)3

          
         Aggregate
        Withdrawal/
        Distributions
        ($)

          
         Aggregate
        Balance at
        May 31, 2011
        ($)4

          

          

         David P. Storch    79,325    489,149    1,179,643        7,284,614  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            70,484    195,318    232,314        1,632,152  

          

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            15,091    49,695    56,119        282,518  

          

         

        Terry D. Stinson

            45,042    175,962    48,153        546,398  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            48,127    83,424    68,256        366,830  
         
         
         Named Executive Officer
          
         Executive
        Contributions
        in Fiscal 2014
        ($)1

          
         Company
        Contributions
        in Fiscal 2014
        ($)2

          
         Aggregate
        Earnings
        in Fiscal 2014
        ($)3

          
         Aggregate
        Withdrawal/
        Distributions
        ($)

          
         Aggregate
        Balance at
        May 31, 2014
        ($)4

          

          

         David P. Storch    112,840    376,736    2,057,158        12,936,046  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            58,770    152,620    402,816        3,159,904  

          

         

        John C. Fortson

            20,462    13,477    2,317        36,256  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            43,048    70,781    152,996        1,027,588  

          

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            15,805    53,839    74,799        512,437  
        1
        The amount of contributions made by each named executive officer and reported in this column in respect of salary deferrals in Fiscal 20112014 is included in each named executive officer's compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table as "Salary." The amount of contributions reported in this column also reflects deferral of cash bonuses paid in Fiscal 20112014 but earned and reported in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2010.2013.

        2
        The amount of Company contributions reported in this column for each named executive officer is reported in the "All Other Compensation" column in the Summary Compensation Table. For Mr. Storch, Mr. Romenesko and Mr. Regan, these amounts represented a 50% reduction in the amount of the Additional Supplemental Company Contributions earned by formula under the SKERP.

        3
        The investment earnings reported in this column for each named executive officer are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

        4
        The aggregate balance as of May 31, 20112014 reported in this column for each named executive officer reflects amounts that have been previously reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 20112014 or prior years, except the following amounts of earnings included in the account balance: Mr. Storch, $1,823,382;$5,636,850; Mr. Romenesko, $281,855;$1,037,328; Mr. Poulton, $70,217;Fortson, $2,317; Mr. Stinson, $66,881;Regan, $353,082; and Mr. Regan, $89,802.Sharp, $182,745. The aggregate balance as of May 31, 20112014 also includes the following cumulative amounts transferred from the defined benefit portion of the SKERP: Mr. Storch, $1,712,865; and Mr. Romenesko, $272,876.

        SKERP — Defined Contribution Portion

        The defined contribution portion of the SKERP covers certain executives and key employees including all of the named executive officers, and provides the portion of a participant's benefit that cannot be paid under the Retirement Savings Plan due to Internal Revenue Code limits, including the limit on the amount of compensation that can be taken into account in determining benefits ($245,000255,000 in 20102013 and 2011)$260,000 in 2014). The material terms and conditions of the defined contribution portion of the SKERP include the following:

        Contributions:    Each participant may make an election which satisfies Code Section 409A to contribute a portion of his base salary (up to 75%) for that calendar year that exceeds the Code's compensation limit and a portion of the bonus (up to 75%) paid to him for the Company's fiscal year beginning in such calendar year that exceeds the Code's compensation limit. The Company


        Table of Contents

        makes a matching contribution under the SKERP using the formula in the Retirement Savings Plan (i.e., 20% of the first 5% of the participant's contributions, up to 1% of compensation), as well as the portion of the Company's retirement benefit and profit sharing contributions that could not be made under the Savings Plan due to the Code's compensation limit. The Company also makes annual supplemental contributions to the accounts of the Chief Executive Officer (22% of base salary and bonus), the President (16% of base salary and bonus) and other eligible


        Table of Contents


        named executive officers (5% or 10% of base salary and bonus). To receive a credit of this contribution, the eligible participant must be employed as of the day before the contribution is made to the SKERP (unless termination of employment is due to death or Disability). In Fiscal 2014, the annual supplemental contribution for Messrs. Storch, Romenesko and Regan were reduced, at management's recommendation, by 50% (Mr. Fortson and Mr. Sharp received a 5% contribution and Mr. Martinez does not participate in the SKERP).

        Mr. Storch and Mr. Romenesko also have amounts held in a supplemental account that were transferred from the defined benefit portion of the SKERP, which represent the lump sum value of each participant's accrued benefit as of May 31, 2006 under the defined benefit portion. These amounts are now subject to the terms and conditions of the defined contribution portion of the SKERP.

        Vesting:    A participant is fully vested in amounts attributable to his own deferral contributions, and vests in all Company contributions, except supplemental contributions, at a rate equal to 331/3% for each year of vesting service (subject to full vesting upon age 65, death or Disability). A participant vests in amounts attributable to Company supplemental contributions (i) made prior to October 17, 2007, upon the earlier of age 65, or age 57 with 15 years of service, and (ii) made after October 17, 2007, upon the earlier of age 65, or age 55 with the sum of age and years of service equal to at least 75.

        Investments:    Each participant's plan accounts are credited with earnings and losses based on investment alternatives made available by the plan committee and selected by the participant from time to time. The investment options currently offered under the SKERP consist of 24 mutual funds including 10 "Life Cycle" fund choices. Participants may change investment elections at any time.

        Distributions:    Distribution of a participant's accounts is generally made upon the participant's termination of employment or on a date no later than 15 years after termination of employment, as previously specified by the participant. Participants were to elect by December 31, 2005 whether their accounts are to be paid in a lump sum or installments not to exceed 15 years (a participant who failed to make an election will have his account paid in a lump sum). Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) a participant may elect distribution of the portion of his accounts earned and vested as of December 31, 2004 (and earnings thereon) upon six month's advance written election or if such distribution is subject to a 10% forfeiture; (ii) a participant can change the time and form of payment of the portion of his accounts earned and vested after December 31, 2004 in accordance with procedures set forth in the plan; (iii) a participant can elect a distribution at any time in order to satisfy an unforeseeable hardship (as defined in the plan); and (iv) in the event of a potential Change in Control of the Company (as determined by the Board), the portion of the participant's accounts earned and vested as of December 31, 2004 (including earnings thereon) will be distributed in an immediate lump sum. Distributions to "key employees" as defined in Code Section 409A upon termination of employment will not be paid earlier than six months following such termination.


        Table of Contents

        Forfeiture Events:    A participant will forfeit the portion of his plan accounts attributable to Company supplemental contributions and to amounts transferred from the defined benefit portion of the SKERP, if applicable, if his employment is terminated due to theft, embezzlement or fraud or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties that materially injures the Company, or if during employment or the one-year period thereafter the participant violates the covenant not to compete contained in the SKERP. As a condition to receiving such amounts, a participant must agree in writing to return such amounts, plus 8% interest, in the event of such forfeiture. The forfeiture provision does not apply if the participant's termination of employment


        Table of Contents


        causes benefits to be paid to him under change in control provisions of any agreement between the participant and the Company.

        Retirement Savings Plan

        The Retirement Savings Plan is a tax-qualified retirement plan that covers most United States employees, including the named executive officers. The material terms and conditions of the Retirement Savings Plan as it pertains to non-union employees are as follows:

        Contributions:    A participant can elect to defer 1% to 75% of compensation, up to a maximum of $16,500$17,500 for 2011,2014, or $22,500$23,000 if age 50 or older. Contributions can be made on a pre-tax or after-tax basis, as elected by the participant. Unless a participant elects otherwise: (i) participation for non-union employees hired on or after June 1, 2007 and prior to June 26, 2009 is automatic at a 3% deferral rate; and (ii) participation for non-union employees hired on or after June 26, 2009 is automatic at a 5% deferral rate, with automatic 1% annual increase. The Company provides a matching contribution, a profit sharing contribution and a retirement benefit contribution. The current matching contribution is made, as of each payroll period, in an amount equal to 20% of the first 5% of the participant's contributions, up to 1% of compensation, to the Plan for such payroll period. The profit sharing contribution is made, as of the end of each calendar year and is based on the participant's contributions and the economic performance of the participant's operating unit and is equal to a percentage of the participant's compensation, up to 4%. The retirement benefit contribution, which is also made as of the end of each calendar year, was added to the Plan, effective June 1, 2005, and is equal to a percentage of compensation, up to 4%, based on the participant's age and years of credited service. A participant must have earned one year of service to be eligible for a retirement benefit contribution, and generally must be employed on the last day of the calendar year to receive a profit sharing contribution. Compensation for purposes of determining contributions includes cash compensation shown as income on the participant's Form W-2, reduced by the participant's contributions to the plan and excluding the income attributable to restricted stock options, reimbursements or other expense allowances and fringe benefits and subject to the Code's compensation limit ($245,000255,000 for 20102013 and 2011)$260,000 for 2014).

        Investments:    Each participant's plan account is credited with earnings and losses based on investment alternatives made available by the plan committee and selected by the participant from time to time. The investment options currently offered under the plan consist of 24 mutual funds including 10 "Life Cycle" fund choices. Participants may change investment elections at any time.

        Vesting:    Participants hired prior to July 1, 1999 are fully vested in their accounts under the plan. Participants hired on or after January 1, 1999 are fully vested in their own contribution accounts,


        Table of Contents

        and vest in the Company contribution accounts at a rate equal to 331/3% for each year of vesting service (subject to full vesting upon age 65, death or Disability).

        Distributions:    Participants can elect distributions of the plan accounts upon termination of employment, in a lump sum, an eligible rollover distribution, or, if early or normal retirement has been attained, in installments not to exceed 15 years.


        Table of Contents


        Potential Payments Upon a Termination of Employment or a Change in Control of the Company

        The Company provides certain benefits to eligible employees upon certain types of termination of employment, including a termination of employment involving a Change in Control of the Company. These benefits are in addition to the benefits to which the employees would be entitled upon a termination of employment generally (i.e., vested retirement benefits accrued as of the date of termination, stock options and restricted stock that are otherwise vested as of the date of termination and the right to elect continued health coverage pursuant to COBRA). These benefits as they pertain to the named executive officers are as described and set forth in the tables beginning on page            71..

        Employment Agreement of David P. Storch

        The Company has anentered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Storch in Fiscal 2014 that provides the following severance benefits:

        Termination of Employment — Prior to or More than 24 Months After a Change in Control:    If prior to or more than 24 months after a Change in Control, either the Company terminates his employment without Cause or Mr. Storch terminates his employment for Good Reason, Mr. Storch is entitled to: (i) continued payment of his base salary for 36 months, and (ii) a lump sum payment equal to three times the average of the cash incentive bonus paid to him for the preceding three fiscal years of the Company. Payments cease upon any materiala breach of the confidentiality andor non-compete provisions set forth in the agreement (the non-compete provisions remain in effect for the two-year period following any such termination of employment).

        Termination of Employment — Within 24 Months Following a Change in Control:    If Mr. Storch's employment is terminated within 24 months following a Change in Control either by the Company other than for Cause or Disability or by Mr. Storch for Good Reason, or if his employment terminates for any reason other than Disability or death during the 30-day period following the 24th month after a Change in Control, he is entitled to:

          An immediate lump sum payment equal to the sum of (A) any unpaid salary through the date of termination and any unpaid bonus earned for the preceding fiscal year, (B) a pro rata portion of the bonus that would have been paid to him had he remained employed until the end of the fiscal year and all performance targetsgoals were met at target level, and (C) (1) if termination is within the 24-month period for other than Cause, or for Disability or Good Reason, three times his base salary and cash bonus for either the most recently completed fiscal year prior to the termination or the preceding fiscal year, whichever produces the higher amount or (2) if termination is by Mr. Storch during the 30-day period following the 24-month period, an amount equal to $4,747,770 (pursuant to the employment agreement, this amount reflects the computation described in (C)(1) above, based on base salary and bonus paid in Fiscal 2010);amount;

          Continued coverage for Mr. Storch and his spouse under the Company's welfare and fringe benefit plans for three years following termination of employment (he and his spouse can elect continued medical and dental coverage pursuant to COBRA at the end of such three-year period);

          A lump sum payment of an amount equal to the lesser of (A) three times the amount of Company contributions made under the Retirement Savings Plan and the defined

        Table of Contents

            contribution portion of the SKERP for the calendar year preceding the year in which the


          Table of Contents

              termination occurs or (B) $1,575,876 (pursuant to the agreement, this amount reflects the computation described in (A) above based on Company contributions made for the 2009 calendar year), plus, in each case, a gross-up payment to cover any related income tax liability;$1,526,405;

            Company-paid outplacement services for 18 months or, if earlier, the attainment of new employment (up to a maximum Company expense of 3.5% of the amount paid to Mr. Storch pursuant to (C) in the first bullet point above);

            Reasonable legal fees incurred by Mr. Storch in enforcing the agreement; and

            A gross-up payment to coverOutstanding awards under the 2013 Stock Plan will vest and performance goals will be deemed satisfied at the higher of target level or actual level (outstanding but unvested awards under the prior Stock Benefit Plan still vest on the Change in Control).

          If any excise and related tax liability arising under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code as a result of any payment or benefit arising under the agreement.

        would be triggered, Mr. Storch is also entitledcan elect to either (i) receive the full amount of severance benefits and be responsible for paying the excise tax or (ii) receive severance benefits up to the benefits described above under "Termination of Employment — Prior to Change in Control" if he terminates his employment for Good Reason aftermaximum amount that can be paid without triggering the 30th day following the 24th month after a Change in Control. The employment agreement's non-compete provisions do not apply in the case of a termination of employment following a Change in Control.excise tax.

        General:General.    Regardless of whether a Change of Control is involved:

          If Mr. Storch's termination is due to Retirement, he has the right to enter into a consulting agreement for a period of not less than one year, which pays consulting fees equal to 50% of then current base salary. In addition, Mr. Storch and his spouse are entitled to continued coverage under the Company's medical, dental, welfare and executive health programs for his (and his spouse's) lifetime (or until he obtains health coverage from a new employer);

          If Mr. Storch's employment terminates due to Disability, he will receive payment pursuant to the Company's Disabilitydisability plans then in effect, and he will continue to receive coverage under the Company's medical, dental, and life insurance plans for three years following such termination (the employment agreement provides that payments under the Company's Disabilitydisability plans will be at a level no less favorable than that in effect on May 31, 2010)2014); and

          If Mr. Storch's employment is terminated following the expiration of the initial three-year term of his agreement, he will be entitled to receive the same benefits as if he were terminated without Cause by the Company prior to a Change in Control.

        In any event, payments under the employment agreement in connection with Mr. Storch's termination of employment that would be considered deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code will be delayed for six months following such termination to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A.

        For purposes of Mr. Storch's employment agreement:

        "Change in Control" means the earliest of (i) a person's acquisition of more than 35% of the voting power of the Company's outstanding stock, (ii) a merger or consolidation of the Company that results in the holders of the voting stock immediately prior thereto holding less than 60% of the voting stock of the resulting or surviving entity, (iii) a sale of substantially all of the Company's assets other than to an entity at least 80% owned by the Company, or (iv) the election, without the consent of the incumbent Board, of a majority of the directors then in office.


        Table of Contents

        "Cause" means Mr. Storch's (i) dishonesty, intentional breach of fiduciary duty, or intentional wrongdoing or malfeasance, (ii) disregard of a material, lawful and proper direction from the Board, or (iii) material breach of the employment agreement that is not cured within 30 days of receipt of notice from the Company.


        Table of Contents

        "Disability" means a physical or mental condition that has prevented Mr. Storch from substantially performing his duties under the employment agreement for a period of 180 days and that is expected to continue to render Mr. Storch unable to substantially perform his duties for the remaining term of the employment agreement on a full-time basis.

        "Good Reason" means (i) the removal of Mr. Storch from the position of Chairman or Chief Executive Officer of the Company or any successor, (ii) a material reduction in the nature or scope of Mr. Storch's duties or responsibilities or in his compensation (including benefits), (ii)(iii) a material breach of the employment agreement by the Company that is not cured within 30 days of receipt of notice from Mr. Storch, or (iii)(iv) a relocation of his primary place of employment by 50 or more miles.

        "Retirement" means Mr. Storch's voluntary termination of employment that does not result in severance payments under the employment agreement.

        Severance and Change in Control Agreements

        The Company has severance and change in control agreements with Messrs. Romenesko, PoultonFortson, Regan and ReganSharp and with certain other key employees. The agreements as they pertain to these named executive officers provide for the following benefits upon the following types of employment termination:

        Termination of Employment — Prior to a Change in Control:    If a Change in Control of the Company has not occurred and the executive's employment is terminated by the Company other than for Cause, he is entitled to (i) continued salary for 12 months or, if earlier, until he obtains comparable employment, (ii) any earned bonus not yet paid for the preceding fiscal year, and (iii) a pro-rata portion of the bonus that would have been paid to the executive had he remained employed until the end of the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. Any bonus will be paid in a lump sum on the later of the time bonuses are paid to other officers and the end of the severance period (with interest at the prime rate plus 1% from the earlier of such dates). If the executive terminates his employment, or if the Company terminates the executive's employment for Cause, the Company may, but is not required to, pay the above-described severance benefits. Severance payments will cease if the executive breaches the confidentiality or non-compete provisions in the agreement, which are in effect for the one-year severance period.

        Termination of Employment — Following a Change in Control:    If the executive's employment is terminated within 18 months following a Change in Control by the Company other than for Cause or Disability or by the executive for Good Reason, or if the executive's employment terminates for any reason other than Disability or death during the 30-day period following the 18th month after a Change in Control, he is entitled to (i) an immediate lump sum payment equal to the sum of (A) any unpaid salary and bonus earned for the preceding fiscal year, (B) a pro rata portion of the bonus that would have been paid to the executive had he remained employed until the end of the fiscal year and as if all performance targets had been met (including the value of any restricted stock granted in lieu of bonus), and (C) two or three times base salary and cash bonus (depending upon the executive involved) for either the most recently completed fiscal year prior to the termination or the preceding fiscal year, whichever produces the higher amount, (ii) continued coverage for the executive and his dependents under the Company's welfare and


        Table of Contents


        fringe benefit plans for two or three years following termination of employment (the executive and his dependents can elect continued medical and dental coverage pursuant to COBRA at the end of such two- or three-year period), (iii) for Mr. Romenesko and Mr. Sharp, an immediate


        Table of Contents

        lump sum payment equal to the actuarial equivalent of the additional benefits that would be earned under the Company's retirement plans with three additional years of service and a gross-up payment to cover any related income tax liability, (iv) Company-paid outplacement services for the earlier of 18 months or the attainment of new employment (up to a maximum Company expense of 3.5% of the amount paid to the executive pursuant to (i)(C) above), (v) reasonable legal fees incurred by the executive in enforcing the agreement, and (vi) for Mr. Romenesko and Mr. Sharp, a gross-up payment to cover any excise and related tax liability arising under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code as a result of any payment or benefit arising under the agreement. The agreements' non-compete provisions do not apply in the case of a termination of employment following a Change in Control.

        Termination of Employment — Disability:    If the executive's employment terminates due to Disability, the executive will receive payment pursuant to the Company's disability plans then in effect and will continue to receive coverage under the Company's medical, dental and life insurance plans for two or three years following such termination.

        Acceleration of Equity Awards:    The severance and change in control agreements also provide that upon any Change in Control, all outstanding stock options and restricted stock will vest immediately.

        For purposes of the severance and change in control agreements:

        "Change in Control" means (i) a person's acquisition of more than 20% of the voting power of the Company's outstanding stock, (ii) a merger or consolidation of the Company that results in the holders of the voting stock immediately prior thereto holding less than 60% of the voting stock of the resulting or surviving entity, (iii) a sale of substantially all of the Company's assets other than to an entity at least 80% owned by the Company, or (iv) the election, without the consent of the incumbent Board, of the lesser of three directors or a majority of the directors then in office.

        "Cause" means the executive's (i) dishonesty, intentional breach of fiduciary duty, or intentional wrongdoing, (ii) disregard of a material and proper direction from the Board, or (iii) material breach of the agreement that is not cured within 10 days of receipt of notice from the Company.

        "Disability" means a physical or mental condition that has prevented the executive from substantially performing his duties under the agreement for a period of 180 days and that is expected to continue to render the executive unable to substantially perform his duties for the remaining term of the agreement on a full-time basis.

        "Good Reason" means (i) a material reduction in the nature or scope of the executive's duties or responsibilities, or in his compensation (including benefits), (ii) if Mr. Storch is not the Chief Executive Officer at the time of termination, the executive's determination that as a result of a material change in employment circumstances he is unable to adequately carry out his duties, or (iii) a relocation of the executive's primary place of employment by more than 100 miles.

        In any event, payments under the agreements in connection with termination of employment that would be considered deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code


        Table of Contents


        will be delayed for six months following such termination to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A.


        Table of Contents

        Split Dollar Insurance Agreements

        The Company has entered into split dollar life insurance agreements with certain key employees, including Mr. Storch, Mr. Romenesko and Mr. Romenesko.Sharp. Under the agreements, the employees own the policies, except for the cash value portion of the policies owned by the Company. The Company funds the annual insurance premiums for the policies during the term of the agreement subject to reimbursement from the cash value or death benefit proceeds of the policies. Upon a Change in Control of the Company (as defined above), the Company will prepay all premiums, plus any amounts necessary for the cash value and death benefits to be at the same level at the Change in Control date. If the executive's employment terminates after a Change in Control and benefits are paid under the severance and change in control agreements, the split dollar agreements will continue for the severance period.

        Stock Benefit PlanPlans

        A named executive officer's termination of employment can result in enhanced benefits under the CompanyAAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan and the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan, depending on the reason for such termination:

        Stock Options:    If termination is due to Retirement (as defined in the Plan)defined), options continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule and can be exercised until the expiration date, except that if death occurs before the award expires, then unvested stock options are forfeited. If death occurs within three months after Retirement, vested options can be exercised until the earlier of one year after death or the option expiration date, and if death occurs after three months from Retirement, vested options can be exercised until the option expiration date. If termination is due to Disability (as defined in the Stock Benefit Plan)defined), options continue to vest and are exercisable until the earlier of one year after termination of employment and the option expiration date, except that if death occurs before the award expires, then unvested options are forfeited and vested options are exercisable for the period described herein. If death occurs during employment, or within three months after termination of employment for reasons other than Cause, then unvested options are forfeited and vested options are exercisable until the earlier of one year after death or the option expiration date.

        Restricted Stock Awards:    If termination is due to Retirement, restricted stock awards continue to vest in accordance with their vesting schedule. If termination is due to Disability (as defined in the Stock Benefit Plan) or death on or before the third anniversary of the date of grant, then the difference between one-half of the total award shares and the number of shares already vested will vest as of such termination. If termination is due to Disability or death after the third anniversary of the date of grant, all awards shares will vest as of such termination.

        The AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan has change in control provisions that apply to participants who do not have a severance and change in control agreement. Upon a Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the Stock Benefit Plan) that does not have prior written approval of the Board, all options and restricted stock awards will fully vest. Upon a changeChange in controlControl that has the approval of the Board, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to either provide for full vesting of options and restricted stock awards or grant replacement awards with respect to the successor company's stock.

        Award agreements under the AAR CORP. 2013 Stock Plan do not provide for vesting upon a Change in Control (as defined) unless there is a termination of employment by the Company without Cause or by the participant for Good Reason within two years following the Change in Control.


        Table of Contents


        Tables of Potential Payments Upon a Termination
        of Employment or a Change in Control

        The tables set forth below quantify the additional benefits described above that would be paid to each named executive officer under the following termination of employment or change in control events, assuming a change in control or a termination of employment occurred on May 31, 201130, 2014 (the last business day of Fiscal 2011)2014).

         
         Change in Control
         
          
         
        Name

          
         Vesting of Restricted Stock ($)1
          
         Vesting of Stock Options ($)2
          

          

         David P. Storch    9,294,320    2,272,907  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            4,049,308    1,123,526  

          

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            2,197,733    672,660  

          

         

        Terry D. Stinson

            858,256    257,670  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            1,292,292    371,601  
         
         
          
         Equity Vesting — On or After a Change in Control
          
         
         Named Executive Officer
          
         Vesting of Restricted Stock ($)1
          
         Vesting of Stock Options ($)2
          

          

         David P. Storch    5,870,540    1,313,280  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            2,853,598    656,640  

          

         

        John C. Fortson

            230,850      

          

         

        Randy J. Martinez

            380,732    228,000  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            1,494,596    393,984  

          

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            580,649    157,594  
        1
        Under the Stock Benefit PlanCompany's stock plans and severance and change in control agreements, all restricted stock (both performance-based and time-based) generally vests upon a Change in Control of the Company.Company and upon a qualifying termination of employment that occurs within two years following a Change in Control. See "— Stock Benefit Plan"Plans" above. The amounts shown reflect the number of shares that would have vested upon a Change in Control and termination of employment, if applicable, on May 31, 2011,30, 2014 (the last business day of Fiscal 2014), based on the number of shares multiplied by $26.39,$24.30, the closing price of the Common Stockcommon stock on May 31, 2011.30, 2014.

        2
        Under the Stock Benefit PlanCompany's stock plans and severance and change in control agreements, all stock options generally vest upon a Change in Control of the Company.Company and upon a qualifying termination of employment that occurs within two years following a Change in Control. See "— Stock Benefit Plan"Plans" above. The amounts shown reflect the number of option shares that would have vested upon a Change in Control and termination of employment, if applicable, multiplied by the difference (but not less than

        Table of Contents

          zero) between the option exercise price and $26.39,$24.30, the closing price of the Common Stockcommon stock on May 31, 2011.30, 2014 (the last business day of Fiscal 2014).

         
         Termination of Employment — Prior to a Change in Control
         
          
         Other than Cause
          
         Disability
          
         Death
          
          
         Name
          
         Salary
        ($)1

          
         Bonus
        ($)2

          
         Restricted
        Stock
        ($)3

          
         Stock
        Options($)4

          
         Health and
        Welfare
        ($)5

          
         Health and
        Welfare
        ($)6

          
         Restricted
        Stock
        ($)7

          
         Stock
        Options($)4

          
         Restricted
        Stock
        ($)7

          

          

         

        David P. Storch

            2,550,000    3,449,641    9,294,320    2,272,907    282,028    28,893    6,019,440    2,272,907    6,019,440  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            468,180    700,976    4,049,308    1,123,526        37,334    2,301,749    1,123,526    2,301,749  

          

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            367,200    439,828    2,197,733    672,660        24,889    1,230,816    672,660    1,230,816  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            367,200    439,828    1,292,292    371,601        24,889    655,251    371,601    655,251  
         
         
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
         Termination of Employment — Prior to a Change in Control
         
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
         
          
          
         Other than Cause
          
         Disability
          
         Death
          
          
         Named Executive Officer
          
         Salary
        ($)1

          
         Bonus
        ($)2

          
         Restricted
        Stock
        ($)3

          
         Stock
        Options
        ($)4

          
         Health and
        Welfare
        ($)5

          
         Health and
        Welfare
        ($)6

          
         Restricted
        Stock
        ($)7

          
         Stock
        Options
        ($)8

          
         Restricted
        Stock
        ($)7

          

          

         

        David P. Storch

            2,719,346    3,052,233    5,870,540    1,313,280    305,074    36,506    3,819,510    328,320    3,819,510  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            499,272    426,393    2,853,598    656,640        41,829    1,842,001    164,160    1,842,001  

          

         

        John C. Fortson

            400,000    273,290    230,850            27,886    115,425        115,425  

          

         

        Randy J. Martinez

                    380,732    228,000            238,966    57,000    238,966  

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            391,586    267,541    1,494,596    393,984        27,886    889,210    98,496    889,210  

          

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            360,353    207,733    580,649    157,594        41,829    343,687    39,398    343,687  
        1
        Reflects continued salary for 36 months for Mr. Storch under his employment agreement and continued salary for 12 months for the otherfour named executive officers under theirwith severance and change in control agreements.

        2
        Reflects (i) in the case of Mr. Storch, three times the average of the non-equity incentive plan compensation or bonus paid to him for the three preceding fiscal years,Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014, and (ii) in the case of the otherfour named executive officers with severance and change in control agreements, the non-equity incentive plan compensation bonus paid for Fiscal 20112014 as shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

        3
        The amounts in this column reflect the value of the continued vesting of the of the restricted stock that would vest pursuant to the Stock Benefit PlanCompany's stock plans if termination is due to Retirement at May 31, 2011,30, 2014 (the last business day of Fiscal 2014), based on the number of shares, multiplied by $26.39,$24.30, the closing price of the Common Stockcommon stock on May 31, 2011.30, 2014. At May 30, 2014, only Mr. Storch and Mr. Romenesko were eligible for termination due to Retirement.


        Table of Contents

        4
        The amounts in this column reflect the value of the continued vesting of options pursuant to the Stock Benefit PanCompany's stock plans if termination is due to Retirement or Disability at May 31, 201130, 2014 (the last business day of Fiscal 2014) based on the difference between the exercise price and $26.39,$24.30, the closing price of the Common Stockcommon stock on May 31, 2011.30, 2014. At May 30, 2014, only Mr. Storch and Mr. Romenesko were eligible for termination due to Retirement.

        5
        Available under Mr. Storch's employment agreement upon his retirement.Retirement.

        6
        Available under Mr. Storch's employment agreement and the severance and change in control agreements for the otherfour named executive officers.officers with severance and change in control agreements.

        7
        The amounts in these columns reflect the value of the restricted stock that would vest upon termination due to Disability or death at May 31, 2011,30, 2014 (the last business day of Fiscal 2014), based on the number of shares, multiplied by $26.39,$24.30, the closing price of the Common Stockcommon stock on May 31, 2011.30, 2014.

        8
        The amounts in this column reflect the value of continued vesting of options pursuant to the Company's stock plans for one year following termination if termination is due to Disability at May 30, 2014, based

        Table of Contents

          on the difference between the exercise price and $24.30, the closing price of the common stock on May 30, 2014.

         
         Termination of Employment — Following a Change in Control
         
          
         Name
          
         Salary1
        ($)

          
         Bonus2
        ($)

          
         
        Health and
        Welfare
        Continuation
        ($)

          
         Additional
        Retirement
        Plan
        Credits3
        ($)

          
         Outplacement
        Services
        ($)

          
         280G
        Gross-Up
        ($)

          

         

         David P. Storch    2,550,000    5,095,242    28,893    2,526,243    236,241    7,482,511  

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            1,404,540    2,803,904    37,334    1,227,614    122,761    4,300,305  

          

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            734,400    1,319,484    24,889        56,492      

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            734,400    1,319,484    24,889        56,492      
         
         Termination of Employment — Following a Change in Control1
         
          
         Named Executive Officer
          
         Salary2 ($)
          
         Bonus3 ($)
          
         Health and Welfare Continuation ($)
          
         Additional Retirement Plan Credits4 ($)
          
         Outplacement Services ($)
          
         280G Gross-Up ($)
          

         

         David P. Storch    2,719,346    4,903,603    36,506    1,183,269         —5 

          

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            1,497,816    2,455,365    41,829    1,322,546    123,438    3,717,705  

          

         

        John C. Fortson

            800,000    819,870    27,886        47,130      

          

         

        Robert J. Regan

            783,172    1,116,265    27,886        57,116      

          

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            1,081,059    1,174,288    41,829    365,645    71,666    1,453,115  
        1
        These benefits are in addition to the vesting of stock awards shown above in the table for "Equity Vesting — On or After a Change in Control."

        2
        Reflects three times salary for Mr. Storch under his employment agreement and two or three times salary (depending on the officer involved) for the otherfour named executive officers under theirwith severance and change in control agreements.

        23
        Reflects (i) in the case of Mr. Storch, the non-equity incentive plan compensation bonus paid to him for Fiscal 20112014 as shown in the Summary Compensation Table, plus three times his non-equity incentive plan compensation bonus for either the most recently completed fiscal year prior to termination or the preceding fiscal year, whichever produces the higher amount, (except that upon termination by Mr. Storch for other than Disability or death during the 30-day period following the 24th month after a Change in Control, Mr. Storch would receive $4,747,770), and (ii) in the case of the other named executive officers, the non-equity incentive compensation plan bonus paid to them for Fiscal 20112014 as shown in the Summary Compensation Table, plus two or three times the non-equity incentive plan compensation bonus (depending on the officer involved) for either the most recently completed fiscal year prior to termination or the preceding fiscal year, whichever produces the higher amount.

        34
        Includes an income tax gross-up payment.

        5
        Mr. Storch has the right under his employment agreement to either (i) receive the full amount of severance benefits following a Change in Control and be responsible for paying the 280G excise tax or (ii) receive the severance benefits up to the maximum amount that can be paid without triggering the 280G excise tax. To receive benefits up to the maximum amount without triggering the excise tax, it is estimated that Mr. Storch would have to forfeit approximately $4.2 million of benefits.

        Table of Contents



        SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

        The following tables show the shares of Common Stockcommon stock beneficially owned, the percent of shares outstanding if greater than 1% and the number of stock units held, all as of July 31, 2011,2014, by (i) each current director and director nominee for election to the Board, (ii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and (iv) each beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.common stock. Except as noted, the nature of beneficial ownership for shares shown in the tables is sole voting and sole investment power, and none of the shares shown in the tables is pledged by any of the persons listed.

        Security Ownership of Management

         
         
         Name
          
         Shares Beneficially
        Owned1

          
         Percent of Shares
        Outstanding if
        Greater than 1%

          

         

         

        Norman R. Bobins

            20,508      

         

         Michael R. Boyce2    47,308      

         

         

        James G. Brocksmith, Jr.

            30,008      

         

         

        Ronald R. Fogleman

            21,001      

         

         

        James E. Goodwin

            32,000      

         

         Patrick J. Kelly3    36,508      

         

         

        Peter Pace

            7,000      

         

         

        Richard J. Poulton

            139,521      

         

         

        Robert J. Regan

            102,415      

         

         

        Terry D. Stinson

            68,570      

         

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            346,829      

         

         David P. Storch4,5    1,489,499    3.75% 

         

         

        Marc J. Walfish

            47,028      

         

         

        Ronald B. Woodard

            30,508      

         

         

        All directors and executive officers as a group

            2,418,703    6.10% 
         
         
         Name
          
         Shares Beneficially
        Owned1

          
         Percent of Shares
        Outstanding if
        Greater than 1%

          
         Stock Units2
          

         

         

        Anthony K. Anderson

            13,333        0  

         

         

        Norman R. Bobins

            35,572        0  

         

         Michael R. Boyce3    69,938        0  

         

         

        Ronald R. Fogleman

            29,072        36,723  

         

         

        John C. Fortson

            38,453          

         

         

        James E. Goodwin

            44,815        9,202  

         

         Patrick J. Kelly4    51,620        0  

         

         

        Randy J. Martinez

            79,232          

         

         

        Peter Pace

            20,048        0  

         

         

        Robert J. Regan

            182,126          

         

         

        Timothy J. Romenesko

            472,896    1.19%     

         

         

        Michael J. Sharp

            58,211          

         

         David P. Storch5    1,737,973    4.36%     

         

         

        Marc J. Walfish

            72,157        28,110  

         

         

        Ronald B. Woodard

            25,072        0  

         

         

        All directors and executive officers as a group

            2,930,518    7.35%   74,035  
        1
        Includes unvested restricted shares held by directors and executive officers, as well as the following shares of the identified person that may be acquired within 60 days of July 31, 20112014 through the exercise of stock options: Mr. Brocksmith, 7,000 shares; General Fogleman, 7,0000 shares; Mr. Fortson, 8,953 shares; Mr. Goodwin, 7,0000 shares; Mr. Poulton, 34,079Martinez, 50,500 shares; Mr. Regan, 21,41179,492 shares; Mr. Romenesko, 82,329199,515 shares; Mr. Stinson, 13,332 shares;Sharp, 23,079; Mr. Storch, 313,861402,855 shares; Mr. Walfish, 17,0000 shares; and Mr. Woodard, 3,5000 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 516,512764,394 shares.

        Table of Contents

        2
        Represents stock units held by directors who defer all or a portion of their director compensation under the Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan. Each stock unit represents the right to receive one share of common stock upon termination of service on the Board or the happening of certain other events, as specified in the Plan.

        23
        Includes 10,000 shares beneficially owned through Maverick Investors Limited Partnership, a family partnership of which Mr. Boyce is a general partner.

        34
        Includes 16,000 shares beneficially owned through KMK & Associates, LLC, of which Mr. Kelly is a one-third owner.

        45
        IncludesIncludes: (a) 18,810 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Storch's wife, as to which Mr. Storch disclaims beneficial ownership.

        5
        Includesownership; (b) 50,000 shares beneficially owned through DPS Asset Management LLC, a family investment vehicle of which Mr. Storch is President.President; (c) 2,025 shares under the Lorraine Storch Revocable Trust under which Mr. Storch is trustee and a beneficiary; (d) 250,000 shares owned through the Storch Family Dynasty Trust, under which Mr. Storch is trustee and a beneficiary; and (e) 100,793 shares beneficially owned through a limited power of attorney arrangement, as to which Mr. Storch disclaims beneficial ownership.

        Table of Contents


        Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

         
         
         Name and Address
        of Beneficial Owner

          
         Number of Shares
          
         Percent of Class
          

         

         

        Barclays Global Investors, NA1
        400 Howard Street
        San Francisco, CA 94105

            2,616,811    6.77% 

         

         

        BlackRock, Inc.2
        40 East 52nd Street
        New York, NY 10022

            3,089,181    7.79% 

         

         

        Dimensional Fund Advisors LP3
        Palisades West, Building One
        6300 Bee Cave Road
        Austin, TX 78746

            2,381,977    6% 

         

         

        Earnest Partners, LLC4
        1180 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 2300
        Atlanta, GA 30309

            2,787,410    7% 

         

         

        Fred Alger Management, Inc.5 and
        Alger Associates Incorporated
        111 Fifth Avenue
        New York, NY 10003

            2,037,459    5.14% 

         

         

        Invesco Ltd.6
        1555 Peachtree Street NE
        Atlanta, GA 30309

            3,637,147    9.2% 
         
         
         Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
          
         Number of Shares
          
         Percent of Class
          

         

         

        BlackRock, Inc.1
        40 East 52nd Street
        New York, NY 10022

            3,914,897    9.9  

         

         

        Dimensional Fund Advisors LP2
        Palisades West, Building One
        6300 Bee Cave Road
        Austin, TX 78746

            3,361,841    8.49  

         

         

        Franklin Resources Inc.3
        One Franklin Parkway
        San Mateo, CA 94403

            3,664,284    9.3  

         

         

        Vanguard Group, Inc.4
        100 Vanguard Blvd.
        Malvern, PA 19355

            2,352,195    5.93  
        1
        Based on a Schedule 13G filing dated 2/6/09, Barclays Global Investors, NA and certain of its affiliates1/17/14, BlackRock, Inc. disclosed beneficial ownership with respect to the shares as follows:

        •  Sole voting power:

          2,024,7803,779,169 

        •  Shared voting power:

          0 

        •  Sole dispositive power:

          2,616,8113,914,897 

        •  Shared dispositive power:

          0 
        2
        Based on a Schedule 13G filing dated 2/3/11, BlackRock, Inc. disclosed beneficial ownership with respect to the shares as follows:

        •  Sole voting power:

        3,089,181

        •  Shared voting power:

        0

        •  Sole dispositive power:

        3,089,181

        •  Shared dispositive power:

        0
        3
        Based on a Schedule 13G filing dated 2/11/11,1/14, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP disclosed beneficial ownership with respect to the shares as follows:

        •  Sole voting power:

          2,334,1993,279,255 

        •  Shared voting power:

          0 

        •  Sole dispositive power:

          2,381,9773,361,841 

        •  Shared dispositive power:

          0 

        Table of Contents

        43
        Based on a Schedule 13G filing dated 2/1/11, Earnest Partners, LLC disclosed beneficial ownership with respect to the shares as follows:

        •  Sole voting power:

        1,222,646

        •  Shared voting power:

        553,964

        •  Sole dispositive power:

        2,787,410

        •  Shared dispositive power:

        0
        5
        Based on a Schedule 13G filing dated 2/14/11, Fred Alger Management,5/14, Franklin Resources, Inc. disclosed beneficial ownership with respect to the shares as follows:

        •  Sole voting power:

          2,037,4593,414,284 

        •  Shared voting power:

          0 

        •  Sole dispositive power:

          2,037,4593,664,284 

        •  Shared dispositive power:

          0 
        64
        Based on a Schedule 13G filing dated 2/7/11, Invesco Ltd.6/14, the Vanguard Group, Inc. disclosed beneficial ownership with respect to the shares as follows:

        •  Sole voting power:

          3,469,26856,899 

        •  Shared voting power:

          0 

        •  Sole dispositive power:

          3,637,1472,279,796 

        •  Shared dispositive power:

          054,399 


        Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

        Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's officers and directors, and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Company's stock, if any, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4, and 5 with the SEC and the NYSE, and to furnish copies of these forms to the Company. To the Company's knowledge, based solely upon a review of copies of SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 and upon related written representations furnished to the Company with respect to Fiscal 2011,2014, the Company believes that all of the Company's officers and directors filed on a timely basis all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during Fiscal 2011, except that Mr. Dany Kleiman, an executive officer of the Company, filed a late Form 4 on November 18, 2010 to report the sale of 1,706 shares used to pay his taxes in connection with the release of restricted shares.


        OTHER BUSINESS

        Management knows of no other matters which are to be brought before the annual meeting. However, if any other matter properly comes before the annual meeting, the named proxy holders will vote all proxies in their discretion and best judgment on such other matter.2014.


        Table of Contents


        EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table provides information as of May 31, 2014 with respect to the Company's compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance (shares in thousands):

          
          
          
         Number of
        securities
        to be issued upon
        exercise of
        outstanding
        options, warrants
        and rights
        (a)

          
         Weighted-average
        exercise
        price of outstanding
        options, warrants
        and rights
        (b)

          
         Number of securities
        remaining available
        for
        future issuance under
        equity compensation
        plans
        (excluding securities
        reflected in column (a))
        (c)

          

          

         Equity compensation plans approved by securities holders    2,753    19.59    2,017  

          

         

        Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders

                      

          

         

        Total

            2,753    19.59    2,017  

        Table of Contents



        STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2012OUR 2015 ANNUAL MEETING

        Any stockholder who, in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8, wishes to present a proposal for consideration at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 20122015 must submit such proposal to the Company, in writing, to be received by the Secretary of the Company, AAR CORP., One AAR Place, 1100 N. Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois 60191, no later than May 5, 2012,4, 2015, in order for the proposal to be eligible for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement and form of proxy for that meeting. The proposal must comply with applicable SEC rules and the Company's By-Laws.

        Under the Company's By-Laws, any stockholder who wishes to submit a matter (other than a stockholder proposal brought in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8) for consideration at the 20122015 annual meeting of stockholders, including any stockholder proposal or director nomination, that would not be included in the Company's proxy statement must submit the matter to the Company, in writing, to be received by the Secretary of the Company no later than April 18, 2012.11, 2015. The notice of such matter must contain the information required by the By-Laws.

        OTHER BUSINESS

        Management knows of no other matters which are to be brought before the annual meeting. However, if any other matter properly comes before the annual meeting, the named proxy holders will vote all proxies in their discretion and best judgment on such other matter.

          By Order of the Board of Directors,

         

         

        Robert J. Regan
        Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

        September 2, 2011August 29, 2014

        Upon the written request of any record holder or beneficial owner of common stock of AAR CORP., the Company will provide, without charge, a copy of its annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011.2014. Requests should be made to Mr. Robert J. Regan, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, AAR CORP., One AAR Place, 1100 North Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, Illinois 60191, (630) 227-2000.


        Table of Contents


        APPENDIX A — AAR CORP. CATEGORICAL STANDARDS AND POLICY FOR
        DETERMINING DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

        It is the policy and practice of AAR CORP. (the "Company") that the directors of the Company, when carrying out their duties, must exercise their independent judgment in good faith and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders as a whole.

        In addition, it is the policy of the Company that a majority of its directors, and all directors serving on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, shall be "independent," as determined by the Board in accordance with the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE").

        At least once each year, the Board shall review the "independence" of each director and any nominee for director and make a determination whether the director or nominee has any material relationship with the Company (either directly or indirectly as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) that would impair the director's ability to exercise independent judgment as a member of the Board.

        To assist it in determining a director's "independence," the Board has adopted the following categorical standards for determining director "independence" status with respect to service as a director*:


        *
        The foregoing categorical standards shall be deemed to be automatically updated to reflect any changes made to the NYSE listing standards and shall be interpreted in the same manner as such standards.

        1.
        For purposes of these categorical standards, the "Company" includes each of the Company's subsidiaries and "immediate family member" means a person's spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- and fathers-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, brothers- and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the person's home; provided, that any such persons who no longer have any such relationship as a result of legal separation or divorce, or death or incapacitation, shall not be considered immediate family members.

        2.
        No director shall be independent if he/she does not meet the independent standards adopted from time to time by the NYSE. Specifically, a director willnot be "independent" if:

          the director is or was within the last three years an employee of the Company, or an immediate family member of such director is or was within the last three years an executive officer of the Company; or

          the director or an immediate family member of the director receives or received more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the Company in any twelve-month period with the last three years, other than director and committee fees, and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent on continued service); provided, however, that compensation received by an immediate family member of a director for service as an employee (other than an executive officer) of the Company need not be considered in determining independence; or

        Table of Contents

            (A) The director or an immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is the Company's internal or external auditor; (B) the director is a current employee of such firm; (C) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such firm and who personally works on the Company's audit; or (D) the director or an immediate family member was, within the last three years (but is no longer), a partner or employee of such firm and personally worked on the Company's audit during that time; or

            the director or an immediate family member of the director is or was within the last three years an executive officer of another company on whose compensation committee any of the Company's present executive officers serves or served; or

            the director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company's consolidated gross revenues (payments to and payments from are compared against the benchmarks separately).

        3.
        In determining director independence, the Board will give consideration to all known relevant facts and circumstances.

        4.
        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a director or his/her immediate family member has another significant relationship with the Company that is not described in Section 2, or, at any time, is the subject of a written request by any director to the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee requesting a review of another director's independent status and stating the reasons therefor, then the Board of Directors will determine whether that director's relationship is a "material relationship" that would impair the director's ability to exercise independent judgment as a member of the Board.

        5.
        Members of the Audit Committee must satisfy the enhanced "independence" criteria under applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange from time to time. In particular, the following enhanced "independence" qualifying criteria shall apply with respect to directors selected for service on the Audit Committee:

          Director may not have accepted any direct or indirect consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company other than amounts received as compensation for membership on the Board or Board committees, pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service.

          Director may not be an "affiliated person," i.e., a person who directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, the Company (typically, one who is an executive officer or who owns more than 10% of the Company's securities is considered an "affiliated person").

          SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
          AAR CORP. STOCK BENEFIT PLAN

          WHEREAS, AAR CORP. (the “Company”) maintains the AAR CORP. Stock Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2001 and further amended from time to time (the “Plan”); and

          WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan and now deems it appropriate to do so.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective as of July 11, 2011 or as otherwise specified:

          1.The second paragraph of Section 1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

          Key Employees and Non-Employee Directors who have been selected by the Committee to receive an Award shall participate in the Plan.  The Committee shall determine, within the limits of the express provisions of the Plan, those Key Employees and Non-Employee Directors to whom, and the time or times at which, Awards shall be granted.  The Committee shall also determine the number of Shares to be subject to each Award, with respect to Key Employees the type of Awards (Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Options or Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)); with respect to Non-Employee Directors the type of Awards (Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Options); the type of Options for Key Employees (ISO or NSO); the duration of each Option; the exercise price under each Option, the time or times within which (during the Term of the Option) all or portions of each Option may be exercised, whether cash, Shares, Options or other property may be accepted in full or partial payment upon exercise of an Option; the restrictions to be imposed on Awards and any other terms and conditions of such Awards.

          2.The definition of “Award” in subsection 2.1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

          “Award” shall mean an Option, a Restricted Stock Award, a Restricted Stock Unit or an SAR.

          3.Subsections 2.21 through 2.27 are renumbered as subsections 2.23 through 2.29, and new subsections 2.21 and 2.22 are added to read as follows:

          2.21“Restricted Stock Unit” means the grant, at the time or times fixed by the Committee in accordance with the Plan, and subject to such other limitations and restrictions as the Plan and the Committee may impose, of the right to Shares or cash.

          2.22“Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement” means a written agreement issued in connection with the grant of a Restricted Stock Unit Award, as specified in Section 12.



          4.Section 3 of the Plan is amended, subject to stockholder approval at the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to add a new subsection 3.6 to read as follows:

          3.6The Committee may, in its discretion, provide that any Award granted under the Plan shall be subject to the attainment of performance goals, including those that qualify the Award as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.

          (a)Performance goals may be based on one or more business criteria, including, but not limited to: earnings, earnings per share or earnings per share growth; earnings before interest and taxes, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization; Share price; total stockholder return, return on assets; net asset turnover; inventory turnover; return on capital or return on invested capital; return on equity; cash flow; net or pre-tax income; profit margin; market share; expense management; revenue; revenue growth; stockholder equity; leverage ratio; investment rating; and debt coverage.  Performance goals may be absolute in their terms or measured against or in relationship to the performance of other companies or indices selected by the Committee, and may be particular to one or more lines of business or Subsidiaries or may be based on the performance of the Company and its Subsidiaries as a whole.  In addition, the Committee may adjust performance goals for any events that occur during a performance period, including significant acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or assets by the Company, litigation, judgments or settlements; the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results; any reorganization and restructuring programs; extraordinary items as described in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Section 225-20-20; significant, non-recurring charges or credits; and foreign exchange rates.

          (b)With respect to each performance period established by the Committee, the Committee shall establish such performance goals relating to one or more of the business criteria identified above, and shall establish targets for Grantees for achievement of performance goals.  The performance goals and performance targets established by the Committee may be identical for all Grantees for a given performance period or, at the discretion of the Committee, may differ among Grantees. Following the completion of each performance period, the Committee shall determine the extent to which performance goals for that performance period have been achieved and the related performance-based restrictions shall lapse in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement.

          5.Subsection 4.1 of the Plan is amended by revising the fourth sentence and adding a new fifth sentence to read as follows:

          Any Shares subject to issuance with respect to an Award but which are not issued because of a lapse, expiration, cancellation or termination of any such Award, or which have been issued in connection with Restricted Stock Awards that are subsequently cancelled or forfeited, to the extent consistent with applicable law,

          2



          rules and regulations, shall once again be available for issuance pursuant to subsequent Awards.  The number of Shares delivered by the Grantee or withheld by the Company on the Grantee’s behalf as full or partial payment of an Option, including the exercise price of an Option or of any required withholding taxes with respect to the Option, shall once again be available for issuance pursuant to subsequent Awards, but the number of Shares delivered by a Grantee as full or partial payment of any withholding taxes with respect to a Restricted Stock Award shall not again be available for issuance pursuant to subsequent Awards and shall count against the aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan.

          6.Section 4 of the Plan is amended by adding a new subsection 4.4 to read as follows:

          4.4Of the Shares authorized for issuance under the Plan, the maximum number of Shares that may be used for Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance based” in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code that may be granted to any Key Employee in any calendar year is 300,000, or, in the event the Award is settled in cash, an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of such number of Shares on the date on which the Award is settled.

          7.Subsection 5.3 of the Plan is amended by deleting “as provided in Section 12” from subsections (c) and (d).

          8.Subsection 5.4 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

          Each Option shall become exercisable at the time, and for the number of Shares, fixed by the Committee in the Option Agreement, provided that the Committee, in its discretion, shall have the power at any time to accelerate the dates for exercise of any or all Options, or any part thereof, granted to a Non-Employee Director or a Key Employee under the Plan.

          9.Subsection 7.1 of the Plan is amended by deleting the second sentence therefrom.

          10.Subsection 9.2 of the Plan is amended by deleting the second sentence therefrom.

          11.Subsection 9.5(b) of the Plan is amended by deleting “, which date shall not be earlier than the first anniversary of such grant” therefrom.

          12.Subsection 9.6 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

          Dividends paid on Restricted Stock Awards shall be subject to the following:  (a) if the Restricted Stock Award is subject to performance-based restrictions as described in subsection 3.6, the Company shall accumulate and hold such amounts, and (b) if the Restricted Stock Award is subject to time-based restrictions, the Committee shall have the discretion to cause the Company to accumulate and hold such amounts.  To the extent dividends are held by the Company, the accumulated amounts shall be paid to the Grantee only upon the lapse of the restrictions to which the Restricted Stock Award is subject and any

          3



          such amounts attributable to the portion of the Restricted Stock Award for which the restrictions do not lapse shall be forfeited.

          13.Section 10 of the Plan is amended by (i) deleting the last sentence of subsection 10.4(b) and (ii) deleting “pursuant to Section 12 below” from subsection 10.5.

          14.Sections 11 through 28 of the Plan (and all references to such Sections) are renumbered to be Sections 12 through 29, and a new Section 11 is added to the Plan to read as follows:

          11.Restricted Stock Units

          11.1Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee may also grant to Key Employees and Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Units from time to time.  Each Restricted Stock Unit shall entitle the Key Employee or Non-Employee Director to receive, on the date or upon the occurrence of an event (including the attainment of performance goals) as described in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, one Share or cash equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of such event, as provided in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

          11.2At the Committee’s option, the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement may provide that the Restricted Stock Unit Award granted to a Key Employee or Non-Employee Director pursuant to the Plan shall be forfeited to the Company if, among other reasons, (a) the Key Employee or Non-Employee Director violates a non-competition, confidentiality or employment agreement, any Company policy, or any other conditions set forth in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement or in a separate document, (b) the Key Employee’s employment with the Company, or the Non-Employee Director’s service on the Committee, terminates prior to the date or dates for expiration of the forfeiture provisions set forth in the applicable Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, (c) the Key Employee’s employment with the Company terminates for Cause, or (d) there occurs a violation of any provisions of the applicable Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.  A forfeiture pursuant to this subsection 11.2 shall occur immediately following the mailing of written notice to the Key Employee or Non-Employee Director.

          11.3The Committee may proscribe such other restrictions and conditions and other terms applicable to the Restricted Stock Units issued to a Key Employee or Non-Employee Director under the Plan that are neither inconsistent with nor prohibited by the Plan or any Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, including, without limitation, terms providing for a lapse of the restrictions of this Section 11, provided they are set forth in the applicable Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, in installments.  Further, the Committee, in its discretion, shall have the power at any time to accelerate the dates the restrictions lapse on any or all of the Restricted Stock Units granted to a Key Employee or Non-Employee Director.

          11.4A Grantee shall have no rights of a stockholder, including voting or dividend or other distribution rights, with respect to any Restricted Stock Units

          4



          prior to the date they are settled in Shares. A Restricted Stock Unit Agreement may provide that, until the Restricted Stock Units are settled in Shares or cash, the Grantee shall receive, on each dividend or distribution payment date applicable to the Shares, an amount equal to the dividends or distributions that the Grantee would have received had the Restricted Stock Units held by the Grantee as of the related record date been actual Shares. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, in the case of a Restricted Stock Unit Award that provides for the right to receive amounts related to dividends or distributions: (a) if such Restricted Stock Unit Award is subject to performance-based restrictions as described in subsection 3.6, the Company shall accumulate and hold such amounts, and (b) if such Restricted Stock Unit Award is subject to time-based restrictions, the Committee shall have the discretion to cause the Company to accumulate and hold such amounts.  To the extent such amounts are held by the Company, the accumulated amounts shall be paid to the Grantee only upon the lapse of the restrictions to which the Restricted Stock Unit Award is subject and any such amounts attributable to the portion of a Restricted Stock Unit Award for which the restrictions do not lapse shall be forfeited.

          11.5Upon settlement of Restricted Stock Units in Shares, the Company shall issue, in the name of the Grantee, stock certificates representing a number of Shares equal to the number of Restricted Stock Units being settled.

          15.Section 13 of the Plan (as renumbered pursuant to Item 14) is amended by renumbering subsection 13.7 as 13.8 and adding a new subsection 13.7 to read as follows:

          13.7Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 13, the Option or SAR of a Grantee shall be subject to the provisions of any written employment or severance agreement that has been or may be executed by the Grantee and the Company, and the provisions in such employment or severance agreement concerning the Option or SAR shall supercede any inconsistent or contrary provision of this Agreement.

          16.Section 14 of the Plan (as renumbered pursuant to Item 14) is amended by (i) revising the first sentence of subsection 14.1(a) to add “or Restricted Stock Units” after the second parenthetical; (ii) revising subsections 14.1(b) and 14.2 to add “and Restricted Stock Units” after each reference to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Award and to add “restricted stock units” after the reference to restricted stock.

          17.Section 15 of the Plan (as renumbered pursuant to Item 14) is amended by adding new subsection 15.3 to read as follows:

          15.3Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of the Plan, the Company, in lieu of issuing stock certificates pursuant to an Award, may reflect the issuance of Shares to a Grantee on a non—certificated basis, with the ownership of such Shares by the Grantee evidenced solely by book entry in the records of the Company’s transfer agent; provided, however, that upon the written request of the Grantee, the Company shall issue, in the name of the Grantee, stock certificates representing such shares.

          5



          18.The first paragraph of Section 20 of the Plan (as renumbered pursuant to Item 14) is amended by adding a second and third sentence to read as follows:

          Notwithstanding the foregoing, there shall be no amendment to the Plan or any outstanding Option Agreement that results in the repricing of Options without stockholder approval.  For this purpose repricing includes a reduction in the exercise price of the Option or the cancellation of an Option in exchange for cash, Options with an exercise price of the cancelled Options, Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units or any other consideration provided by the Company but does not include any adjustment described in subsection 4.2.

          19.Section 21 of the Plan (as renumbered pursuant to Item 14) is amended by revising the third sentence to read as follows:

          In lieu of making a cash payment to the Company, the Grantee may elect to satisfy his or her tax withholding obligation incurred in connection with the Taxable Date of an Award by (a) directing the Company to withhold a portion of the Shares otherwise distributable to the Grantee, (b) by transferring to the Company a certain number of Shares (either subject to such Award or previously owned), such Shares being valued at Fair Market Value for the Shares on such Taxable Date, (c) in cash from a broker-dealer to whom the Grantee has submitted a notice together with instructions to deliver promptly to the Company the amount of sales proceeds from the sale of Shares subject to the Award to pay the withholding taxes, or (d) by any combination thereof.

          20.Section 27 of the Plan (as renumbered pursuant to Item 14) is amended by deleting it in its entirety, and the following two Sections are renumbered as 27 and 28.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Seventh Amendment has been executed as of the 11th day of July, 2011.

          AAR CORP.

          By:

          /s/ Timothy O. Skelly

          Vice President, Human Resources

          6


          GRAPHIC

          0000113632_1 R1.0.0.11699See the reverse side of this notice to obtain proxy materials and voting instructions. *** Exercise Your Right to Vote *** Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on October 12, 2011 AAR CORP. Meeting Information Meeting Type: Annual Meeting For holders as of: August 19, 2011 Date: October 12, 2011 Time: 9:00 AM CDT AAR CORP. 1100 N. WOOD DALE ROAD WOOD DALE, IL 60191 Location: 1100 North Wood Dale Road Wood Dale, IL 6019108, 2014. You are receiving this communication because you hold shares in the above named company. This is not a ballot. You cannot use this notice to vote these shares. This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. You may view the proxy materials online at www.proxyvote.com or easily request a paper copy (see reverse side). We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. See the reverse side of this notice to obtain proxy materials and voting instructions.Meeting Information Meeting Type: <mtgtype> For holders as of: <recdate> Date: Time: <mtgtime> Location: 0000218643_1 R1.0.0.51160 AAR CORP. AAR CORP. ONE AAR PLACE 1100 NORTH WOOD DALE ROAD WOOD DALE, IL 60191 Annual Meeting August 19, 2014 October 08, 2014 October 08, 2014 9:00 AM CDT AAR CORP. One AAR Place 1100 North Wood Dale Road Wood Dale, IL 60191

           


          GRAPHIC

          0000113632_2 R1.0.0.11699 Before You Vote How to Access the Proxy Materials Proxy Materials Available to VIEW or RECEIVE: 1. Annual Report 2. Notice & Proxy Statement How to View Online: Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow following page) and visit: www.proxyvote.com. How to Request and Receive a PAPER or E-MAIL Copy: XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the If you want to receive a paper or e-mail copy of these documents, you must request one. There is NO charge for requesting a copy. Please choose one of the following methods to make your request: 1) BY INTERNET: www.proxyvote.com 2) BY TELEPHONE: 1-800-579-1639 3) BY E-MAIL*: sendmaterial@proxyvote.com * If requesting materials by e-mail, please send a blank e-mail with the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX (located on the following page) in the subject line. Requests, instructions and other inquiries sent to this e-mail address will NOT be forwarded to your investment advisor. Please make the request as instructed above on or before September 28, 2011 to facilitate timely delivery. How To Vote Please Choose One of the Following Voting Methods Vote In Person: Many shareholder meetings have attendance requirements including, but not limited to, the possession of an attendance ticket issued by the entity holding the meeting. Please check the meeting materials for any special requirements for meeting attendance. At the meeting, you will need to request a ballot to vote these shares. Vote By Internet: To vote now by Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow XXXX XXXX XXXX available and follow the instructions. Vote By Mail: You can vote by mail by requesting a paper copy of the materials, which will include a proxy card. How To Vote . XXXX XXXX XXXX Before You Vote How to Access the Proxy Materials Proxy Materials Available to VIEW or RECEIVE: How to View Online: Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow (located on the following page) and visit: www.proxyvote.com. How to Request and Receive a PAPER or E-MAIL Copy: If you want to receive a paper or e-mail copy of these documents, you must request one. There is NO charge for requesting a copy. Please choose one of the following methods to make your request: 1) BY INTERNET: www.proxyvote.com 2) BY TELEPHONE: 1-800-579-1639 3) BY E-MAIL*: sendmaterial@proxyvote.com * If requesting materials by e-mail, please send a blank e-mail with the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow (located on the following page) in the subject line. . XXXX XXXX XXXX . XXXX XXXX XXXX 0000218643_2 R1.0.0.51160 1. Notice & Proxy Statement 2. Annual Report to Stockholders 3. Annual Report on Form 10-K Requests, instructions and other inquiries sent to this e-mail address will NOT be forwarded to your investment advisor. Please make the request as instructed above on or before September 24, 2014 to facilitate timely delivery.

           


          GRAPHIC

          0000113632_3 R1.0.0.11699 Voting items 0000218643_3 R1.0.0.51160 The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Ronald R. Fogleman 02 Patrick J. Kelly 0302 Peter Pace 03 Timothy J. Romenesko 04 Ronald B. Woodard The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:proposals 2 and 3. 2. Advisory vote onto approve executive compensation. The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal: 3 Advisory vote on the frequency of future executive compensation votes. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 4 and 5. 4 Approval of an amendment to the AAR Corp. Stock Benefit Plan to add performance criteria in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 53. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2012.2015. NOTE: As to any other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, this Proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxiesproxies.

           


          GRAPHIC

          0000113632_4 R1.0.0.116990000218643_4 R1.0.0.51160

           

           

          GRAPHIC

          0000113633_1 R1.0.0.11699THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature (Joint Owners) Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Date To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000218644_1 R1.0.0.51160 For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Patrick J. Kelly 02 Peter Pace 03 Timothy J. Romenesko 04 Ronald B. Woodard AAR CORP. ONE AAR PLACE 1100 N.NORTH WOOD DALE ROAD WOOD DALE, IL 60191 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 10:59 P.M. Central Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our companyCompany in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 10:59 P.M. Central Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: For Withhold For All All All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except”proposals 2 and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 1. Election of Directors Nominees 0 0 0 01 Ronald R. Fogleman 02 Patrick J. Kelly 03 Peter Pace 04 Ronald B. Woodard The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:3. For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 22. Advisory vote onto approve executive compensation. The Board of Directors recommends you 0 0 0 53. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2012. 0 0 0 vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal: 1 year 2 years 3 years Abstain 3 Advisory vote on the frequency of future executive compensation votes. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR 0 0 0 02015. NOTE: As to any other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, this Proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxies proposals 4 and 5. For Against Abstain 4 Approval of an amendment to the AAR Corp. Stock Benefit Plan to add performance criteria in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 0 0 0 For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions)proxies. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) DateFor address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions)

           


          GRAPHIC

          0000113633_2 R1.0.0.116990000218644_2 R1.0.0.51160 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement, Annual Report to Stockholders, Annual Report on Form 10-K is/are available at www.proxyvote.com . AAR CORP. This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors Annual Meeting of Stockholders The undersigned hereby appoints DAVID P. STORCH and ROBERT J. REGAN, or either of them, with full power of substitution, as Proxies, and hereby authorizes them to represent the undersigned at the 20112014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AAR CORP. to be held at 9:00 AM Central Time on October 12, 2011,8, 2014, at One AAR Place, 1100 North Wood Dale Road, Wood Dale, IL 60191, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this Proxy, all shares of AAR CORP. Common Stock that the undersigned is entitled to vote. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations on the reverse side. Address change/comments: (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Address change/comments: Continued and to be signed on reverse side